Advertisement

Online Stakeholder Interaction of Some Airlines in the Light of Situational Crisis Communication Theory

  • Boyang ZhangEmail author
  • Denis Kotkov
  • Jari Veijalainen
  • Alexander Semenov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9844)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the participation of main actors in Facebook. The engagement shows different degrees of participation that directly affect the brand image and reputation. This research applies Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) to interaction in the social media. It provides possibilities for decision makers to monitor diverse messages online, understand stakeholder concerns and reply to them adequately, which is especially important in crisis situations. Seven airline organizations were selected for a comparative analysis concerning their online discussions. The verified Facebook and Twitter accounts of those airlines were investigated, the status updates of the airlines and comments issued by other users during 2009-2016 collected along the replies and comments issued by the airlines themselves. The main methods are sentiment analysis, categorization of the messages into four categories and counting.

Keywords

Situational Crisis Communication Theory Stakeholder theory Airlines Sentiment analysis Facebook Twitter 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors were supported in part by the Academy of Finland, grant number 268078 (MineSocMed).

References

  1. 1.
    Botha, E., Mignon, R.: To share or not to share: the role of content and emotion in viral marketing. J. Public Aff. 13(2), 160–171 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chou, W.S., Yvonne, M.H., Hunt, E.B.B., Richard, P.M., Moser, P., Bradford, W.H.: Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. J. Med. Internet Res. 11, 4 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coombs, W.T., Holladay, J.S.: Amazon.com’s Orwellian nightmare: exploring apology in an online environment. J. Commun. Manag. 16(3), 280–295 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coombs, W.T., Hollday, J.S.: How publics react to crisis communication efforts. J. Commun. Manag. 18(1), 40–57 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coombs, W.T.: Crisis Management and Communications. Institute for Public Relations, 30 October 2007. http://www.instituteforpr.org/crisis-management-and-communications/
  6. 6.
    Coombs, W.T.: Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: the development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corp. Reput. 10(3), 1–14 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elefant, C.: The ‘Power’ of social media: legal issues and best practices for utilities engaging social media. Energy Law J. 32(1), 1 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freberg, K.: Intention to comply with crisis messages communicated via social media. Public Relat. Rev. 38(3), 416–421 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Edward, C.M., Haenlein, M., Skiera, B., Wege, E., Zhang, M.: Managing customer relationships in the social media era: introducing the social CRM house. J. Interact. Market. 27(4), 270–280 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seungahn, N., Saxton, G.D.: Modeling the adoption and use of social media by nonprofit organizations. New Media Soc. 15(2), 294–313 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schwarz, A.: How publics use social media to respond to blame games in crisis communication: the love parade tragedy in Duisburg 2010. Public Relat. Rev. 38(3), 430–437 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sinha, V., Subramanian, K.S., Bhattacharya, S., Chaudhary, K.: The contemporary framework on social media analytics as an emerging tool for behavior informatics, HR analytics and business process. Manag. J. Contemp. Manag. Issues 17(2), 65–84 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shari, R.V., Petrun, L.E., Roberts, H.A.: Issue management gone awry: when not to respond to an online reputation threat. Corp. Reput. Rev. 15(4), 319–332 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boyang Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Denis Kotkov
    • 1
  • Jari Veijalainen
    • 1
  • Alexander Semenov
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Information SystemsUniversity of JyvaskylaJyvaskylaFinland

Personalised recommendations