Evaluation of Nutrition-sensitive Programs
The current global evidence base regarding the nutritional impacts of nutrition-sensitive programs, including popular ones such as social safety nets and agriculture development programs, is generally limited because of poor targeting, design and implementation of programs, and equally important, sub-optimal evaluation designs. Although there is a consensus regarding the need to invest in nutrition-sensitive programs in order to address the underlying causes of undernutrition and to improve the effectiveness, reach, and scale of both nutrition-specific interventions and nutrition-sensitive programs, the evidence of what works, how and at what cost is extremely limited. Thus, building a strong body of evidence from rigorous, theory-based comprehensive evaluations of different nutrition-sensitive program models that bring together interventions from a variety of sectors (e.g., health, education, agriculture, social protection, women’s empowerment, water, and sanitation) is essential to provide the needed guidance for future investments for improving nutrition. This chapter provides this type of guidance, focusing on how to design and carry out rigorous process, cost, and impact evaluations of complex nutrition-sensitive programs; and it aims to demystify some of the perceived insurmountable challenges that have prevented investments in rigorous evaluations of such programs in the past. By doing so, we hope that the evidence gap in nutrition-sensitive programming, which has characterized the past decades of development, will quickly be filled and that future investments will benefit from a strong body of evidence on what works to improve nutrition, how it works, and at what cost.
KeywordsNutrition sensitive Evidence of impact Program evaluation Plausibility Probability
- 1.Ruel MT, Alderman H. Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help to accelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition? Lancet. 2013;382. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60843-0.
- 8.Habicht JP, Gretel P, Lapp J. Methodologies to evaluate the impact of large-scale nutrition programs. Washington DC. 2009.Google Scholar
- 9.Habicht JP, Victora CG, Vaughan JP. Evaluation designs for adequacy, plausibility and probability of public health programme performance and impact. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28(1):10–8. USA: Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University.Google Scholar
- 10.Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE. Evaluation: a systematic approach, vol. 7th. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2004.Google Scholar
- 11.Olney DK, Vicheka S, Kro M, Chakriya C, Kroeun H, Sok L, Talukder A, Quinn V, Iannotti L, Becker E. Using program impact pathways to understand and improve program delivery, utilization, and potential for impact of Helen Keller International’s Homestead Food Production Program in Cambodia. Food Nutr Bull. 2013;34(2):169–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Gertler PJ, Martinez M, Premand P, Rawlings LB, Vermeersch CMJ. Impact evaluation in practice. World Bank Publications. 2010.Google Scholar
- 14.Khandker SR, Koolwal GB, Samad HA. Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. Washington DC: World Bank Publications; 2010.Google Scholar
- 16.Baker JL. Evaluating the impact of development projects on poverty: a handbook for practitioners. World Bank Publications. 2000.Google Scholar
- 19.Gibson RS. Principles of nutritional assessment. Oxford University Press. 2005.Google Scholar
- 20.Coates J, Swindale A, Bilinsky P. Household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) for measurement of food access: indicator guide (v.3). Washington D.C.: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project (FANTA)/Academy for Educational Development; 2007.Google Scholar
- 21.FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), and IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement). Defining a standard operational indicator of women’s dietary diversity: the women’s dietary diversity follow-up project. Contributors: Martin-Prével Y, Allemand P, Wiesmann D, Arimond M, Ballard TJ, Deitchler M, Dop MC, Kennedy G, Lee WTK. Rome; Montpellier. 2014.Google Scholar
- 23.WHO. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices part 2: measurement. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.Google Scholar
- 24.Olney DK, Dillon A, Pedehombga A, Ouédraogo M, Ruel MT. Using an agricultural platform in burkina faso to improve nutrition during the first 1,000 days. In: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), editors. Global nutrition report 2014: actions and accountability to accelerate the world’s progress on nutrition. Washington D.C: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2014. doi: 10.2499/9780896295643.
- 25.Nguyen PH, Menon P, Keithly SC, Kim SS, Hajeebhoy N, Tran LM, Ruel MT, Rawat R. Program impact pathway analysis of a social franchise model shows potential to improve infant and young child feeding practices in Vietnam. J Nutr. 2014;144(10):1627–36. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.194464.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar