Advertisement

A Retrospective Study on the 20 Years of the ADBIS Conference

  • Theodora Tsikrika
  • Yannis ManolopoulosEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 637)

Abstract

The East-European Conference in Advances in Data Bases & Information Systems (ADBIS) spans 20 years of life. Here, by using simple statistic measures and bibliographic analysis, we illustrate basic characteristics and features of ADBIS, i.e. the venues, persons and countries involved. Also, its international character, its competitiveness and its status in the community are revealed. Finally, prolific authors and countries are extracted, topics of interest are deduced, collaboration issues and citing performance are illuminated.

Keywords

Betweenness Centrality Bibliometric Analysis Citation Distribution Large Connected Component Prolific Author 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to L. Kalinichenko for information on the early years of ADBIS.

References

  1. 1.
    Bar-Ilan, J.: Which h-index? A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics 74(2), 257–271 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ceri, S., Kalinichenko, L., Kitsuregawa, M., Lu, H., Ozsoyoglu, Z.M., Snodgras, R., Vianu, V.: SIGMOD sister societies. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 29(1), 4–15 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elmacioglu, E., Lee, D.: On six degrees of separation in DBLP-DB and more. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 34(2), 33–40 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1(3), 215–239 (1978)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harzing, A.-W.: Citation analysis across disciplines: The impact of different data sources and citation metrics (2010). http://www.harzing.com/data_metrics_comparison.htm. Accessed May 2016
  6. 6.
    Ley, M.: DBLP: some lessons learned. Proc. VLDB Endowment 2(2), 1493–1500 (2009)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Manolopoulos, Y.: A statistic study for the ADBIS period 1994–2006. In: Local Proceedings of the 10th East-European Conference on Advances in Databases & Information Systems (ADBIS), pp. 247–266 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the web (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rahm, E., Thor, A.: Citation analysis of database publications. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 34, 48–53 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thornley, C.V., Johnson, A.C., Smeaton, A.F., Lee, H.: The scholarly impact of TRECVid (2003–2009). JASIST 62(4), 613–627 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsikrika, T., Larsen, B., Müller, H., Endrullis, S., Rahm, E.: The scholarly impact of CLEF (2000–2009). In: Forner, P., Müller, H., Paredes, R., Rosso, P., Stein, B. (eds.) CLEF 2013. LNCS, vol. 8138, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsikrika, T., de Herrera, A.G.S., Müller, H.: Assessing the scholarly impact of ImageCLEF. In: Forner, P., Gonzalo, J., Kekäläinen, J., Lalmas, M., de Rijke, M. (eds.) CLEF 2011. LNCS, vol. 6941, pp. 95–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research and Technology HellasThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Department of InformaticsAristotle UniversityThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations