Participatory Practices in London Urban Strategies: The Example of Bankside in the Borough of Southwark

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

In the United Kingdom people have realized that the traditional centralized government, characterized by a top-down approach, does not improve people lives. On the contrary, it generates bureaucracy and makes people feel constrained and deceived rather than included in the decision-making process and among the makers of their future, as it should be in a healthy democracy. For this reason, great power was devolved from the central government to local authorities, local communities, neighborhoods, and individuals through the approval of the Localism Act of 2011. This paper briefly introduces the act and analyzes Community’s engagement in the planning process and in the regeneration program in the district of Bankside, in the London Borough of Southwark. It is articulated via the following parts: the introduction, the description of the Localism Act, the presentation of the process of definition of the Neighbourhood Plan, the illustration of the Neighbourhood Plan of Bankside, the exposition of the experiences with the Bankside program, the regeneration program of Bankside, which includes the description of the various organizations that operate in the area, and the illustration of the various activities carried out in the area to involve the local community, the evaluation of community engagement with a particular focus on the case study, and the conclusion. The paper shows the positive impact of community involvement in planning processes and provides recommendations for policy makers based on the successful practices in the neighborhood of Bankside. In addition, recommendations for further research are provided at the end.

Keywords

Participatory practices Community participation Engagement Neighborhood planning Social model 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special thanks are due to Prof. Corrado Zoppi for his invaluable collaboration and precious advice that greatly enriched the research. Deepest gratitude is due to Alex Barton Cáceres for his meticulous proofreading and for his constant support and encouragement during the paper editing. I am also grateful to the anonymous referee for the constructive comments on the initial version of this article.

References

  1. Batty, E., Beatty, C., Foden, M., Lawless, P., Pearson, S., & Wilson, I. (2010). Involving local people in regeneration: Evidence from the new deal for communities programme. London, UK: Communities and Local Government Publications.Google Scholar
  2. BBC. (2002). Changing places. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/changingplaces_20020308.shtml.
  3. Better Bankside. (2012). Bankside urban forest. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from http://www.betterbankside.co.uk/buf.
  4. Better Bankside. (2015). Local people creating inspirational green spaces in inner-city London. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://www.sustainweb.org/pdf/lfl_carole_write.pdf.
  5. Bevan, S. (2011). Deliverability. In: Neighborhood planning vanguards. London: London Borough of Southwark.Google Scholar
  6. Blackfriars Settlement. (2015). What we do. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from http://www.blackfriars-settlement.org.uk/whatwedo.
  7. BOST (Bankside Open Space Trust). (2015a). Garden at Tate Modern. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://www.bost.org.uk/open-places/tate-modern-community-garden/.
  8. BOST (Bankside Open Space Trust). (2015b). About BOST. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from http://www.bost.org.uk/about-bost/.
  9. BOST (Bankside Open Space Trust). (2015c). Gardens & open spaces. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://www.bost.org.uk/open-places/.
  10. BOST (Bankside Open Space Trust). (2015d). Garden at tate modern. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://www.bost.org.uk/open-places/tate-modern-community-garden/.
  11. Botes, L., & van Rensburg, D. (2000). Community participation in development: Nine plagues and twelve commandments. Community Development Journal, 35(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. BRF (Bankside Residents’ Forum). (2015). Bankside residents’ forum. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from https://www.linkedin.com/company/bankside-residents’-forum.
  13. Campbell, P. (2011). Community-led regeneration: a review of literature. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research.Google Scholar
  14. Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development: Putting the last first. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Chetwyn, D. (2013). Locality neighborhood plans roadmap guide. Locality and Urban Vision Enterprise CIC, Burslem School of Art, Stoke-on-Trent.Google Scholar
  17. Day, D. (1997). Citizen participation in the planning process: An essentially contested process? Journal of planning Literature, 11(3), 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DCLG (Department for Communities and Local Government). (2010). Decentralization and the Localism Bill: an essential guide. London: Bressenden Place.Google Scholar
  19. DCLG (Department for Communities and Local Government). (2011). A plain english guide to the localism bill. London: Bressenden Place.Google Scholar
  20. Duncan, P., & Thomas, S. (2000). Neighbourhood regeneration: Resourcing community involvement. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  21. Elwood, S. (2004). Partnerships and participation: Reconfiguring urban governance in different state contexts. Urban Geography, 25(8), 755–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaigher, M. J., Van Rensburg, H. C. J., & Bester, A. N. J. (1995). Health and development: The Venda care group organisation. Development Southern Africa, 12(2), 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hendler, C. (2009). Obama on Recovery.gov. Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved March 24, 2015, from http://www.cjr.org/the_kicker/obama_on_recoverygov.php.
  24. Hickey, S., & Mohan, G. (2005). Relocating participation within a radical politics of development. Development and Change, 36(2), 237–262.Google Scholar
  25. Hyslop, D. (2012). Culture, regeneration and community: Reinventing the city. International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 5, 152–165.Google Scholar
  26. Hyslop, D., Griffin, S., & Minhas, S. (2015). Tate_RCP Strategy.Google Scholar
  27. Irvin, R., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. K1 (2015). Interviewed by Francesca Leccis. 16 July.Google Scholar
  29. K2 (2015). Interviewed by Francesca Leccis. 14 July.Google Scholar
  30. K3 (2015). Interviewed by Francesca Leccis. 28 July.Google Scholar
  31. Kimpton, B., Gedge, D., & Grant, G. (2012). London bridge business improvement district (BID) green infrastructure audit and feasibility study. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Better%20Bankside.pdf.
  32. London Borough of Richmond upon Thames. (2012). Neighborhood planning protocol. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from http://www.richmond.gov.uk/updated_neighbourhood_planning_protocol_feb_2014.pdf.
  33. London SE1. (2015). Community film club. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://www.london-se1.co.uk/groups/community-film-club.
  34. Merge. (2015). About. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from http://mergefestival.co.uk/about/.
  35. ODS Consulting (Organizational Development Services). (2006). Evaluation of the effective engagement of communities in regeneration. Edinburgh: Communities Scotland.Google Scholar
  36. Parliament. (2011). Localism act 2011. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2010–11/localism.html.
  37. Planning Aid England (2015). We are bankside: A case study about engaging businesses in neighbourhood planning. Retrieved October 24, 2015, from http://www.ourneighbourhoodplanning.org.uk/case-studies/view/487.
  38. SCDC (Scottish Community Development Centre). (2005). The 10 national standards for community engagement. Retrieved March 23, 2015, from http://www.scdc.org.uk/what/national-standards/10-national-standards/.
  39. Sifry, M. L. (2010). You can be the eyes and ears: Barak Obama and the Wisdom of Crowds. In: Lathrop, D., Ruma, L. (Eds.), Open government. collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice (1st edn., pp. 117–124) Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  40. Southwark Council. (2014). Neighborhood planning in Bankside. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from http://www.southwark.gov.uk/info/200413/neighbourhood_planning/2857/neighbourhood_planning_in_bankside.
  41. Southwark Council. (2015). Bankside urban forest. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from http://www.southwark.gov.uk/info/200189/frameworks_strategies_and_programmes_of_work/1230/bankside_urban_forest.
  42. Tate. (2012a). Tate modern project: Community project: Skirt of the Black Mouth. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from http://www.tate.org.uk/about/projects/tate-modern-project/community/tate-modern-project-community-project-skirt-black-mouth.
  43. Tate. (2012b). Tate modern project: Community project: walkways. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from http://www.tate.org.uk/about/projects/tate-modern-project/community/tate-modern-project-community-project-walkways.
  44. Tate. (2013). Merge. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from http://www.tate.org.uk/about/projects/tate-modern-project/community/merge.
  45. Tate. (2015a). Visiting the garden. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://www.tate.org.uk/about/projects/tate-modern-community-garden/visiting-garden.
  46. Tate. (2015b). Tate Modern community garden. Accessed at: http://www.tate.org.uk/about/projects/tate-modern-community-garden [19/10/2015].
  47. Tate. (2015c). Steering group. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://www.tate.org.uk/about/projects/tate-modern-community-garden/steering-group.
  48. Tate. (2015d). Tate Modern community film club. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://www.tate.org.uk/about/projects/tate-modern-project/community/tate-modern-community-film-club.
  49. Tate. (2015e). Local communities. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://www.tate.org.uk/learn/local-communities.
  50. Tate. (2015f). Community private views. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://www.tate.org.uk/about/projects/tate-modern-project/community/community-private-views.
  51. Tate. (2015g). Tate modern project: Community project: Tate modern and you. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://www.tate.org.uk/about/projects/tate-modern-project/community/tate-modern-and-you.
  52. Taylor, M. (2000). Communities in the lead: Power organisational capacity and social capital. Urban Studies, 37(5–6), 1019–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. The Means. (2015). Better bankside BID. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://www.themeans.co.uk/projects/better-bankside-bid.
  54. We are Bankside. (2015). What is the bankside neighborhood plan?. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from http://www.wearebankside.com/what-bankside-neighbourhood-plan.
  55. Wilkinson, D., & Applebee, E. (1999). Implementing holistic government: Joined-up action on the ground. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DICAARUniversità degli Studi di CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations