Consolidation of Episodic Memory: An Epiphenomenon of Semantic Learning
Two hypotheses dominate the literature on systems consolidation of episodic memory: the transfer hypothesis and the transformation hypothesis. The former postulates a transfer of episodic memory from a fast-learning hippocampus to a slow-learning neocortex. The latter postulates that only the hippocampus genuinely stores episodic memories, and that systems consolidation arises due to multiple memory traces in the hippocampus and a transformation of episodic into semantic memories. While both hypotheses are supported by some evidence, they are contradicted by other, and hence remain controversial. Here, I suggest a new account of systems consolidation. It is based on the transformation hypothesis and introduces two modifications. First, episodic and semantic memory differ in their representational format, which is optimized for different purposes: Rigid sequences for episodic memories and flexible representations for semantic memory. Second, multiple memory traces in the hippocampus are not required to account for the temporal gradient of retrograde amnesia, if there is any. To this end, slow semantic learning from episodic memories suffices. The main hypothesis that I propose in this chapter is that systems consolidation is an epiphenomenon of semantic learning from episodic memory.
KeywordsEpisodic memory Semantic memory Hippocampus CRISP Sequence analysis
I thank Jing Fang and Richard Görler for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), grant 01GQ1506, and by the Stiftung Mercator.
- Buhry L, Azizi AH, Cheng S (2011) Reactivation, replay, and preplay: how it might all fit together. Neural Plast 2011:203462Google Scholar
- Cermak LS (1984) The episodic-semantic distinction in amnesia. In: Squire LR, Butters N (eds) Neuropsychology of memory. Guilford Press, New York, pp 55–62Google Scholar
- Cheng S, Werning M (2016) What is Episodic Memory if it is a Natural Kind? Synthese 193:1345–1385 Google Scholar
- Müller GE, Pilzecker A (1900) Experimentelle Beiträge zur Lehre vom Gedächtnis. Zeitschrift für Psychol Ergänzungsband 1:1–300Google Scholar
- Quillian MR (1966) Semantic memory. Bedford, MAGoogle Scholar
- Schacter DL (2002) The seven sins of memory: how the mind forgets and remembers. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Suddendorf T (2013) The gap: the science of what separates us from other animals. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Tulving E (1972) Episodic and semantic memory. In: Tulving E, Donaldson W (eds) Organization of memory. Academic Press Inc., New York, pp 381–402Google Scholar
- Werning M, Cheng S (2014) Is episodic memory a natural kind?—A defense of the sequence analysis. In: Bello P, Guarini M, McShane M, Scassellati B (eds) Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the cognitive science society. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX, pp 964–969Google Scholar