Advertisement

Proposing an Hourly Dynamic Wind Signal as an Environmental Incentive for Demand Response

  • Anders NilssonEmail author
  • Nils Brandt
Conference paper
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)

Abstract

Demand Response (DR) is expected to play a crucial role in balancing supply and demand in future smart grids with increased proportion of electricity from renewable sources. However, previous studies on price-based DR programs have shown that there is a substantial need to strengthen the incentive models in order to achieve sufficient end-user response. In addition, recent studies are starting to explore alternative incentives based on environmental performance as a support to dynamic pricing tariffs. In this paper, we investigate in the potential of using a dynamic wind signal, reflecting the hourly variations in wind power generation, as an environmental incentive for load shift in DR programs. A wind signal is constructed based on Swedish electricity generation data for 2014, and intraday and seasonally patterns of wind power generation are analyzed with respect to hourly electricity spot prices. The results show that a wind signal is supportive to the economic incentive of a dynamic price signal to stimulate intraday load shift by end-use customers; shifting electricity consumption from hours of high price and low wind power generation to hours of low price and high wind power generation, leading to both consumer cost-savings and reduced climate impact in the long term.

Keywords

Wind power Electricity spot price Demand response Smart grids Renewable energy 

References

  1. Albadi, M., & El-Saadany, E. (2008). A summary of demand response in electricity markets. Electric Power Systems Research, 78(11), 1989–1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amin, S. M., & Wollenberg, B. F. (2005). Toward a smart grid: Power delivery for the 21st century. IEEE Power Energy Magazine, 3(5), 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chardon, A., Almén, O., Lewis, P.E., Stromback, J., Château B. (2008) Demand Response: A decisive breakthrough for Europe. Capgemini in collaboration with VaasaEtt and Enerdata.Google Scholar
  4. Conejo, A. J., Morales, J. M., & Baringo, L. (2010). Real-time demand response model. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 1(3), 236–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Darby, S. (2006). The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption: A review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays. Oxford: Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Farhangi, H. (2010). The path of the smart grid. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 8(1), 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farugui, A., & Sergici, S. (2008). The power of experimentation: New evidence on residential demand response. Cambridge, MA: The Brattle Group.Google Scholar
  8. Faruqui, A., & George, S. (2005). Quantifying customer response to dynamic pricing. The Electricity Journal, 18(4), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faruqui, A., & Sergici, S. (2010). Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of the empirical evidence. Cambridge, MA: The Brattle Group.Google Scholar
  10. Faruqui, A., Hledik, R., & Sergici, S. (2009). Piloting the smart grid. The Electricity Journal, 22(7), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gellings, C. W. (1985). The concept of demand-side management for electric utilities. Proceedings of the IEEE, 73(10), 1468–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gottwalt, S., Ketter, W., Block, C., Collins, J., & Weinhardt, C. (2011). Demand side management—a simulation of household behavior under variable prices. Energy Policy, 39, 8163–8174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grande, O.S., Sæle, H. (2005). Market based solutions for increased flexibility in electricity consumption. In Conference proceedings of Security of supply on competitive electricity markets. Saltsjöbaden, Stockholm, June 7–8 2005.Google Scholar
  14. Ilic, M. D. (2007). From hierarchical to open access electric power systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(5), 1060–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ipakchi, A., & Albuyeh, F. (2009). Grid of the future. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 7(2), 52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobson, M. Z., & Delucchi, M. A. (2011). Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part I: Technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials. Energy Policy, 39, 1154–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirschen, D., & Strbac, G. (2004). Fundamentals of power system economics. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nilsson, A., Stoll, P., Brandt, N. (2015). Assessing the impact of real-time price visualization on residential electricity consumption, costs, and carbon emissions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling.Google Scholar
  19. Nordpool Spot. (2015). Historical market data. Nordpool Spot. Retrieved from http://www.nordpoolspot.com/historical-market-data/.
  20. Palensky, P., & Dietrich, D. (2011). Demand side management: Demand response, intelligent energy systems, and smart loads. IEEE Industrial Informatics, 7(3), 381–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rahimi, F., & Ipakchi, A. (2010). Demand response as a market resource under the smart grid paradigm. IEEE Transcations on Smart Grid, 1(1), 82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Siano, P. (2014). Demand response and smart grids—a survey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stokke, A. V., Doorman, G. L., & Ericson, T. (2010). An analysis of a demand charge electricity grid tariff in the residential sector. Energy Efficiency, 3, 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stoll, P., Brandt, N., & Nordström, L. (2013). Including dynamic CO2 intensity with demand response. Energy Policy, 65, 490–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Strbac, G. (2008). Demand side management: benefits and challenges. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4419–4426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Svenska Kraftnät (SvK). (2015). Electricity market statistics. Svenska Kraftnät. Retrieved from http://www.svk.se/aktorsportalen/elmarknad/statistik.
  27. Tan, Y. T., & Kirschen, D. (2007). Classification of control for demand-side participation. Manchester: The University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  28. The International Energy Agency (IEA). (2003). The power to choose—demand response in liberalized electricity markets. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  29. The Swedish Energy Agency (SEA). (2013). The electric certificate system 2013. The Swedish Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  30. The International Energy Agency (IEA). (2014). World energy outlook 2014. IEA.Google Scholar
  31. The Swedish Energy Agency (SEA). (2015). Wind power statistics 2014 (in Swedish). The Swedish Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  32. Torriti, J., Hassan, M. G., & Leach, M. (2010). Demand response experience in Europe: Policies, programmes and implementation. Energy, 35, 1575–1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. U.S. Department of Energy. (2006). Benefits of demand response in electricity markets and recommendations for achieving them. In A report to the United States Congress. Pursuant to Section 1252 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Google Scholar
  34. Xie, L., Young Joo, J., Ilic, M.D. (2009). Integration of intermittent resources with price- responsive loads. In NAPS conference 2009. North American.Google Scholar
  35. Xu, Z., Togeby, M., & Ostergaard, J. (2011). Demand as frequency controlled reserve. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 26(3), 1062–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Architecture and the Built EnvironmentRoyal Institute of Technology (KTH)StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations