Towards a Research Framework of Computer-Supported Organizational Participation

  • Thomas Wagenknecht
  • René Filpe
  • Christof Weinhardt
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9821)

Abstract

Employees demand high responsibility and empowerment, while keeping their work communal and flexible. Initiatives that foster organizational participation can contribute to the fulfilment of such work conditions. Research in sociology and psychology demonstrated positive effects on job satisfaction as well as productivity. However, although adoption of social software is widely spread in firms, research on the determinants of computer-supported organizational participation is scarce. We conduct 20 guided expert interviews to propose a research framework for computer-supported organizational participation. We describe the elements to consider when designing processes that aim to be beneficial for both the employer as well as the employees. Building on the expert interviews, our process model includes a topic horizon and a collaboration phase, which creates proposals that have to be decided on in order to produce results. We show how employee competence and leadership commitment are as important as the workload and supporting features as well as an option for anonymous communication. We propose a set of features and discuss implications for researchers and practitioners.

Keywords

Organizational participation eParticipation Group decision support systems Expert interviews 

References

  1. 1.
    Spagnoletti, P., Resca, A., Lee, G.: A design theory for digital platforms supporting online communities: a multiple case study. J. Inf. Technol. 30(4), 364–380 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leonardi, P.M., Huysman, M., Steinfield, C.: Enterprise social media. Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 19(1), 1–19 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castells, M.: The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tumasjan, A., Strobel, M., Welpe, I.M.: Employer brand building for start-ups. Which job attributes do employees value most. J. Bus. Econ. 81(6), 111–136 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wegge, J., et al.: Promoting work motivation in organizations. J. Pers. Psychol. 9(4), 154–171 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilkinson, A., et al. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Participation in Organizations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Majumdar, A., Krishna, S., Bjorn, P.: Managers’ perceptions of social software use in the workplace. Identifying the benefits of social software and emerging patterns of its use. In: Proceedings of the 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AISeL) (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panopoulou, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: Success factors in designing eParticipation initiatives. Inf. Organ. 24(4), 195–213 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greenberg, E.S.: The consequences of worker participation: a clarification of the theoretical literature. Soc. Sci. Q. 56(2), 191–209 (1975)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dachler, H.P., Wilpert, B.: Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations. A critical evaluation. Adm. Sci. Q. 23(1), 1–39 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vranicki, P.: Socialism and the problem of alienation. Praxis 1, 307–317 (1965)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kanter, R.M.: Men and Women of the Corporation. Basic Books, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilkinson, A.: Empowerment: theory and practice. Pers. Rev. 27(1), 40–56 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miller, K.I., Monge, P.R.: Participation, satisfaction, and productivity. A meta-analytic review. Acad. Manag. J. 29(4), 727–753 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spreitzer, G.M.: Psychological empowerment in the workplace. Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Manag. J. 38(5), 1442–1465 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Humborstad, S.I.W.: When industrial democracy and empowerment go hand-in-hand. A co-power approach. Econ. Indus. Democr. 35(3), 391–411 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harrison, J.S., Freeman, R.E.: Special topic. Democracy in and around organizations. Is organizational democracy worth the effort. Acad. Manag. Exec. 18(3), 49–53 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pfeffer, J., Cialdini, R.B., Hanna, B., Knopoff, K.: Faith in supervision and the self-enhancement bias. Two psychological reasons why managers don’t empower workers. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 20(4), 313–321 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brown, J.D.: Evaluations of self and others. Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Soc. Cogn. 4(4), 353–376 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Markey, R., Ravenswood, K., Webber, D.J., Knudsen, H.: Influence at work and the desire for more influence. J. Ind. Relat. 55(4), 507–526 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scholl, W., Schermuly, C., Klocke, U.: Wissensgewinnung durch Führung. Die Vermeidung von Informationspathologien durch Kompetenzen für Mitarbeiter (Empowerment). In: Grote, S. (ed.) Die Zukunft der Führung, pp. 391–413. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arnold, J.A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J.A., Drasgow, F.: The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. J. Organ. Behav. 21(3), 249–269 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Desanctis, G., Gallupe, R.B.: A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Manag. Sci. 33(5), 589–609 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Postmes, T., Lea, M.: Social processes and group decision making. Anonymity in group decision support systems. Ergonomics 43(8), 1252–1274 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Briggs, R.O., Nunamaker, J.F., Sprague, R.H.: 1001 unanswered research questions in GSS. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 14(3), 3–21 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stroebe, W., Diehl, M.: Why groups are less effective than their members. On productivity losses in idea-generating groups. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 5(1), 271–303 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Smith, S., Panopoulou, E., Tarabanis, K., Millard, J.: Understanding eParticipation state of play in Europe. Inf. Syst. Manag. 29(4), 321–330 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bayley, C., French, S.: Designing a participatory process for stakeholder involvement in a societal decision. Group Decis. Negot. 17(3), 195–210 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Richter, A., Heidemann, J., Klier, M., Behrendt, S.: Success measurement of enterprise social networks. In: 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weston, C.: Analyzing interview data the development and evolution of a coding system. Qual. Sociol. 24(3), 381–400 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Los Angeles (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Klein, M., Garcia, A.C.B.: High-speed idea filtering with the bag of lemons. Decis. Support Syst. 78, 39–50 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Behrens, J., Kistner, A., Nitsche, A., Swierczek, B.: The Principles of LiquidFeedback. Interaktive Demokratie eV, Berlin (2014)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., Sarsa, H.: Does gamification work. A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In: Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3025–3034 (2014)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Blei, D.M., Lafferty, J.D.: Topic models. In: Text Mining. Classification, Clustering, and Applications, p. 71. CRC Press (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Wagenknecht
    • 1
  • René Filpe
    • 1
  • Christof Weinhardt
    • 2
  1. 1.FZI Research Centre for Information TechnologyBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations