Advertisement

Take up My Tags: Exploring Benefits of Meaning Making in a Collaborative Learning Task at the Workplace

  • Sebastian Dennerlein
  • Paul Seitlinger
  • Elisabeth Lex
  • Tobias Ley
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9891)

Abstract

In the digital realm, meaning making is reflected in the reciprocal manipulation of mediating artefacts. We understand uptake, i.e. interaction with and understanding of others’ artefact interpretations, as central mechanism and investigate its impact on individual and social learning at work. Results of our social tagging field study indicate that increased uptake of others’ tags is related to a higher shared understanding of collaborators as well as narrower and more elaborative exploration in individual information search. We attribute the social and individual impact to accommodative processes in the high uptake condition.

Keywords

Collaborative learning Meaning making Uptake Social tagging 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The work is funded by Know-Center GmbH (COMET Program managed by AT Research Promotion Agency FFG), Austrian Science Fund (FWF; Grant Project: 25593-G22) and EU-IP Learning Layers (Grant Agreement: 318209).

References

  1. 1.
    Cress, U., Held, C., Kimmerle, J.: The collective knowledge of social tags: Direct and indirect influences on navigation, learning, and information processing. Comput. Educ. 60(1), 59–73 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dennerlein, S., Theiler, D., Marton, P., Rodriguez, P.S., Cook, J., Lindstaedt, S., Lex, E.: KnowBrain: an online social knowledge repository for informal workplace learning. In: Conole, G., et al. (eds.) EC-TEL 2015. LNCS, vol. 9307, pp. 509–512. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_48 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ley, T., Seitlinger, P.: Dynamics of human categorization in a collaborative tagging system: how social processes of semantic stabilization shape individual sensemaking. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 140–151 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jonassen, D.H., Beissner, K., Yacci, M.: Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Knowledge Creation Diffusion Utilization. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., Skvoretz, J.: Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc. Netw. 32(3), 245–251 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paavola, S., Hakkarainen, K.: From MM to joint construction of knowledge practices and artefacts: A trialogical approach to CSCL. In: Proceedings of CSCL, pp. 83–92 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stahl, G.: Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., Suthers, D.D.: Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. Computer 4, 409–426 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suthers, D.D.: Technology affordances for intersubjective MM: A research agenda for CSCL. ijCSCL 1(3), 315–337 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Dennerlein
    • 1
  • Paul Seitlinger
    • 1
  • Elisabeth Lex
    • 1
  • Tobias Ley
    • 2
  1. 1.Graz University of TechnologyGrazAustria
  2. 2.Tallinn UniversityTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations