Advertisement

Exploring TV White Spaces for Use in Campus Networks

  • Hope MauwaEmail author
  • Antoine Bagula
  • Marco Zennaro
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 171)

Abstract

University campuses are busy places for wireless client traffic coming from Wi-Fi connections and other wireless devices that contend for the 2.4 GHz frequencies space that most campus Wi-Fi networks use currently. This is making the 2.4 GHz frequency unsuitable for Wi-Fi connection due to too much interference from other devices as well as from Wi-Fi connections themselves. TV white space could provide a suitable alternative to campus Wi-Fi networks because of its better signal propagation characteristics as compared to 5 GHz frequencies, which is currently being used as an alternative. As a first step towards white space management to prepare Africa’s university campuses networks for the migration from analog to digital TV, this paper presents the results of an investigation that was conducted to look at the spatial distribution of white spaces frequencies around two university campuses in Cape Town-South Africa to assess if they are useful enough to be used for university campuses to complement Wi-Fi networks.

Keywords

Campus Wi-Fi White-Fi Loose spectrum identification Coarse spectrum identification 

References

  1. 1.
    Reiter, R.: Wireless connectivity for the Internet of Things, one size does not fit all. Tex. Instrum. (2014). http://www.ti.com.cn/cn/lit/wp/swry010/swry010.pdf
  2. 2.
    Brown, T.X., Pietrosemoli, E., Zennaro, M., Bagula, A., Mauwa, H., Nleya, S.M.: A survey of TV white space measurements. In: Nungu, A., Pehrson, B., Sansa-Otim, J. (eds.) AFRICOMM 2014. LNICSSITE, vol. 147, pp. 164–172. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16886-9_17 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Makris, D., Gardikis, G., Kourtis, A.: Quantifying TV white space capacity: a geolocation-based approach. IEEE Commun. Mag. 50(9), 145 (2012). IEEECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cox, J.: Wi-Fi devices crowd 2.4 GHz band; IT looks to 5 GHz. NETWORKWORLD (2011). http://www.networkworld.com/article/2182420/wireless/wi-fi-devices-crowd-2-4ghz-band--it-looks-to-5ghz.html
  5. 5.
    De Vries, G., De Vries, P.: The role of licence-exemption in spectrum reform. University of Washington (2007). http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6847/
  6. 6.
    FCC: Third memorandum opinion and order, In the Matter of: Unlicensed Operation in the TV Broadcast Bands, ET Docket No. 12–36, United States, 05 April 2012Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ofcom: Digital dividend: cognitive access - statement on licence-exempting cognitive devices using interleaved spectrum, United Kingdom (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pinofolo, J., Rimer, S., Paul, B., Mikeka, C., Mlatho, J.: TV white spaces technical rules for Africa to enable efficient spectrum management. In: Proceedings and Report of the 7th UbuntuNet Alliance Annual Conference, pp. 355–364 (2014). http://www.ubuntunet.net/sites/default/files/uc2014/proceedings/pinifoloj2.pdf
  9. 9.
    Independent Communications Authority of South Africa: Draft Terrestrial Broadcasting Frequency Plan 2013. ICASA (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    RF Explorer: Handheld Spectrum Analyser. RF Explorer Combo Devices Specification Chart. Nuts About Nets. http://rfexplorer.com/combo-specs/
  11. 11.
    Iwamura, M., Etemad, K., Fong, M., Nory, R., Love, R.: Carrier aggregation framework in 3GPP LTE-advanced [WiMAX/LTE Update]. IEEE Commun. Mag. 48(8), 60–67 (2010). IEEECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pedersen, K.I., Frederiksen, F., Rosa, C., Nguyen, H., Garcia, L.G.U., Wang, Y.: Carrier aggregation for LTE-advanced: functionality and performance aspects. IEEE Commun. Mag. 49(6), 89–95 (2011). IEEECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yuan, G., Zhang, X., Wang, W., Yang, Y.: Carrier aggregation for LTE-advanced mobile communication systems. IEEE Commun. Mag. 48(2), 88–93 (2010). IEEECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martijn, E.F.T., Herben, M.: Characterization of radio wave propagation into buildings at 1800 MHz. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2(1), 122–125 (2003). IEEECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elgannas, H., Kostanic, I.: Outdoor-to-indoor propagation characteristics of 850 MHz and 1900 MHz bands in macro cellular environments. In: World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science (WCECS-14). ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coudé, R.: Radio Mobile - RF propagation simulation software (1988). http://radiomobile.pe1mew.nl/
  17. 17.
    Yin, L., Wu, K., Yin, S., Li, J., Li, S., Ni, L.M.: Digital dividend capacity in China: a developing country’s case study. In: 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DYSPAN), pp. 121–130. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, T., Leng, N., Banerjee, S.: A vehicle-based measurement framework for enhancing whitespace spectrum databases. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 17–28. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Naik, G., Singhal, S., Kumar, A., Karandikar, A.: Quantitative assessment of TV white space in India. In: 2014 Twentieth National Conference on Communications (NCC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mishra, S.M., Sahai, A.: How much white space has the FCC opened up? In: IEEE Communication Letters. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hessar, F., Roy, S.: Capacity considerations for secondary networks in TV white space. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 1(1), 1780–1793 (2014). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harrison, K., Mishra, S.M., Saha, S.: How much white-space capacity is there? In: 2010 IEEE Symposium New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum, pp. 1–10. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bagula, A.B.: Modelling and implementation of QoS in wireless sensor networks: a multi-constrained traffic engineering model. EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Networking, 1 (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bagula, A.B.: Hybrid traffic engineering: the least path interference algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries, pp. 89–96. South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bagula, A.B.: Hybrid routing in next generation IP networks. Comput. Commun. 29(7), 879–892 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bagula, A.B.: On achieveing bandwidth-aware LSP//spl lambda/SP multiplexing/separation in multi-layer networks. J. Sel. Areas Commun. 25(5), 987–1000 (2007). IEEECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zennaro, M., Bagula, A., Gascon, D., Noveleta, A.B.: Long distance wireless sensor networks: simulation vs reality. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Networked Systems for Developing Regions. ACM (2012). no. 12Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bagula, A., Zennaro, M., Inggs, G., Scott, S., Gascon, D.: Ubiquitous sensor networking for development (USN4D): an application to pollution monitoring. Sensors 12(1), 391–414 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zennaro, M., Bagula, A.B.: Design of a flexible and robust gateway to collect sensor data in intermittent power environments. Int. J. Sens. Networks 8(3–4), 172–181 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISAT Lab, Department of CSUniversity of the Western CapeBellvilleSouth Africa
  2. 2.ICT4D Lab, International Centre for Theoretical PhysicsTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations