VNA Calibration Comparison

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the PoliTO Springer Series book series (PTSS)

Abstract

A VNA calibration procedure characterizes and reduces the systematic errors of the instrumentation from the raw measurement data. The measurement accuracy mainly depends on the quality of the VNA calibration. Therefore, the choice of the calibration procedure is very critical. The goal of this chapter is present a comparison of the state of the art 2-port VNA calibration techniques at millimetre frequencies. This comparison will be useful to analyze the efficiency of two different VNA calibration techniques.

Keywords

Calibration Technique Uncertainty Evaluation Device Under Test Combine Standard Uncertainty Load Standard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Hiebel M, (2007) “Fundamentals of Vector Network Analysis”, 2nd edn, Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co., Germany. ISBN 978-3-939837-06-0Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eul HJ, Schiek B (1991) A generalized theory and new calibration procedures for network analyzer self-calibration. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 39(4):724–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kruppa W, Sodomsky KF (1971) “An explicit solution for the scattering parameters of a linear two-port measured with an imperfect test set”, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-19(1): 122–123Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rehnmark S (1974) On the calibration process of automatic network analyzer systems. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 22(4):457–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Engen GF (1974) “Calibration technique for automated network analyzers with application to adapter evaluation”, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. MTT-22:1255–1260Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Franzen NR, Speciale RA (1975) “A new procedure for System Calibration and error removal in automated Sparameter measurements”. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Microwave Conference (Hamburg) pp 69–73Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fitzpatrick J (1978) Error models for system measurement. Microwave Journal 21:63–66MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Padmanabhan S, Kirby P, Daniel J, Dunleavy L (2003) “Accurate broadband on-wafer SOLT calibrations with complex load and thru models”, In: Proceedings of the 61st ARFTG Microwave Measurements Conference Berlin,Springer, p. 5–10Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blackham D, Wong K (2005) Latest advances in VNA accuracy enhancements. Microwave Journal 48:78–94Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ridler N, Nazoa N (2006) “Using simple calibration load models to improve accuracy of vector network analyser measurements”, In: Proceedings of the 67th ARFTG Microwave Measurements Conference, Springer, Berlin, pp. 104–110Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Engen GF, Hoer CA (1978) “The Application of “Thru-Short-Delay” to the Calibration of the Dual Six-Port”, IEEE-MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, pp. 184–185Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Engen GF, Hoer CA (1979) “Thru-Load-Delay: An Improved Technique for Calibrating the Dual Six-Port”, IEEE-MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, p 53Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Engen GF, Hoer CA (1979) “Thru-reflect-line: An improved technique for calibrating the dual six port automatic network analyzer”, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. MTT-27: 987–993Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marks RB (1991) A multiline method of network analyzer calibration. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 39(7):1205–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williams DF, Wang JCM, Arz U (2003) An optimal vector-network-analyzer calibration algorithm. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 51(12):2391–2401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Williams DF, Marks RB, Davidson A (1991) “Comparison of on-wafer calibrations”, In: Proceedings of the 38th ARFTG Microwave Measurements Conference Fall, pp 68–81Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eul HJ, Schiek B (1988) “Thru-match-reflect: One result of a rigorous theory for de-embedding and network analyzer calibration”, In: Proceedings of the 18th European Microwave Conference Stockholm, Sweden, pp 909–914Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Soares RA, Gouzien P, Legaud P, Follot G (1989) A unified mathematical approach to two-port calibration techniques and some applications. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 37:1660–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Silvonen KI (1991) Calibration of test fixtures using at least two standards. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 39:624–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ferrero A, Pisani U (1992) Two-Port Network Analyzer calibration using an unknown thru. IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters 2(12):505–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferrero A, Pisani U (1991) “QSOLT: A new fast calibration algorithm for two port S parameter measurements”, In: Proceedings of the 38th ARFTG Conf. Dig., San Diego, CA, pp 15–24Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eul HJ, Schiek B (1991) Reducing the number of calibration standards for network analyzer calibration. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 40(4):732–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shoaib N (2012) A novel inconsistency condition for 2-port vector network analyzer calibration. Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 54(10):2372–2375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shoaib N, Sellone M, Ferrero A, Oberto L, Brunetti L (2013) “Error propagation with different calibration techniques at millimeter frequencies”, In: Proceedings of the 82nd ARFTG Microwave Measurement Symposium, Columbus, Ohio, USA, pp 1–3Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shoaib N, Sellone M, Oberto L, Brunetti L (2014) “Error propagation with TRL and QSOLT calibration techniques at millimeter frequencies”, INRIM technical report, T.R. 14/2014, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Garelli M, Ferrero A (2012) “A Unified Theory for S-parameter Uncertainty Evaluation”, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 60(12):3844–3855Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stumper U (2005) Uncertainty of VNA S-parameter measurement due to nonideal TRL calibration items. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Measure. 54:676–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Williams D, Wang C (2003) “An optimal multiline TRL calibration algorithm”, MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, pp 1819–1822Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sanpietro F, Ferrero A, Pisani U, Brunetti L (1995) “Accuracy of a multiport vector network analyzer”, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Measure. 44(2):304–307Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Martens J, Judge D, Bigelow J (2004) “Uncertainties associated with many-port (4) S-parameter measuremets using a four port vector network analyzer”, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. MTT-52(5):1361–1368Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stumper U (2007) Uncertainties of VNA S-parameter measurements applying the TAN self-calibration method. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Measure. 56:597–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    European Association of National Metrology Institutes (EURAMET), “EURAMET cg-12 v.2.0, guidelines on the evaluation of vector network analyzers (VNA)”, March 2011 [Online]. http://www.euramet.org/index.php?id=calibration-guides
  33. 33.
    Hoffmann J, Leuchtman P, Ruefenacht J, Wong K (2009) “S-parameters of slotted and slotless coaxial connectors”, In: Proceedings of the 74th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Symposium, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wollensack M (2012) “VNA Tools II: S-parameter uncertainty calculation”, In: Proceedings of the 79th ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference, p 1–5Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML, “JCGM 100:2008, evaluation of measurement data-Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Sep. 2008 [Online]. http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html
  36. 36.
    “HFE High Frequency Engineering Sagl Zona Industriale San Vittore (GR)”, Switzerland [Online]. http://www.HFEmicro.ch
  37. 37.
    Bellotti R (2013) Rapporto di prova n. 13–0323-01. Tech. Rep, Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca metrologica - INRIM, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Agilent, “Agilent Application Note 1287-11, Specifying Calibration Standards and Kits for Agilent Vector Network Analyzers”, [Online]. http://www.agilent.com

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Petroleum InstituteAbu DhabiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations