Is IEEE 802.11p V2X Obsolete Before it is Even Deployed?

  • Johannes Hiltscher
  • Robin Streiter
  • Gerd Wanielik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mobility book series (LNMOB)

Abstract

Years after publication of the IEEE 802.11p and IEEE 1609 standards for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSs), first production vehicles equipped with conforming communication hardware are about to become available. The standard’s suitability for the hard real-time automotive environment has been debated intensively in recent years. Most publications use synthetic message sizes, while the comprehensive ITS-G5 standard allows for a performance evaluation of IEEE 802.11p in real scenarios. Realistic performance and scalability assessments of current automotive communication hardware can be derived from such an evaluation. Based on these we examine the suitability of the available standards for demanding hard real-time control tasks as cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC).

Keywords

Intelligent transportation systems Cooperative awareness ITS-G5 IEEE 802.11p IEEE 1609 

References

  1. 1.
    Autolitano A, Campolo C, Molinaro A, Scopigno R, Vesco A (2013) An insight into decentralized congestion control techniques for VANETs from ETSI TS 102 687 V1.1.1. IFIP Wireless Days, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Böhm A, Jonsson M, Uhlemann E (2013) Performance evaluation of a platooning application using the IEEE 802.11p MAC on a control channel Vs. a centralized real-time MAC on a service channel. Available via www.diva-portal.org
  3. 3.
    Dierks T, Allen C (1999) RFC 2246: The TLS protocol Version 1.0. Internet Engineering Task ForceGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eichler S (2007) Performance evaluation of the IEEE 802.11p WAVE communication standard. In: IEEE 66th vehicular technology conference, pp 2199–2203Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ETSI EN 302 636-4-1 Vehicular communications; GeoNetworking; Part 4: geographical addressing and forwarding for point-to-point and point-to-multipoint communications; Sub-part 1: Media-Independent Functionality v1.2.1, European Telecommunication Standards Institute, 2014Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ETSI EN 302 636-5-1Vehicular communications; GeoNetworking; Part 5: transport protocols; sub-part 1: basic transport protocol v1.2.1. European Telecommunication Standards Institute, 2014Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ETSI EN 302 637-2 Vehicular communications; basic set of applications; Part 2: specification of cooperative awareness basic service v1.3.2. European Telecommunication Standards Institute, 2014Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ETSI EN 302 663 Access layer specification for intelligent transport systems operating in the 5 GHz frequency band v1.2.0. European Telecommunication Standards Institute, 2012Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ETSI EN 302 665 Communication architecture, v1.1.1. European Telecommunication Standards Institute, 2010Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ETSI TS 102 687 Decentralized congestion control mechanisms for intelligent transport systems operating in the 5 GHz range; Access layer part v1.1.1. European Telecommunication Standards Institute, 2011Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ETSI TS 102 894-2 Users and applications requirements; Part 2: applications and facilities layer common data dictionary v1.2.1. European Telecommunication Standards Institute, 2014Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ETSI TS 103 097 Security; security header and certificate formats v1.2.1. European Telecommunication Standards Institute, 2015Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    IEEE 1609.2-2012 (2012) Wireless access in vehicular environments—security services for applications and management messages. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ITU-T X.680 Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1): specification of basic notation. International Telecommunication Union, 2015Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ITU-T X.691 ASN.1 encoding rules: specification of packed encoding rules (PER). International Telecommunication Union, 2015Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jiang D, Delgrossi L (2008) IEEE 802.11p: Towards an international standard for wireless access in vehicular environments. In: Vehicular technology conference, pp 2036–2040Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krajzewicz D, Hertkorn G, Rössel C, Wagner P (2002) SUMO (Simulation of Urban MObility) - an open-source traffic simulation. In: 4th Middle east symposium on simulation and modelling, pp 183–187Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rondinone M, Maneros J, Krajzewicz D, Bauza R, Cataldi P, Hrizi F, Gozalvez J, Kumar V, Röckl M, Lin L, Lazaro O, Leguay J, Härri J, Vaz S, Lopez Y, Sepulcre M, Wetterwald M, Blokpoel R, Cartolano F (2013) iTETRIS: a modular simulation platform for the large scale evaluation of cooperative ITS applications. Simul Model Pract Theory 34:99–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schmidt-Eisenlohr F (2010) Interference in vehicle-to-vehicle communication networks. KIT Scientific Publishing, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sommer C, Dressler F (2008) Progressing toward realistic mobility models in VANET simulations. IEEE Commun Mag 46(11):132–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sommer C, German R, Dressler F (2011) Bidirectionally coupled network and road traffic simulation for improved IVC analysis. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 10(1):3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Varga A (2010) OMNeT++. In: Modelling and tools for network simulation. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vesco A, Scopigno R, Casetti C, Chiasserini C (2013) Investigating the effectiveness of decentralized congestion control in vehicular networks. In: IEEE globecom workshopsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Hiltscher
    • 1
  • Robin Streiter
    • 1
  • Gerd Wanielik
    • 1
  1. 1.Professorship of Communications Engineering, Technische Universität ChemnitzChemnitzGermany

Personalised recommendations