Predicting Core Columns of Protein Multiple Sequence Alignments for Improved Parameter Advising
In a computed protein multiple sequence alignment, the coreness of a column is the fraction of its substitutions that are in so-called core columns of the gold-standard reference alignment of its proteins. In benchmark suites of protein reference alignments, the core columns of the reference are those that can be confidently labeled as correct, usually due to all residues in the column being sufficiently close in the spatial superposition of the folded three-dimensional structures of the proteins. When computing a protein multiple sequence alignment in practice, a reference alignment is not known, so its coreness can only be predicted.
We develop for the first time a predictor of column coreness for protein multiple sequence alignments. This allows us to predict which columns of a computed alignment are core, and hence better estimate the alignment’s accuracy. Our approach to predicting coreness is similar to nearest-neighbor classification from machine learning, except we transform nearest-neighbor distances into a coreness prediction via a regression function, and we learn an appropriate distance function through a new optimization formulation that solves a large-scale linear programming problem. We apply our coreness predictor to parameter advising, the task of choosing parameter values for an aligner’s scoring function to obtain a more accurate alignment of a specific set of sequences. We show that for this task, our predictor strongly outperforms other column-confidence estimators from the literature, and affords a substantial boost in alignment accuracy.
- 5.DeBlasio, D., Kececioglu, J.: Ensemble multiple sequence alignment via advising. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (BCB), pp. 452–461 (2015)Google Scholar
- 6.DeBlasio, D.F., Kececioglu, J.D.: Learning parameter sets for alignment advising. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (BCB), pp. 230–239 (2014)Google Scholar
- 8.Dress, A.W., Flamm, C., Fritzsch, G., Grünewald, S., Kruspe, M., Prohaska, S.J., Stadler, P.F.: Noisy: identification of problematic columns in multiple sequence alignments. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 3(7) (2008)Google Scholar
- 10.Edgar, R.C.: BENCH, January 2009. drive5.com/bench
- 11.Edgar, R.C.: MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinform. 5(113), 1–19 (2004)Google Scholar
- 13.Jones, E., Oliphant, T., Peterson, P., et al.: SciPy: open source scientific tools for Python (2001). http://www.scipy.org
- 16.Kück, P., Meusemann, K., Dambach, J., et al.: Parametric and non-parametric masking of randomness in sequence alignments can be improved and leads to better resolved trees. Front. Zool. 7(10), 1–10 (2010)Google Scholar
- 20.Wheeler, T.J., Kececioglu, J.D.: Opal: software for sum-of-pairs multiple sequence alignment, January 2012. http://opal.cs.arizona.edu