Advertisement

The Role of Online Processing in Young Children’s Learning from Interactive and Noninteractive Digital Media

  • Heather Kirkorian
  • Tiffany Pempek
  • Koeun Choi
Chapter

Abstract

In the current chapter, we consider the role of information processing in young children’s learning from screens. We describe methods for assessing online processing while children watch video, including physiological measures such as eye movements and heart rate, and argue for the importance of considering both selective and sustained attention in order to fully understand how children process digital media content. We also explore techniques that have proven successful in facilitating transfer from screens to real-life objects. In particular, we discuss the benefits of clarifying the symbolic nature of screen media, reducing cognitive load, and creating interactive experiences with screens. We conclude with a synthesis of these disparate literatures and suggestions for future research.

Keywords

Video deficit Transfer deficit Eye tracking Educational media Video comprehension Information processing Selective attention Sustained attention Learning Online processing Infants Young children 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation to the University of Wisconsin-Madison (Heather L. Kirkorian, Principal Investigator, BCS-1226550, BCS-1525726) and Hollins University (Tiffany A. Pempek, Principal Investigator, BCS-1524539). Findings and opinions expressed in this chapter do not reflect endorsement by the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. Alwitt, L. F., Anderson, D. R., Lorch, E. P., & Levin, S. R. (1980). Preschool children’s visual attention to attributes of television. Human Communication Research, 7, 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. R., & Kirkorian, H. L. (2015). Media and cognitive development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, D. R., & Levin, S. R. (1976). Young children’s attention to Sesame Street. Child Development, 47, 806–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, D. R., & Lorch, E. P. (1983). Looking at television: Action or reaction? In J. Bryant & D. R. Anderson (Eds.), Children’s understanding of television: Research on attention and comprehension (pp. 1–34). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, D. R., Alwitt, L. F., Lorch, E. P., & Levin, S. R. (1979). Watching children watch television. In G. A. Hale & M. Lewis (Eds.), Attention and cognitive development (pp. 331–361). New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, D. R., Lorch, E. P., Field, D. E., & Sanders, J. (1981). The effects of television program comprehensibility on preschool children’s visual attention to television. Child Development, 52, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson, D. R., Choi, H. P., & Lorch, E. P. (1987). Attentional inertia reduces distractibility during young children’s TV viewing. Child Development, 58, 798–806.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Aslin, R. N. (2007). What’s in a look? Developmental Science, 10, 48–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00563.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Barr, R. (2013). Memory constraints on infant learning from picture books, television, and touchscreens. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barr, R., & Wyss, N. (2008). Reenactment of televised content by 2-year-olds: Toddlers use language learned from television to solve a difficult imitation problem. Infant Behavior and Development, 31, 696–703.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Barr, R., Muentener, P., Garcia, A., Fujimoto, M., & Chavez, V. (2007). The effect of repetition on imitation from television during infancy. Developmental Psychobiology, 49, 196–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Burns, J. J., & Anderson, D. R. (1993). Attentional inertia and recognition memory in adult television viewing. Communication Research, 20, 777–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Calvert, S. L., Huston, A. C., Watkins, B. A., & Wright, J. C. (1982). The relation between selective attention to television forms and children’s comprehension of content. Child Development, 53, 601–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carver, L. J., Meltzoff, A. N., & Dawson, G. (2006). Event-related potential (ERP) indices of infants’ recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects in two and three dimensions. Developmental Science, 9, 51–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00463.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Choi, H. P., & Anderson, D. R. (1991). A temporal analysis of toy play and distractibility in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 52, 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Choi, K., & Kirkorian, H. L. (2016). Touch or watch to learn? Toddlers’ object retrieval using contingent and noncontingent video. Psychological Science. doi: 10.1177/0956797616636110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Choi, K., Kirkorian, H. L., Pempek, T. A., & Schroeder, E. (2015, March). Toddlers’ object retrieval using touchscreens: The role of working memory skills. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development in Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  18. Colombo, J., Mitchell, D. W., Coldren, J. T., & Freeseman, L. J. (1991). Individual differences in infant visual fixation: Are short lookers faster processors or feature processors? Child Development, 62, 1247–1257.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Colombo, J., Richman, W. A., Shaddy, D. J., Greenhoot, A. F., & Maikranz, J. M. (2001). Heart rate-defined phases of attention, look duration, and infant performance in the paired-comparison paradigm. Child Development, 72, 1605–1616.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Colombo, J., Shaddy, D. J., Richman, W. A., Maikranz, J. M., & Blaga, O. (2004). Developmental course of visual habituation preschool cognitive language outcome. Infancy, 5, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Courage, M. L., Reynolds, G. D., & Richards, J. E. (2006). Infants’ attention to patterned stimuli: Developmental change from 3 to 12 months of age. Child Development, 77, 680–695.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. DeLoache, J. S. (1987). Rapid change in the symbolic functioning of very young children. Science, 238, 1556–1557.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. DeLoache, J. S. (1991). Symbolic functioning in very young children: Understanding of pictures and models. Child Development, 62, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DeLoache, J. S. (2000). Dual representation and young children’s use of scale model. Child Development, 71, 329–338.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. DeLoache, J. S., Miller, K. F., & Rosengren, K. S. (1997). The credible shrinking room: Very young children’s performance with symbolic and nonsymbolic relations. Psychological Science, 8, 308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dickerson, K., Gerhardstein, P., Zack, E., & Barr, R. (2013). Age-related changes in learning across early childhood: A new imitation task. Developmental Psychobiology, 55, 719–732.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dorr, M., Martinetz, T., Gegenfurtner, K., & Barth, E. (2010). Variability of eye movements when viewing dynamic natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 10, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frank, M. C., Vul, E., & Johnson, S. P. (2009). Development of infants’ attention to faces during the first year. Cognition, 110, 160–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gola, A. A. H., & Calvert, S. L. (2011). Infants’ visual attention to baby DVDs as a function of program pacing. Infancy, 16, 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gola, A. A. H., Kirkorian, H. L., Anderson, D. R., & Calvert, S. (2011, May). Attention-eliciting versus attention-maintaining formal features of infant DVDs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  31. Gola, A. A. H., Richards, M. N., Lauricella, A. R., & Calvert, S. L. (2013). Building meaningful parasocial relationships between toddlers and media characters to teach early mathematical skills. Media Psychology, 16(4), 390–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldstein, R. B., Woods, R. L., & Peli, E. (2007). Where people look when watching movies: Do all viewers look at the same place? Computers in Biology and Medicine, 37, 957–964.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gredeback, G., Johnson, S., & von Hofsten, C. (2010). Eye tracking in infancy research. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35, 1–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hayhoe, M. M., Shrivastava, A., Mruczek, R., & Pelz, J. B. (2003). Visual memory and motor planning in a natural task. Journal of Vision, 3, 49–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 498–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huston, A. C., & Wright, J. C. (1983). Children’s processing of television: The informative functions of formal features. In J. Bryant & D. R. Anderson (Eds.), Children’s understanding of television: Research on attention and comprehension (pp. 35–68). New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
  37. Kirkorian, H. L., & Anderson, D. R. (in press). Anticipatory eye movements while watching movement across shots in video sequences: A developmental study. Child Development. Google Scholar
  38. Kirkorian, H. L., Anderson, D. R., & Keen, R. (2012). Age differences in online processing of video: An eye movement study. Child Development, 83, 497–507. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01719.x.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Kirkorian, H. L., Hanson, K. G., Lavigne, H. J., Demers, L. B., Lauricella, A., Gola, A. A. H., … Calvert, S. L. (2012, June). Toddlers’ processing of familiar and novel video characters: An eye movement study. Poster presented at the biannual International Conference on Infant Studies, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  40. Kirkorian, H. L., Lavigne, H. J., Hanson, K. G., Troseth, G., & Anderson, D. R. (2014, July). Dissociations between toddlers’ visual attention to and subsequent memory for information presented in-person and on video. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the International Society on Infant Studies in Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  41. Kirkorian, H. L., Choi, K., Schroeder, E., & Etta, R. (2015, March). Object retrieval using interactive video: The role of visual selection in learning from screens. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development in Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  42. Kirkorian, H. L., Choi, K., & Pempek, T. A. (2016). Toddlers’ word learning from contingent and noncontingent video on touchscreens. Child Development, 87, 405–413. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12508.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kirkorian, H. L., Lavigne, H. J., Hanson, K. G., Troseth, G., Demers, L. B., & Anderson, D. R. (2016). Video deficit in toddlers’ object retrieval: What eye movements reveal about online cognition. Infancy, 21, 37–64. doi: 10.1111/infa.12102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kuhl, P. K. (2007). Is speech learning ‘gated’ by the social brain? Developmental Science, 10(1), 110–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Land, M. F., Mennie, N., & Rusted, J. (1999). Eye movements and the roles of vision in activities of daily living: Making a cup of tea. Perception, 28, 1311–1328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Lauricella, A. R., Pempek, T. A., Barr, R., & Calvert, S. L. (2010). Contingent computer interactions for young children’s object retrieval success. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(5), 362–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lauricella, A. R., Gola, A. A. H., & Calvert, S. L. (2011). Toddlers’ learning from socially meaningful video characters. Media Psychology, 14, 216–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Le Meur, O., Le Callet, P., & Barba, D. (2007). Predicting visual fixations on video based on low-level visual features. Vision Research, 47, 2483–2498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Lorch, E. P., & Castle, V. J. (1997). Preschool children’s attention to television: Visual attention and probe response times. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 111–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. McClure, E., & Barr, R. (2016). Building family relationships from a distance: Supporting connections with babies and toddlers using video and video chat. In R. Barr & D. N. Linebarger (Eds.), Media exposure during infancy and early childhood: The effects of content and context on learning and development. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45102-2_15.Google Scholar
  51. Mital, P. K., Smith, T. J., Hill, R., & Henderson, J. M. (2010). Clustering of gaze during dynamic scene viewing is predicted by motion. Cognitive Computation, 3, 2–24.Google Scholar
  52. Nielsen, M., Simcock, G., & Jenkins, L. (2008). The effect of social engagement on 24-month-olds’ imitation from live and televised models. Developmental Science, 11, 722–731.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Pempek, T. A., Kirkorian, H. L., Richards, J. E., Anderson, D. R., Lund, A. F., & Stevens, M. (2010). Video comprehensibility and attention in very young children. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1283–1293.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Reynolds, G. D., & Richards, J. E. (2007). Infant heart rate: A developmental psychophysiological perspective. In L. A. Schmidt & S. J. Segalowitz (Eds.), Developmental psychophysiology: Theory, systems, and methods (pp. 173–212). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Richards, J. E. (2008). Attention in young infants: A developmental psychophysiological perspective. In C. A. Nelson & M. Luciana (Eds.), Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed., pp. 479–497). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Richards, J. E. (2010). The development of attention to simple and complex visual stimuli in infants: Behavioral and psychophysiological measures. Developmental Review, 30, 203–219.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Richards, J. E., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Attentional inertia in children’s extended looking at television. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 32, pp. 163–212). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  58. Richards, M. N., & Calvert, S. L. (2016). Media characters, parasocial relationships, and the social aspects of children’s learning across media platforms. In R. Barr & D. N. Linebarger (Eds.), Media exposure during infancy and early childhood: The effects of content and context on learning and development. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45102-2_9.Google Scholar
  59. Richards, J. E., & Casey, B. J. (1991). Heart-rate variability during attention phases in young infants. Psychophysiology, 28, 43–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Richards, J. E., & Cronise, K. (2000). Extended visual fixation in the early preschool years: Look duration, heart rate changes, and attentional inertia. Child Development, 71, 602–620.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Richards, J. E., & Gibson, T. L. (1997). Extended visual fixation in young infants: Look distributions, heart rate changes, and attention. Child Development, 68, 1041–1056. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Richards, J. E., & Turner, E. D. (2001). Extended visual fixation and distractibility in children from six to twenty-four months of age. Child Development, 72, 963–972. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Rideout, V. (2013). Zero to eight: Children’s media use in America 2013. Retrieved from http://www.commonsensemedia.org
  64. Roseberry, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Parish-Morris, J. (2009). Live action: Can young children learn verbs from video? Child Development, 80, 1360–1375. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01338.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Roseberry, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2014). Skype me! Socially contingent interactions help toddlers learn language. Child Development. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12166.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Schmidt, M. E., Crawley-Davis, A. M., & Anderson, D. R. (2007). Two-year-olds’ object retrieval based on television: Testing a perceptual account. Media Psychology, 9, 389–410. doi: 10.1080/15213260701291346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schmidt, M. E., Pempek, T. A., Kirkorian, H. L., Lund, A. F., & Anderson, D. R. (2008). The effects of background television on the toy play behavior of very young children. Child Development, 79, 1137–1151.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Schmitt, K. L., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Television and reality: Toddlers’ use of visual information from video to guide behavior. Media Psychology, 4(1), 51–76. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0401_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schmitt, K. L., Anderson, D. R., & Collins, P. A. (1999). Form and content: Looking at visual features of television. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1156–1167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Shaddy, D. J., & Colombo, J. (2004). Developmental changes in infant attention to dynamic and static stimuli. Infancy, 5, 355–365. doi: 10.1207/s15327078in0503_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sharon, T., & DeLoache, J. S. (2003). The role of perseveration in children’s symbolic understanding and skill. Developmental Science, 6(3), 289–296. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Singer, J. L. (1980). The power and limits of television: A cognitive-affective analysis. In P. Tannenbaum (Ed.), The entertainment function of television (pp. 312–360). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  73. Stelmach, L., Tam, W. J., & Hearty, P. (1991). Static and dynamic spatial resolution in image coding: An investigation of eye movements. Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display II, 1453, 147–152. doi: 10.1117/12.44351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Strouse, G. A., & Troseth, G. L. (2008). “Don’t try this at home”: Toddlers’ imitation of new skills from people on video. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101, 262–280. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.05.010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Suddendorf, T. (2003). Early representational insight: Twenty-four-month-olds can use a photo to find an object in the world. Child Development, 74, 896–904. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00574.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Taylor, G., & Herbert, J. S. (2013). Eye tracking infants: Investigating the role of attention during learning on recognition memory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54, 14–19. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Taylor, G., & Herbert, J. S. (2014). Infant and adult visual attention during an imitation demonstration. Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 770–782. doi: 10.1002/dev.21147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Tosi, V., Mecacci, L., & Pasquali, E. (1997). Scanning eye movements made when viewing film: Preliminary observations. International Journal of Neuroscience, 92, 47–52. doi: 10.3109/00207459708986388.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Troseth, G. L. (2003). TV guide: Two-year-old children learn to use video as a source of information. Developmental Psychology, 39, 140–150. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.39.1.140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Troseth, G. L. (2010). Is it life or is it Memorex? Video as a representation of reality. Developmental Review, 30, 155–175. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2010.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Troseth, G. L., & DeLoache, J. S. (1998). The medium can obscure the message: Young children’s understanding of video. Child Development, 69, 950–965. doi: 10.2307/1132355.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Troseth, G. L., Saylor, M. M., & Archer, A. H. (2006). Young children’s use of video as socially relevant information. Child Development, 77, 786–799. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00903.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Troseth, G., Casey, A., Lawver, K., Walker, J., & Cole, D. (2007). Naturalistic experience and the early use of symbolic artifacts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8, 309–331. doi: 10.1080/15248370701446772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tseng, P. H., Carmi, R., Cameron, I. G. M., Munoz, D. P., & Itti, L. (2009). Quantifying centre bias of observers in free viewing of dynamic natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 9, 1–16. doi: 10.1167/9.7.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zack, E., Barr, R., Gerhardstein, P., Dickerson, K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2009). Infant imitation from television using novel touch screen technology. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 13–26. doi: 10.1348/026151008X334700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Hollins UniversityRoanokeUSA
  3. 3.University of California-RiversideRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations