Advertisement

Construction Kits for Biological Evolution

  • Aaron Sloman
Chapter
Part of the Theory and Applications of Computability book series (THEOAPPLCOM)

Abstract

This is part of the Turing-inspired Meta-Morphogenesis project, which aims to identify transitions in information-processing since the earliest proto-organisms, in order to provide new understanding of varieties of biological intelligence, including the mathematical intelligence that produced Euclid’s Elements. (Explaining evolution of mathematicians is much harder than explaining evolution of consciousness!) Transitions depend on “construction kits”, including the initial “Fundamental Construction Kit” (FCK) based on physics and Derived Construction Kits (DCKs) produced by evolution, development, learning and culture. Some construction kits (e.g. Lego, Meccano, plasticine, sand) are concrete using physical components and relationships. Others (e.g. grammars, proof systems and programming languages) are abstract, producing abstract entities, e.g. sentences, proofs, and new abstract construction kits. Mixtures of the two are hybrid kits. Some are meta-construction kits able to create, modify or combine construction kits. Construction kits are generative: they explain sets of possible construction processes, and possible products, with mathematical properties and limitations that are mathematical consequences of properties of the kit and its environment. Evolution and development both make new construction kits possible. Study of the FCK and DCKs can lead us to new answers to old questions, e.g. about the nature of mathematics, language, mind, science, and life, exposing deep connections between science and metaphysics. Showing how the FCK makes its derivatives, including all the processes and products of natural selection, possible is a challenge for science and philosophy. This is a long-term research programme with a good chance of being progressive in the sense of Lakatos. Later, this may explain how to overcome serious current limitations of AI (artificial intelligence), robotics, neuroscience and psychology.

Keywords

Virtual Machine Turing Machine Mathematical Discovery Asteroid Impact Lego Brick 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

My work on the Meta-Morphogenesis project, including this paper, owes a great dept to Barry Cooper, who unfortunately died in October 2015. I had never met him until we both contributed chapters to a book published in 2011 on Information and Computation. Barry and I first met, by email, when we reviewed each others’ chapters. Later, out of the blue, he invited me to contribute to the Turing centenary volume he was co-editing [11]. I contributed three papers. He then asked me for a contribution to Part 4 (on Emergence and Morphogenesis) based on Turing’s paper on morphogenesis published in 1952, 2 years before he died. That got me wondering what Turing might have done if he had lived another 30–40 years. So I offered Barry a paper proposing “The Meta-Morphogenesis Project” as an answer. He accepted it (as the final commentary paper in the book), and ever since then I have been working full-time on the project. He later encouraged me further by inviting me to give talks and to contribute a chapter to this book. As a result we had several very enjoyable conversations. He changed my life by giving me a new research direction, which does not often happen to 75-year old retired academics! (Now 5 years older.) I wish we could continue our conversations. I also owe much to the highly intelligent squirrels and magpies in our garden, who have humbled me. Finally, my sincere thanks to Ronan Nugent (Senior Editor, Springer Computer Science) who took on the enormous workload required for dealing with the final corrections.

References

  1. 1.
    P.W. Anderson, More is different. Sci. New Ser. 177 (4047), 393–396 (1972)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.R. Ashby, Design for a Brain (Chapman and Hall, London, 1952)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.R. Ashby, An Introduction to Cybernetics (Chapman and Hall, London, 1956)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L.P. Beaudoin, Goal processing in autonomous agents. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, 1994Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L.P. Beaudoin, A. Sloman, A study of motive processing and attention, in Prospects for Artificial Intelligence, ed. by A. Sloman, D. Hogg, G. Humphreys, D. Partridge, A. Ramsay (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1993), pp. 229–238Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Bell, Selection The Mechanism of Evolution, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Bennett, Construction zone: no hard hat required. Philos. Stud. 154, 79–104 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.M. Chappell, A. Sloman, Natural and artificial meta-configured altricial information-processing systems. Int. J. Unconv. Comput. 3 (3), 211–239 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Chomsky, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1965)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Coates, Umm-E-Aiman, B. Charrier, Understanding “green” multicellularity: do seaweeds hold the key? Front. Plant Sci. (2014). doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00737Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.B. Cooper, J. van Leeuwen (eds.) Alan Turing: His Work and Impact (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2013)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.W. Deacon, Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter (W. W. Norton and Company, New York, 2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Esfeld, D. Lazarovici, V. Lam, M. Hubert, The physics and metaphysics of primitive stuff. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 67 (4), 1–29 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Fernando, Review of “The Principles of Life” by Tibor Ganti. (2003, Oxford University Press.). Artif. Life 14 (4), 467–470 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Ganti, in The Principles of Life, ed. by E. Szathmáry, J. Griesemer. (Oxford University Press, New York, 2003). Translation of the 1971 Hungarian editionGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.J. Gibson, The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1966)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.J. Gibson, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1979)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (Macmillan, London, 1781). Translated (1929) by Norman Kemp SmithGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Karmiloff-Smith, Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Kauffman, At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Complexity (Penguin Books, London, 1995)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E.F. Keller, Organisms, machines, and thunderstorms: a history of self-organization, part one. Hist. Stud. Nat. Sci. 38 (1 (Winter)), 45–75 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    E.F. Keller, Organisms, machines, and thunderstorms: a history of self-organization, part two. Complexity, emergence, and stable attractors. Hist. Stud. Nat. Sci. 39 (1 (Winter)), 1–31 (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    G. Korthof, Review of The Principles of Life by Tibor Ganti (2003). Updated 6 Oct 2014Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J.E. Laird, A. Newell, P.S. Rosenbloom, SOAR: an architecture for general intelligence. Artif. Intell. 33, 1–64 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    I. Lakatos, Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes, in Philosophical Papers, Vol I, ed. by J. Worrall, G. Currie (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980), pages 8–101Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R.D. Luce, H. Raiffa, Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey (Wiley, New York; Chapman and Hall, London, 1957)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    C. Mathis, T. Bhattacharya, S.I. Walker, The emergence of life as a first order phase transition. Tech. rep., Arizona State University (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. McCarthy, Ascribing mental qualities to machines, in Philosophical Perspectives in Artificial Intelligence, ed. by M. Ringle (Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, 1979), pp. 161–195, http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/ascribing/ascribing.html Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. McCarthy, P.J. Hayes, Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of AI, in Machine Intelligence 4, ed. by B. Meltzer, D. Michie (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 1969), pp. 463–502, http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/mcchay69/mcchay69.html Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    M.L. Minsky, The Society of Mind (William Heinemann, London, 1987)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    M.L. Minsky, The Emotion Machine (Pantheon, New York, 2006)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    R. Penrose, Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    K.R. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Routledge, London, 1934)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    K.R. Popper, Unended Quest (Fontana/Collins, Glasgow, 1976)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    K.R. Popper, Natural Selection and the Emergence of Mind. Dialectica 32 (3–4), 339–355 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    W.T. Powers, Behavior, the Control of Perception (Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 1973)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    E. Schrödinger, What Is Life? (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1944)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. Senghas, Language emergence: clues from a new Bedouin sign language. Curr. Biol. 15 (12), R463–R465 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    C. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423, 623–656 (1948)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    H.A. Simon, Motivational and emotional controls of cognition, in Reprinted in Models of Thought, ed. by H.A. Simon (Yale University Press, Newhaven, 1967), pp. 29–38Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    A. Sloman, Knowing and understanding: relations between meaning and truth, meaning and necessary truth, meaning and synthetic necessary truth (DPhil Thesis). PhD thesis, Oxford University, 1962. http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/07.html#706
  42. 42.
    A. Sloman, How to derive “better” from “is”. Am. Philos. Q. 6, 43–52 (1969)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    A. Sloman, “Ought” and “better”. Mind LXXIX (315), 385–394 (1970)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    A. Sloman, Tarski, Frege and the liar paradox. Philosophy 46 (176), 133–147 (1971). http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/62-80.html#1971-03
  45. 45.
    A. Sloman, The Computer Revolution in Philosophy (Harvester Press/Humanities Press, Hassocks, Sussex/New Jersey, 1978). http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/cogaff/62-80.html#crp,2015
  46. 46.
    A. Sloman, Image interpretation: the way ahead?, in Physical and Biological Processing of Images (Proceedings of an International Symposium Organised by The Rank Prize Funds, London, 1982.), ed. by O.J. Braddick, A.C. Sleigh (Springer, Berlin, 1983), pp. 380–401Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    A. Sloman, The mind as a control system, in Philosophy and the Cognitive Sciences, ed. by C. Hookway, D. Peterson (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993), pp. 69–110Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    A. Sloman, Actual possibilities, in Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference (KR ’96), ed. by L.C. Aiello, S.C. Shapiro (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Boston, 1996), pp. 627–638Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    A. Sloman, The SimAgent TOOLKIT – for Philosophers and Engineers (And Some Biologists, Psychologists and Social Scientists) (1996), http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/poplog/packages/simagent.html Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    A. Sloman, The cognition and affect project: architectures, architecture-schemas, and the new science of mind. Tech. rep., School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham (2003), Revised August 2008Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    A. Sloman, Requirements for a fully deliberative architecture (Or component of an architecture). Research Note COSY-DP-0604, School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham (2006)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    A. Sloman, Evolution of minds and languages. What evolved first and develops first in children: languages for communicating, or languages for thinking (Generalised Languages: GLs)? (2008)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    A. Sloman, Architecture-based motivation vs reward-based motivation. Newsl. Philos. Comput. 09 (1), 10–13 (2009)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    A. Sloman, How virtual machinery can bridge the “explanatory gap”, in natural and artificial systems, in Proceedings SAB 2010, LNAI 6226, ed. by S. Doncieux et al. (Springer, Heidelberg, 2010), pp. 13–24Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    A. Sloman, What’s information, for an organism or intelligent machine? How can a machine or organism mean?, in Information and Computation, ed. by G. Dodig-Crnkovic, M. Burgin (World Scientific, New Jersey, 2011), pp. 393–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    A. Sloman, Virtual machine functionalism (the only form of functionalism worth taking seriously in philosophy of mind and theories of consciousness). Research note, School of Computer Science, The University of Birmingham (2013)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    A. Sloman, Virtual machinery and evolution of mind (part 3) meta-morphogenesis: evolution of information-processing machinery, in Alan Turing - His Work and Impact, ed. by S.B. Cooper, J. van Leeuwen (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2013), pp. 849–856Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    A. Sloman, R.L. Chrisley, Virtual machines and consciousness. J. Conscious. Stud. 10 (4–5), 113–172 (2003)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    R. Sun, The CLARION cognitive architecture: extending cognitive modeling to social simulation, in Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction, ed. by R. Sun (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006), pp. 79–99. http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/~rsun/sun.clarion2005.pdf
  60. 60.
    D.W. Thompson, On Growth and Form (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1917). Revised Edition 1948Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    A. Trehub, The Cognitive Brain (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1991)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    A.M. Turing, On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 42 (2), 230–265 (1936)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    A.M. Turing, Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59, 433–460 (1950); Reprinted in E.A. Feigenbaum, J. Feldman (eds.) Computers and Thought (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963), pp. 11–35Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    A.M. Turing, The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 237, 37–72 (1952)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    C.H. Waddington, The Strategy of the Genes (Macmillan, New York, 1957)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    A. Wagner, Arrival of the Fittest: Solving Evolution’s Greatest Puzzle (Oneworld Publications, London, 2014)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    A.A.S. Weir, J. Chappell, A. Kacelnik, Shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows. Science 297, 981 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    N. Wiener, Cybernetics: or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, 2nd edn. (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1961)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    A. Wilson, Metaphysical causation. Tech. rep., University of Birmingham, Department of Philosophy (2015). Video lecture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2l1wKrtlxs
  70. 70.
    I.P. Wright, Emotional agents. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, The University of Birmingham, 1997Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    I.P. Wright, A. Sloman, L.P. Beaudoin, Towards a design-based analysis of emotional episodes. Philos. Psychiatry Psychol. 3 (2), 101–126 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aaron Sloman
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations