Advertisement

A Trust Framework for Agents’ Interactions in Collaborative Logistics

  • Morice Daudi
  • Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge
  • Klaus-Dieter Thoben
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Logistics book series (LNLO)

Abstract

Trust is an essential factor for successful resource sharing in logistics. To build and sustain trust among collaborating partners in logistics requires, amongst others, conceptualizing on various aspects constituting underlying mistrusts. The conception is achieved by setting up a framework describing trust-based collaborative interactions of these partnering entities, referred to as agents. This research establishes a trust framework addressing agents’ trustworthy interactions and thus aims at overcoming a knowledge gap identified in the literature. The framework depicts trust-based interactions concentrating to sharing of vehicle capacities. The trust framework is conceived on a foundation of theoretical body of knowledge in the literature. It engages knowledge on collaborative networks, logistics and transportation, agent behavior as well as trust. This research contributes by identifying key agents together with their roles, characteristics, tasks, information exchange as well as perceptions; all of which linked to agent trust. The framework is reusable in many ways, including formal conception of models aspiring to empirically investigate trust amongst agents sharing logistics resources. It also provides more understanding to practitioners, especially on issues relating to compromising differences resulting from agent’s perspectives.

Keywords

Trust Trust framework Logistics collaboration Agent trustworthiness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The corresponding author would like to acknowledge the support of the Ministry of Education and Vocation Training (MoEVT – Tanzania), and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) under the Tanzania-Germany Postgraduate Training Programme.

References

  1. Asawasakulsorn A (2009) Transportation collaboration: partner selection criteria and IOS design issues for supporting trust. Int J Bus Inf 4(2):199–220Google Scholar
  2. Bennett P (2004) Confrontation analysis: prediction, interpretation or diagnosis? In: Analyzing conflict and its resolution. Proceedings of a conference of the Institute of Mathematics and its Application, IMA, Southend-on-SeaGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryant J (2004) Drama theory as the behavioral rationale in agent-based models. In: Analyzing conflict and its resolution, conference of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications. OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Dellarocas C (2003) Building trust online: The design of robust reputation reporting mechanisms in online trading communities. In: Information society or information economy? A combined perspective on the digital era. Idea Book Publishing, pp 95–113Google Scholar
  5. Delbufalo E (2012) Outcomes of inter-organizational trust in supply chain relationships: a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Supply Chain Manage 17(4):377–402Google Scholar
  6. Gonzalez-Feliu J, Morana J (2011) Collaborative transportation sharing: from theory to practice via a case study from France. In: Yearwood JL, Stranieri A (eds) Technologies for supporting reasoning communities and collaborative decision making: cooperative approaches, information science reference, Hershey, PA, pp 252–271Google Scholar
  7. Graham L (2011) Transport collaboration in Europe. White Paper, ProLogis ResearchGoogle Scholar
  8. Hu J, Bian W, Han S, Ju S (2011) An empirical research of the influence factors of the action from MF network collaboration to logistics organization performance. AISS 3(6):259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jøsang A, Ismail R, Boyd C (2007) A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decis Support Syst 43(2):618–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kwan M, Ramachandran D (2009) Trust and online reputation systems. In: Golbeck J (ed) Computing with social trust. Springer, pp 287–311Google Scholar
  11. Laeequddin M, Sahay BS, Sahay V, Waheed KA (2012) Trust building in supply chain partners’ relationship: an integrated conceptual model. J Manage Dev 31(6)550–564Google Scholar
  12. Li PP (2012) When trust matters the most: The imperatives for contextualizing trust research. J Trust Res 2(2):101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mayer RC, Davis J, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad Manage Rev 20(3):709–734Google Scholar
  14. Nielsen BB (2011) Trust in strategic alliances: toward a co-evolutionary research model. J Trust Res 1(2):159–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nguyen NP, Liem NT (2013) Inter-firm trust production: theoretical perspectives. Int J Bus Manage 8(7):46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Okdinawati L, Simatupang TM, Sunitiyoso Y (2014) A behavioral multi-agent model for collaborative transportation management (CTM). In: Proceedings of T-LOGGoogle Scholar
  17. Peeta S, Hernandez S (2011) Modeling of collaborative less-than-truckload carrier freight networks, USDOT Region V Regional University TransportationGoogle Scholar
  18. Seifert M (2007) Collaboration formation in virtual organizations by applying prospective performance measurement. Dissertation, University of BremenGoogle Scholar
  19. Thoben KD, Jagdev HS (2001) Typological issues in enterprise networks. Manage Oper 12(5):421–436Google Scholar
  20. VICS Logistics Committee (2004) Collaborative transportation management. Accessed 8 Apr 2015Google Scholar
  21. Xu X (2013) Collaboration mechanism in the horizontal logistics collaboration. Dissertation, Paris Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morice Daudi
    • 1
  • Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge
    • 2
    • 3
  • Klaus-Dieter Thoben
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.International Graduate School for Dynamics in Logistics (IGS)University of BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik at the University of BremenBremenGermany
  3. 3.School of Technology and Health, KTHRoyal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations