Advertisement

Demon Hunt - The Role of Endsley’s Demons of Situation Awareness in Maritime Accidents

  • Tim Claudius Stratmann
  • Susanne Boll
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9856)

Abstract

Human Error is the cause of most maritime accidents. In a majority of the cases the source of the Human Error is a lack of Situation Awareness. Endsley et al. have identified eight causes that corrupt the Situation Awareness of human operators, the so-called Demons of Situation Awareness (SA Demons). We analyzed over five-hundred maritime accident reports for each of the eight SA Demons to provide a ranking of the causes and to identify the most prominent ones. Addressing these SA Demons enables maritime system designers to enhance the Situation Awareness of maritime operators and thereby improves the safety at sea.

Keywords

Situation awareness Accident analysis Maritime Human Error 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Ministry of Science and Culture of Lower Saxony for supporting us with the graduate school Safe Automation of Maritime Systems (SAMS).

References

All links were last followed on April 15, 2016.

  1. 1.
    Antão, P., Guedes Suares, C., Grande, O., Trucco, P.: Analysis of maritime accident data with bbn models. In: Martorell et al. (eds.) Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications. Taylor & Francis Group, London (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker, C., McCafferty, D.: Accident database review of human element concerns: what do the results mean for classification?. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Human Factors in Ship Design and Operation, RINA Feb. Citeseer (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker, C.C., Seah, A.K.: Maritime accidents and human performance: the statistical trail. In: MarTech Conference, Singapore (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    de la Campa Portela, R.: Maritime casualties analysis as a tool to improve research about human factors on maritime environment. J. Marit. Res. 2(2), 3–18 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chauvin, C., Lardjane, S., Morel, G., Clostermann, J.P., Langard, B.: Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: analysis of collisions at sea using the hfacs. Accid. Anal. Prev. 59, 26–37 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 37(1), 32–64 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Endsley, M.R.: Situation awareness and human error: designing to support human performance. In: Proceedings of the High Consequence Systems Surety Conference, pp. 2–9. Lawrence Eribaum Associates (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Endsley, M.R., Jones, D.G.: SA demons: the enemies of situation awareness. In: Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design, chap. 3, pp. 31–41. CRC Press (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grech, M.R., Horberry, T., Smith, A.: Human error in maritime operations: analyses of accident reports using the leximancer tool. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. vol. 46, pp. 1718–1721. SAGE Publications (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koester, T.: Human error in the maritime work domain. In: Proceedings of 20th European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and Manual Control, pp. 149–158 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller, G.A.: Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rothblum, A.M.: Human error and marine safety. In: National Safety Council Congress and Expo, Orlando, FL (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wagenaar, W.A., Groeneweg, J.: Accidents at sea: Multiple causes and impossible consequences. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 27(5), 587–598 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Carl von Ossietzky Universität OldenburgOldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations