Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)


The Republic of Colombia is a middle income, highly urbanised country with very large, but declining, public transport share. During two decades, cities initiated a transformation process for public transport provision from a semi regulated, dispersed ownership model to formalized private services under stronger supervision by local governments. The process was sparked by the implementation of TransMilenio, the bus rapid transit (BRT) system in the city of Bogotá, and followed by several cities with the support of the national government. This support has been provided in the form of policy instruments, funding for infrastructure and technical advisory services. Results are mixed; while transformation is evident and brings positive socio-economic indicators, some financial issues prevail, and cities have not been able to curb down motorisation, especially the growth of motorcycles. This chapter provides an overview of background conditions; urban land use and spatial structures; trends in transport use and mobility, urban transport problems; public transport provision; and urban transport governance, decision-making, and financing. An assessment of the impacts of the national and local policies is presented as well as recommendations for strengthening urban public transport sustainability.


Public Transport Congestion Price Mass Transit Urban Transport Public Transport System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Acevedo J, Bocarejo JP, Echeverry JC, Lleras GC, Ospina G, Rodríguez A (2009) El Transporte Como Soporte Al Desarrollo de Colombia. Una Visión Al 2040. Universidad de Los Andes. Ediciones Uniandes, Bogotá, Colombia. doi:  10.16924/riua.v0i29.257
  2. Alesina A, Carrasquilla A, Echavarría JJ (2005) Decentralization in Colombia. In: Alesina A (ed) Institutional reforms: the case of Colombia, vol 53, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 175–208. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  3. Ardila A (2007) How public transportation’s past is haunting its future in Bogotá, Colombia. Transp Res Rec 2038:9–15. doi: 10.3141/2038-02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banco de Desarrollo de América Latina (CAF) (2011) Desarrollo Urbano Y Movilidad En América Latina.
  5. Bocarejo JP, Oviedo DR (2012) Transport accessibility and social inequities: a tool for identification of mobility needs and evaluation of transport investments. J Transp Geogr 24:142–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bocarejo JP, Tafur LE (2011) Urban land use transformation driven by an innovative transportation project, Bogotá, Colombia. Report for UN Habitat, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  7. Bocarejo JP, Portilla IJ, Velásquez JM, Cruz MN, Peña A, Oviedo DR (2014a) An innovative transit system and its impact on low income users: the case of the Metrocable in Medellín. J Transp Geogr 39:49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bocarejo J, Velásquez J, Galarza D (2014b) Challenges of implementing à la mode transport projects. Transp Res Rec 2451:131–138. doi: 10.3141/2451-15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BRTData (EMBARQ) (2016) BRT indicators. BRT Center of Excellence.
  10. Bustamante Pérez S (2014) La ‘metropolización’ En Colombia: Una Aproximación Crítica a Su Institucionalidad. Rev Ciudades 1(1):10–20Google Scholar
  11. Cáceres L, Díaz L, Rodríguez L (2013) El Proceso de Urbanización En Colombia: Tendencias Globales, Similitudes Regionales Y Procesos Locales. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
  12. Carrigan A, King R, Velasquez JM, Raifman M, Duduta N (2013) Social, environmental and economic impacts of BRT systems: bus rapid transit case studies from around the world. EMBARQ, World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Coupé F, Cardona JG (2013) Impact of the metrocables on the local economy. In: Dávila JD (ed) Urban mobility & poverty—lessons from Medellín and Soacha, Colombia. Development Planning Unit, University College London, London, UK, pp 89–103.
  14. Coupé F, Brand P, Dávila JD (2013) Medellín: institutional context and urban paradigm change. In: Dávila JD (ed) Urban mobility & poverty—lessons from Medellín and Soacha, Colombia, Development Planning Unit, University College London, London, UK, pp 55–67.
  15. DANE (2015) Pobreza Monetaria En Colombia. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística, Bogotá, Colombia, Google Scholar
  16. Demographia (2015) Demographia world urban areas (built-up urban areas or urban agglomerations). Demographia.
  17. Díaz R, Bongardt D (2013) Financing sustainable urban transport. EMBARQ/GIZ, Bonn, Germany.
  18. DNP (2014) DNP Advierte Que Se Avecina Colapso de Movilidad En Las Principales Capitales. Departamento Nacional de Planeación, Bogotá, Colombia. advierte que se avecina colapso de movilidad en las principales capitales.aspx
  19. DNP (2015a) Cuál Es El Estado Actual de La Política Del Sector Del Transporte Urbano? Departamento Nacional de Planeación, Bogotá, Colombia.ál-es-el-estado-actual-de-la-política-del-sector-del-transporte-urbano.pdf
  20. DNP (2015b) Plan Nacional de Desarrollo. Departamento Nacional de Planeación, Bogotá, Colombia.
  21. Econometria (2015) Caracterización de La Prestación Del Servicio de Transporte En Motocicleta (Mototaxismo). Corporación Fondo de Prevención Vial, Bogotá, ColombiaGoogle Scholar
  22. Flores R, Alberto R, Taddia AP, Pardo CF, Lleras N (2015) Ciclo-Inclusión En América Latina Y El Caribe: Guía Para Impulsar El Uso de La Bicicleta. Washington, DC.
  23. Garcia-Moreno JA (2005) Estimating TransMilenio’s impact on crime on the Avenida Caracas and its neighbouring areas. Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia, Google Scholar
  24. Gilbert A (2008) Bus rapid transit: is TransMilenio a miracle cure? Transp Rev 28(4):439–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hidalgo D, Díaz R (2014) Advancing urban mobility with national programs. Transp Res Rec 2451:113–120. doi: 10.3141/2451-13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hidalgo D, King R (2014) Public transport integration in Bogoá and Cali, Colombia—facing transition from semi-deregulated services to full regulation citywide. Res Transp Econ 48:166–175. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hidalgo D, Pereira L, Estupiñán N, Jiménez PL (2013) TransMilenio BRT system in Bogotá, high performance and positive impact—main results of an ex-post evaluation. Res Transp Econ 39(1):133–138. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. INMLCF (2015) Forensis 2014 Datos Para La Vida. Forensis, vol 16, INMLCF, Bogotá, Colombia.
  29. Ipsos (2014) Encuesta de Percepción de Ciudades Red de Ciudades Cómo Vamos 2014. Bogotá, Colombia.
  30. Oviedo D, Titheridge H (2015) Mobilities of the periphery: informality, access and social exclusion in the urban fringe in Colombia. J Transp Geogr. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.12.004 Google Scholar
  31. Parra-Peña RI, Ordóñez L, Acosta C (2013) Políticas Que Cierran Brechas Entre Lo Urbano Y Lo Rural En Colombia. Centro, Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) Políticas En Síntesis.
  32. Rodríguez C, Peralta T, Gallego JM (2016) Examining the implementation and labor outcomes of targeted transit subsidies: SISBEN subsidy in Bogotá, Colombia. In: Transportation Research Board annual meeting. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  33. Scholl L, Bouillon C, Bocarejo JP, Oviedo D (2015) Poverty analysis: evaluation of the effects of bus rapid transit (BRT) systems on accessibility and mobility for the poor in Cali and Lima. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, Google Scholar
  34. Verma P, López Valderrama JS, Pardo CF (2015) Bicycle account Bogotá 2014. Bogotá, ColombiaGoogle Scholar
  35. World Bank (2015) Mootor vehicles data.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.World Resources InstituteBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations