BIB-R: A Benchmark for the Interpretation of Bibliographic Records

  • Joffrey Decourselle
  • Fabien Duchateau
  • Trond Aalberg
  • Naimdjon Takhirov
  • Nicolas Lumineau
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9819)

Abstract

In a global context which promotes the use of explicit semantics for sharing information and developing new services, the MAchine Readable Cataloguing (MARC) format that is commonly used by libraries worldwide has demonstrated its limitations. The semantic model for representing cultural items presented in the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) is expected to be a successor of MARC, and the complex transformation of MARC catalogs to FRBR catalogs (FRBRization) led to the proposition of various tools and approaches. However, these projects and the results they achieve are difficult to compare on a fair basis due to a lack of common datasets and appropriate metrics. Our contributions fill this gap by proposing the first public benchmark for the FRBRization process.

Keywords

Benchmark Migration Record interpretation FRBRization LRM FRBR MARC Dataset Evaluation metric 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by the French Agency ANRT (www.anrt.asso.fr), the company PROGILONE (www.progilone.com/), a PHC Aurora funding (#34047VH) and a CNRS PICS funding (#PICS06945).

References

  1. 1.
    Aalberg, T.: A process and tool for the conversion of MARC records to a normalized FRBR implementation. In: Sugimoto, S., Hunter, J., Rauber, A., Morishima, A. (eds.) ICADL 2006. LNCS, vol. 4312, pp. 283–292. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aalberg, T., Žumer, M.: The value of MARC data, or, challenges of FRBRisation. J. Documentation 69, 851–872 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alemu, G., Stevens, B., Ross, P., Chandler, J.: Linked data for libraries: benefits of a conceptual shift from library-specific record structures to RDF-based data models. New Libr. World 113, 549–570 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bowen, J.: Moving library metadata toward linked data: opportunities provided by the eXtensible catalog. In: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buchanan, G.: FRBR: enriching and integrating digital libraries. In: Proceedings of Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 260–269 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coyle, K.: FRBR, twenty years on. Cataloging Classif. Q. 53, 1–21 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Decourselle, J., Duchateau, F., Aalberg, T., Takhirov, N., Lumineau, N.: Appendix: BIB-R: a benchmark for the interpretation of bibliographic records. Technical report, LIRIS, NTNU (2016). http://liris.cnrs.fr/~fduchate/docs/appendix/appendix-tpdl16.pdf
  8. 8.
    Decourselle, J., Duchateau, F., Aalberg, T., Takhirov, N., Lumineau, N.: Open datasets for evaluating the interpretation of bibliographic records. In: Proceedings of Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Decourselle, J., Duchateau, F., Lumineau, N.: A survey of FRBRization techniques. In: Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, pp. 185–196 (2015). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01198487
  10. 10.
    Denton, W.: FRBR and the history of cataloging. In: Taylor, A.G. (ed.) Understanding FRBR: What it is and How it will Affect Our Retrieval Tools. Libraries Unlimited, Westport, Conn (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dickey, T.J.: FRBRization of a library catalog: better collocation of records, leading to enhanced search, retrieval, and display. Inf. Technol. Libr. 27, 23–32 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hickey, T.B., O’Neill, E.T.: FRBRizing OCLC’s WorldCat. Cataloging Classif. Q. 39, 239–251 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manguinhas, H.M.A., Freire, N.M.A., Borbinha, J.L.B.: FRBRization of MARC records in multiple catalogs. In: Hunter, J., Lagoze, C., Giles, C.L., Li, Y.F. (eds.) JCDL, pp. 225–234. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Notess, M., Dunn, J.W., Hardesty, J.L.: Scherzo: a FRBR-based music discovery system. In: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, pp. 182–183 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Riley, J.: Enhancing interoperability of FRBR-based metadata. In: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tilletts taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Libr. Resour. Tech. Serv. 48(2), 130–143 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Riva, P., Žumer, M.: Introducing the FRBR Library Reference Model. IFLA Conferences (2015). http://library.ifla.org/1084/
  18. 18.
    Takhirov, N., Aalberg, T., Duchateau, F., Žumer, M.: FRBR-ML: a FRBR-based framework for semantic interoperability. Seman. Web J. 3, 23–43 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang, Y., Salaba, A.: Implementing FRBR in Libraries: Key Issues and Future Directions. Neal-Schuman Publishers, New York (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joffrey Decourselle
    • 1
  • Fabien Duchateau
    • 1
  • Trond Aalberg
    • 2
  • Naimdjon Takhirov
    • 3
  • Nicolas Lumineau
    • 1
  1. 1.LIRIS, UMR5205, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1LyonFrance
  2. 2.NTNUTrondheimNorway
  3. 3.Westerdals - Oslo School of Arts, Communication and Technology - Faculty of TechnologyOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations