Advertisement

Usability in Digital Humanities - Evaluating User Interfaces, Infrastructural Components and the Use of Mobile Devices During Research Process

  • Natasa Bulatovic
  • Timo Gnadt
  • Matteo Romanello
  • Juliane Stiller
  • Klaus Thoden
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9819)

Abstract

The usability of tools and services that form a digital research infrastructure is a key asset for their acceptance among researchers. When applied to infrastructures, the concept of usability needs to be extended to other aspects such as the interoperability between several infrastructure components. In this paper, we present the results of several usability studies. Our aim was not only to test the usability of single tools but also to assess the extent to which different tools and devices can be seamlessly integrated into a single digital research workflow. Our findings suggest that more resources need be spent on testing of digital tools and infrastructure components and that it is especially important to conduct user tests covering the whole knowledge process.

Keywords

Usability Evaluation Digital humanities Digital tools Research process Research infrastructures 

References

  1. 1.
    Boukhelifa, N., Giannisakis, E., Dimara, E., Willett, W., Fekete, J.-D.: Supporting historical research through user-centered visual analytics. In: Bertini, E., Roberts, J.C. (eds.) EuroVis Workshop on Visual Analytics (EuroVA), pp. 1–5 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burghardt, M.: Annotationsergonomie: Design-Empfehlungen für linguistische Annotationswerkzeuge. Inf. Wiss. Prax. 63(5) (2012). doi: 10.1515/iwp-2012-0067
  3. 3.
    Funk, S.E., Schmunk, S.: DARIAH-DE Repositorium – Prototyp. (M 4.3.2.1). DARIAH-DE. Report (2015). https://wiki.de.dariah.eu/download/attachments/14651583/M4.3.2.1-DARIAH-Repositorium-Prototyp-final.pdf
  4. 4.
    Gibbs, F., Owens, T.: Building better digital humanities tools: toward broader audiences and user-centered designs. Digit. Humanit. Q. 6(2) (2012). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/6/2/000136/000136.html
  5. 5.
    Gnadt, T., Stiller, J., Thoden, K., Schmitt, V.: Finale Version Erfolgskriterien. (R 1.3.3). DARIAH-DE. Report (2015). https://wiki.de.dariah.eu/download/attachments/14651583/R133_Erfolgskriterien_Konsortium.pdf
  6. 6.
    Heuwing, B., Womser-Hacker, C.: Zwischen Beobachtung Und Partizipation – Nutzerzentrierte Methoden Für Eine Bedarfsanalyse in Der Digitalen Geschichtswissenschaft. Inf. Wiss. Prax. 66(5–6), 335–344 (2015). doi: 10.1515/iwp-2015-0058 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kirschenbaum, M.G.: ‘So the Colors Cover the Wires’: interface, aesthetics, and usability. In: Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., Unsworth, J. (eds.) A Companion to Digital Humanities, pp. 523–542. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lazar, J., Feng, J.H., Hochheiser, H.: Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, Chichester (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nielsen, J.: 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design (1995). http://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/. Accessed 15 Jan 2016
  10. 10.
    Romanello, M., Bulatovic, N., Gnadt, T., Schmitt, V.E., Stiller, J., Thoden, K.: Usability von DH-Tools und -Services (R 1.2.3). DARIAH-DE. Report (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sears, A.: Heuristic walkthroughs: finding the problems without the noise. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 9(3), 213–234 (1997). doi: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc0903_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C.: Designing the User Interface. Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 5th edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stiller, J., Thoden, K., Leganovic, O., Heise, C., Höckendorff, M., Gnadt, T.: Nutzungsverhalten in den Digital Humanities. (R 1.2.1/M 7.6) DARIAH-DE (2015). https://wiki.de.dariah.eu/download/attachments/14651583/Report1.2.1-final3.pdf
  14. 14.
    Stiller, J., Thoden, K., Zielke, D.: Usability in den Digital Humanities am Beispiel des LAUDATIO-Repositoriums. DHd 2016 Book of Abstracts - Vorträge. Leipzig (2016). http://www.dhd2016.de/abstracts/vorträge-058.html

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natasa Bulatovic
    • 1
  • Timo Gnadt
    • 2
  • Matteo Romanello
    • 3
  • Juliane Stiller
    • 4
  • Klaus Thoden
    • 5
  1. 1.Max Planck Digital LibraryMunichGermany
  2. 2.Göttingen State and University LibraryGöttingenGermany
  3. 3.Deutsches Archäologisches InstitutBerlinGermany
  4. 4.Berlin School of Library and Information ScienceHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  5. 5.Max Planck Institute for the History of ScienceBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations