Effect of Pre- and Postsynaptic Firing Patterns on Synaptic Competition

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9886)

Abstract

Synaptic plasticity is known to depend on the timing of pre and postsynaptic spikes, a.k.a. spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). This implies that outcomes brought about by STDP should be sensitive to the dynamic properties of pre and postsynaptic neuron activity. Furthermore, because the classical model of STDP does not consider the effect of various pre and postsynaptic spike patterns on the outcome, it fails to reproduce the dependence of the synaptic plasticity polarity, namely the long-term potentiation or depression, on firing rates. In this study, we investigated the interplay between realistic pre and postsynaptic dynamic property models and a modified STDP model, reproducing the firing rate dependency. Our results showed that strengthened synapses depend on a combination of pre and postsynaptic properties as well as input firing rates, suggesting that a postsynaptic neuron may favor specific spike statistics and input firing rates may facilitate this tendency.

Keywords

STDP Synaptic competition Inter-spike intervals MAT model 

References

  1. 1.
    Markram, H., Lubke, J., Frotscher, M., Sakmann, B.: Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science 275, 213–215 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bi, G.-Q., Poo, M.-M.: Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J. Neurosci. 18, 10464–10472 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bliss, T.V., Lomo, T.: Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J. Physiol. 232, 331–356 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shinomoto, S., Miyazaki, Y., Tamura, H., Fujita, I.: Regional and laminar differences in in vivo firing patterns of primate cortical neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 567–575 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ito, H., Kitano, K.: Pre- and postsynaptic properties regulate synaptic competition through spike-timing-dependent plasticity. In: Wermter, S., Weber, C., Duch, W., Honkela, T., Koprinkova-Hristova, P., Magg, S., Palm, G., Villa, A.E.P. (eds.) ICANN 2014. LNCS, vol. 8681, pp. 733–740. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kobayashi, R., Tsubo, Y., Shinomoto, S.: Made-to-order spiking neuron model equipped with a multi-timescale adaptive threshold. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 3, 9 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Song, S., Miller, K.D., Abbott, L.F.: Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 919–926 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cateau, H., Fukai, T.: A stochastic method to predict the consequence of arbitrary forms of spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Neural Comput. 15, 597–620 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pfister, J.P., Gerstner, W.: Triplets of spikes in a model of spike-timing-dependent plasticity. J. Neurosci. 26, 9673–9682 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human and Computer IntelligenceRitsumeikan UniversityKusatsuJapan

Personalised recommendations