Advertisement

The Mindful Self in Space and Time

  • Jack Petranker
Chapter
Part of the Mindfulness in Behavioral Health book series (MIBH)

Abstract

The contemporary mindfulness movement emphasizes cultivating present-centered awareness. While this simple practice seems to offer real benefits, it has been criticized on the grounds that it psychologizes the Buddhist teachings on which it relies and, in doing so, discards the Buddha’s central concern: undoing fundamental forms of ignorance and craving that fuel the fires of samsaric suffering. Supporters reply that linking the practice of mindfulness to such traditional teachings would erect a needless barrier to its benefits; some also maintain that mindfulness as they present it preserves and updates what is most central to Buddhism. This chapter sidesteps this debate by introducing a different way of being mindful, one that focuses on the fullness of space rather than the present-centered immediacy of time. The basic practice is to investigate the space, or field, within which appearances arise rather than the specific appearances themselves. Field-centered mindfulness builds on present-centered mindfulness, but introduces a fundamentally different orientation to the stream of experiences and appearances we encounter. In doing so, it challenges the standard subject/object framework, which receives little if any attention in the practice of present-centered mindfulness. Without requiring practitioners to study and accept Buddhist doctrines or a Buddhist worldview, a space-centered approach offers a way of seeing that seems congruent with key Buddhist insights. For this reason, it has the potential to become what ancient Western philosophers called a therapeia, a cure for the existential ailment characteristic of our times.

Keywords

Mindfulness Space Field Framework Therapeia Tarthang Tulku Self 

References

Canonical Texts

  1. Arittha Sutta (SN 54,6) Trans. Thanissaro Bhikkhu. http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn54/sn54.006.than.html. Accessed December 26, 2015.
  2. Bhaddekaratta Sutta, MN 131. Trans. Bhikkhu Ñanananda. http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.131.nana.html. Accessed February 6, 2016.
  3. Tevijja Sutta, DN 13. Trans. Nyanaponika Thera. http://www.buddhanet.net/ss02.htm. Accessed December 26, 2015.

Secondary Sources

  1. Bruner, J. (1987). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Carette, J., & King, R. (2005). Selling spirituality: The silent takeover of religion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Cogan, J. (2016). The phenomenological reduction. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.iep.utm.edu/phen-red/. Accessed February 14, 2016.
  4. Cornford, F. M. (1936). The invention of space. In G. Murray & H. A. L. Fischer (Eds.), Essays in honour of Gilbert Murray (pp. 215–235). London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  5. Dennett, D. (1986). The self as narrative center of gravity. In F. Kessel, P. Cole, & D. Johnson (Eds.), Self and consciousness: Multiple perspectives. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Dreyfus, G. (2011). Is mindfulness present-centred and non-judgmental? A discussion of the cognitive dimensions of mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dreyfus, H., & Taylor, C. (2015). Retrieving realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ganeri, J. (2007). The concealed art of the soul: Theories of self and practices of truth in Indian ethics and epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ganeri, J., & Carlisle, C. (2010). Philosophy as therapeia. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement (Vol. 66, pp. 187–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gethin, R. (1998). The foundations of Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Goldstein, J. (2003). One Dharma: The emerging western Buddhism. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  12. Goldstein, J. (2016). Who knows: An interview with Joseph Goldstein. Tricycle. Spring 2016.Google Scholar
  13. Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a way of life (M. Chase, Trans.) Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published 1981)Google Scholar
  14. Healy, R. (2008). Holism and nonseparability in physics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/physics-holism/#OHQM. Accessed December 27, 2015.
  15. Huntington, C. W, Jr. (2015). The triumph of narcissism: Theravāda Buddhist meditation in the marketplace. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 83(3), 624–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and the transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1936)Google Scholar
  17. Husserl, E. (2002). Foundational investigations of the phenomenological origin of the spatiality of nature: The originary ark, the earth, does not move (F. Kersten Trans., L. Lawlor Rev.). In E. Husserl & M. Merleau-Ponty (Eds.), Husserl at the limits of phenomenology: Including texts by Edmund Husserl. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, P., & Delehanty, H. (2006). Sacred hoops: Spiritual lessons of a hardwood warrior (p. 2006). New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
  19. Jepsen, K. (2013). Real talk: Everything is made of fields. Symmetry: Dimensions of particle physics. Retrieved from http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/july-2013/real-talk-everything-is-made-of-fields
  20. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2006). Coming to our senses: Healing ourselves and the world through mindfulness. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
  21. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2011). Some reflections on the origins of MBSR, skillful means, and the trouble with maps. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 281–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kawakami, T. (2015). Luke Walton, Steve Kerr and the Warrior’s four core values: joy, mindfulness, compassion and competition. San Jose Mercury News. November 24, 2015.Google Scholar
  23. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. McMahan, D. L. (2008). The making of Buddhist modernism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945)Google Scholar
  26. Musser, G. (2015). Spooky action at a distance: The phenomenon that reimagines space and time—and what it means for black holes, the big bang, and theories of everything. New York: Scientific American/Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
  27. Puhakka, K. (2015). Encountering the psychological research paradigm: How buddhist practice has fared in the most recent phase of its Western migration. In E. Y. Shonin, W. Van Gordon, & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Buddhist foundations of mindfulness. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Rhys Davids, T. W. (1963). The Questions of king Milinda. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Rosch, E. (2015). The emperor’s clothes: A look behind the Western mindfulness mystique. In B. D. Ostafin, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.), Handbook of mindfulness and self-regulation (pp. 271–292). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sartre, J. P. (1958). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). London: Methuen. (Original work published 1943)Google Scholar
  31. Sharf, R. (1998). Experience. In M. C. Taylor (Ed.), Critical terms in religious studies (pp. 94–116). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sharf, R. (2014). Mindfulness and mindlessness in early Chan. Philosophy East & West, 64, 933–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Strauss, E. S. (2015) Big three dominates: No streak, but Warriors still at the peak. www.espn.go.com/blog/golden-state-warriors/post/_/id. Retrieved February 13, 2016.
  34. Tulku, Tarthang. (1977). Time, space, and knowledge: A new vision of reality. Emeryville: Dharma Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Tulku, Tarthang. (1987). Love of knowledge. Berkeley: Dharma Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Tarthang Tulku. (2015). Space field. In J. Petranker (Ed.), Inside knowledge: How to activate the radical new vision of reality presented to the world by Tibetan lama Tarthang Tulku. Berkeley: Dharma Publishing. [Originally published 1990]Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, C. (1992). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Taylor, C. (2007). The secular age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche. (1999). As it is. Kathmandu: Rangjung Yeshe Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Wilson, J. (2014). Mindful America: The mutual transformation of Buddhist meditation and American culture. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mangalam Research Center for Buddhist LanguagesCenter for Creative InquiryBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations