The Design of the Estonian Governmental Document Exchange Classification Framework

  • Dirk Draheim
  • Kaarel Koosapoeg
  • Mihkel Lauk
  • Ingrid Pappel
  • Ingmar Pappel
  • Jaak Tepandi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9831)


The Digital Agenda 2020 for Estonia aims for a simpler state. A crucial success factor in making the public sector more effective and efficient is achieving a very high degree of paperless official communication. Therefore, in 2015, the Estonian government conducted an assessment of the document exchange between its authorities and institutions. Given the large number of 400 assessed organizations and the complexity of the task, the assessment needed extensive and systematic preparation. Hence, a tailored assessment framework, the so-called document exchange classification framework (DECF), has been developed for this purpose. This article explains the rationales and problems in the design of the DECF. The DECF enables the analysis of document exchanges between different kinds of information systems, via different channels and between different kinds of organizations. The feedback received with the help of the DECF allows for counting the volume and kind of documents that an organisation produces whilst providing a service. It helps to optimise the volume of produced documents and to optimise the service provision layer.


  1. 1.
    Artley, T., Blankenship, C., Dougan, M., Eathorne, R., Krantz, J.W., Richlie, G.: Action Learning Project Go Paperless! University of Michigan, Business & Finance Leadership Academy, Ann Arbor (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Department of Defense: Electronic Records Managment Software Applications Design Criteria Standard. DoD 5015.02-STD. Department of Defense, United States of America, April 2007Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Draheim, D., Weber, G.: Modeling submit/response style systems with form charts and dialogue constraints. In: Meersman, R. (ed.) OTM-WS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2889, pp. 267–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DLM-Forum Foundation. MoReq2010, Modular Requirements for Records Systems, vol. 1 - Core Services & Plug-in Modules. DLM Forum Foundation (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Durno, J.: A web-based model for electronic document exchange. J. Libr. Trends 54(3), 346–358 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Commission and DLM-Forum Foundation. MoReq2 - Model Requirements for the Management of Electronic Records. European Communities (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Interoparability Solutions for European Public Administrations (isa). European Interoperability Framework (EIF) for European Public Services. European Commission (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Interoparability Solutions for European Public Administrations (isa). Analysis of Structured e-Document Formats Used in Trans-European Systems - SC17DI06692 - D1.1 Survey on Standardized e-Document Formats. European Commission (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Metsallik-Koppel, R.: Elektroonilise dokumendivahetuse osakaal 2014 (The Share of Electronic Document Exchange in 2014). Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications, Information Society Services Development Department (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications. Digital Agenda 2020 for Estonia. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Norta, A., Grefen, P., Narendra, N.C.: A reference architecture for managing dynamic inter-organizational business processes. Data Knowl. Eng. 91, 52–89 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norta, A.: Creation of smart-contracting collaborations for decentralized autonomous organizations. In: Matulevičius, R., Dumas, M. (eds.) BIR 2015. LNBIP, vol. 229, pp. 3–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    OECD. OECD e-Government Studies Reaping the Benefits of ICTs in Spain - Strategic Study on Communication Infrastructures and Paperless Communication. OECD (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pappel, I., Pappel, I.: Implementation of Service-based e-Government, establishment of state IT components interoperability at local authorities. In: Proceedings of ICACC 2011 - the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Computer Control. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pappel, I., Pappel, I.: The service-oriented state, local authority - service orientation in public administration. In: Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference of Internet Applications and Research 2012. IADIS Press (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pappel, I., Pappel, I.: Integral and secure cloud architecture based system for backup and retention of public sector information. In: Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on of Internet Applications and Research 2012, Lisbon, pp. 105–110. IADIS Press (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tepandi, J., Lauk, M., Pappel, I., Koosapoeg, K.: Dokumendivahetusviiside analüüs ja hindamise mudel - Lõpparuanne (Document Exchange Pathways Analysis and Assessment Model - Final Report). AS PricewaterhouseCoopers Advisors (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (, which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk Draheim
    • 1
  • Kaarel Koosapoeg
    • 2
  • Mihkel Lauk
    • 2
  • Ingrid Pappel
    • 1
  • Ingmar Pappel
    • 3
  • Jaak Tepandi
    • 1
  1. 1.Tallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia
  2. 2.PricewaterhouseCoopersTallinnEstonia
  3. 3.Interinx Ltd.TallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations