Advertisement

Corporate Social Responsibility and Farm Animal Welfare: Towards Sustainable Development in the Food Industry?

  • John LeverEmail author
  • Adrian Evans
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

In recent years, CSR has grown in importance as supermarkets and corporate retailers have responded to consumer concerns over the growing prominence of a range of issues linked to environmental sustainability and farm animal welfare (FAW). Improvements in FAW can be aligned closely with the three pillars of sustainable development—social, economic and environmental sustainability. Animal agriculture has a significant impact on climate change and is in direct competition with humans for water, food, space and other scarce resources. Factory farming also spreads pathogens, with the potential to increase infectious diseases, and also significantly underlines livelihoods in rural communities. Corporate retailers are now seen to be socially and ethically accountable to both their immediate stakeholders and wider society, and it is this situation that has brought about the increased use of CSR as a means of promoting their efforts in this area.

As well as making significant improvements on the social and environmental issues, there is great potential for better FAW to improve business performance by increasing efficiencies of production, sustainable procurement and consumption practices, whilst enhancing food safety. In is in this context that the Business Benchmark for Farm Animal Welfare (BBFAW) has emerged to examine how companies work to improve FAW. The benchmark evaluates the performance of supermarkets and corporate retailers in this area by examining a range of CSR related publicity materials. This chapter draws on research from a number of recent EU projects on FAW to assess how, if and in what ways the BBFAW helps supermarkets and corporate retailers to further sustainable development through CSR.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Supply Chain Sustainable Development Animal Welfare Corporate Social Responsibility Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akhtar, A. (2012). Animals and public health: Why treating animals better is critical to human welfare. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amos, N., & Sullivan, R. (2011). Farm animal welfare as an investment issue. Investor Briefing 4, BBFAW.Google Scholar
  3. Amos, N., & Sullivan, R. (2012). Farm animal welfare as an investment issue, investor briefing No. 4. UK: Business Benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare.Google Scholar
  4. Amos, N., & Sullivan, R. (2013). The business benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare 2012 report. Google Scholar
  5. Amos, N., & Sullivan, R. (2014). The business benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare 2013 report. Google Scholar
  6. Amos, N., & Sullivan, R. (2015). The business benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare 2014 report. Google Scholar
  7. Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinnes, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2003). What will consumers pay for social product features? Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beal, B. D. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Definition, core issues, and recent developments. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett, R. (1995). The value of farm animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 46, 46–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennett, R. (1996). People’s willingness to pay for farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 5, 3–11.Google Scholar
  11. Blokhuis, H. J., Miele, M., Veissier, I., & Jones, B. (Eds.). (2013). Improving farm animal welfare: Science and society working together: The Welfare Quality approach. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Bonnett, M. (2002). Education for sustainability as a frame of mind. Environmental Education Research, 8(1), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brambell, R. (1965, December). Technical committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems (the Brambell report). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, L. (2001). Eradicating hunger: A growing challenge; State of the World 2001 (pp. 43–62). Washington, DC: The WorldWatch Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Buller, H. (2010). The marketing and communication of animal welfare: A review of existing tools, strategies and practice. The European Animal Welfare Platform (EAWP).Google Scholar
  16. Buller, H., & Roe, E. J. (2012). Commodifying animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 21(supplement 1), 131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Busch, L., Thiagarajan, D., Hatanaka, M., Bain, C., Flores, L. G., & Frahm, M. (2005). The relationship of third-party certification (TPC) to sanitary/phytosanitary (SPS) measures and the international agri-food trade (Final report).Google Scholar
  18. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business Society, 38, 268–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carson, R. (2011 [1962]). Silent spring. Ringwood: Penguin Modern Classics.Google Scholar
  20. Creyer, E. H., & Ross, W. T. (1996). The impact of corporate behavior on perceived product value. Marketing Letters, 7, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. EGfA. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and animal welfare. Brussels: EuroGroup for Animals.Google Scholar
  22. Elder, S. D., & Dauvergne, P. (2015). Farming for Walmart: The politics of corporate control and responsibility in the global South. The Journal of Peasant Studies. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1043275.Google Scholar
  23. Emel, J., & Neo, H. (Eds.). (2015). Political ecologies of meat (Routledge studies in political ecology). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. European Commission. (2005). Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals (Eurobarometer special report 229). European Commission.Google Scholar
  25. European Commission. (2007). Attitudes of EU citizen towards animal welfare: Special Eurobarometer 270. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  26. Evans, A., & Miele, M. (2008). Consumers’ views about Farm Animal Welfare; Part II: European comparative report based on focus group research (Welfare Quality report No 5). http://www.welfarequality.net
  27. Evans, A. B., & Miele, M. (2012). Between food and flesh: How animals are made to matter (or not to matter) within food consumption practices. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(2), 298–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fox, T., & Vorely, B. (2004). Stakeholder accountability in the UK supermarket sector (Final report of the ‘Race to the Top’ project: Tracking supermarket progress towards a fairer and greener food system). International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
  29. Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare, UFAW Animal Welfare. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Freidberg, S. (2004). The ethical complex of corporate food power. Environment and Planning D—Society and Space, 22(4), 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13, 122–126.Google Scholar
  32. Frooman, J. (1997). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta-analysis of event studies. Business and Society, 36, 221–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gavinelli, A., Rhein, C., & Ferrara, M. (2007). European policies on animal welfare and their effects on global trade. Farm Policy Journal, 4, 11–21.Google Scholar
  34. Gouveia, L., & Juska, A. (2002). Taming nature, taming workers: Constructing the separation between meat consumption and meat production in the U.S. Sociologia Ruralis, 42(4), 370–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gunderson, R. (2015). Meat and inequality: Environmental health consequences of livestock agribusiness. In J. Emel & H. Neo (Eds.), Political ecologies of meat (Routledge studies in political ecology). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Gwilliam, N., & Voisine. N. (2012). Towards Sustainable Animal Rearing: The implications for global food companies. Vigeo Rating: Sustainability Focus.Google Scholar
  37. Harper, G., & Henson, S. (2001). Consumer concerns about animal welfare and the impact on food choice. EU FAIR CT98-3678, Centre for Food Economics Research, The University of Reading.Google Scholar
  38. Harper, G. C., & Makatouni, A. (2002). Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare. British Food Journal, 104(3/4/5), 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harrison, R. (1964). Animal machines. London: Vincent Stuart.Google Scholar
  40. Hartman, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in the food sector. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 38(3), 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hunt, C. (2015). Farm gone factory: Industrial animal agriculture, animal welfare, and the environment. In L. Kemmerer (Ed.), Animals and the environment: Advocacy, activism, and the quest for common ground. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Irvine, L. (2009). Filling the Ark: Animal welfare in disasters. Philadelphia, PA: Templeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Johnson, C. (2015). The political science of farm animal welfare in the US and EU. In J. Emel & H. Neo (Eds.), Political ecologies of meat (Routledge studies in political ecology). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Kemmerer, L. (2015). Eating ecosystems. In L. Kemmerer (Ed.), Animals and the environment: Advocacy, activism, and the quest for common ground. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Kjærnes, U., Bock, B., & Miele, M. (2009). Improving farm animal welfare across Europe: Current initiatives and venues for future strategies. In U. Kjarnes, B. Bock, M. Higgin, & J. Roex (Eds.), Farm animal welfare within the supply chain: Regulation, agriculture and geography (Welfare Quality reports series no. 8, pp. 1–69). Cardiff: Cardiff University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kjærnes, U., Harvey, M., & Warde, A. (2007). Trust in food: A comparative and institutional analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kjaernes, U., & Lavik, R. (2008). Opinions on animal welfare and food consumption in seven European Countries (Welfare Quality® report series). Cardiff: Cardiff University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Kopina, H., & Blewitt, J. (2015). Sustainable business: Key issues (Key issues in environment and sustainability). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Lang, T. (1997). Going public: Food campaigns during the 1980s and early 1990s. In D. F. Smith (Ed.), Nutrition in Britain: Science, scientists and politics in the twentieth century. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Lawrence, F. (2012). Workers who collected freedom food chickens ‘were trafficked and beaten’. The Guardian, Monday, October 29: accessed December 2, 2015.Google Scholar
  51. Lee, E. M., Park, S. Y., Rapert, M. I., & Newman, C. L. (2011). Does perceived consumer fit matter in corporate social responsibility issues? Journal of Business Research, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.040.
  52. Lever, J., & Evans, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: Making slaughter visible? Presented at HSA International Symposium, 16–17th July, 2015, Zagreb, Croatia.Google Scholar
  53. Lever, J., Milbourne, P. (2015). The structural invisibility of outsiders: The role of migrant labour in the meat-processing industry. Sociology. Published on-line first, December 23, 2015, 1–17: DOI:  10.1177/0038038515616354.
  54. Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maloni, M. J., & Brown, M. E. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: An application in the food industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? An analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance (Working Paper). Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  57. Mayfield, L. E., Bennett, R. M., Tranter, R. B., & Wooldridge, M. J. (2007). Consumption of welfare-friendly food products in Great Britain, Italy and Sweden, and how it may be influenced by consumer attitudes to, and behaviour towards, animal welfare attributes. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 15(3), 59–73.Google Scholar
  58. Meadowcroft, J. (2007). Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 9(3), 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Miele, M. (2011). The taste of happiness: Free-range chicken. Environment and Planning A, 43(9), 2076–2090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Miele, M., & Evans, A. (2010). When foods become animals: Ruminations on ethics and responsibility in care-full practices of consumption. Ethics, Place and Environment: A Journal of Philosophy and Geography, 13(2), 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Miele, M., & Lever, J. (2013). Civilizing the market for welfare friendly products in Europe? The techno-ethics of the Welfare Quality Assessment. Geoforum, 48, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Miele, M., & Lever, J. (2014). Improving animal welfare in Europe: Cases of comparative bio-sustainabilities. In T. Marsden & A. Morely (Eds.), Sustainable food systems: Building a new paradigm. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  63. Miele, M., Murdoch, J., & Roe, R. (2005). Animals and ambivalence: Governing Farm Animal Welfare in the European food sector. In V. Higgins & G. Lawrence (Eds.), Agricultural governance: Globalization and the new politics of regulation (pp. 169–185). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Miele, M., Blokhuis, H., Bennett, R., & Bock, B. (2013). Changes in farming and in stakeholder concern for animal welfare. In H. Blokhuis et al. (Eds.), Improving farm animal welfare: Science and society working together: The welfare quality approach. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  65. Morgan, K., & Sonnino, R. (2008). The school food revolution: Public food and the challenge of sustainable development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Padel, S., & Foster, C. (2005). Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour: Understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food. British Food Journal, 107(8), 606–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Peterson, D. K. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business and Society, 43, 296–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pew Commission. (2008). Putting meat on the table: Industrial farm animal production in America (A report of the Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production).Google Scholar
  69. Porter. M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, December.Google Scholar
  70. Ransom, E. (2007). The rise of agricultural animal welfare standards as understood through a neo-institutional lens. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 15(3), 26–44.Google Scholar
  71. Roe, E., & Murdoch, J. (2006). UK market for animal welfare friendly products. Market structure, survey of available products and quality assurance schemes Cardiff, UK (Welfare Quality report).Google Scholar
  72. Roe, E. J., Murdoch, J., & Marsden, T. (2005). The retail of welfare-friendly products: A comparative assessment of the nature of the market for welfare-friendly products in six European Countries. In Science and society improving animal welfare. Welfare Quality Conference: Science and society improving animal welfare, Welfare Quality.Google Scholar
  73. Roex, J., & Miele, M. (2005). Farm animal welfare concerns. Consumers, retailers and producers (Welfare Quality reports No. 1). Cardiff: Cardiff University.Google Scholar
  74. Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow—Environmental issues and options. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  75. Swabe, J. (1999). Animals, disease, and human society: Human-animal relations and the rise of veterinary medicine. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Utting, P., & Marques, J. C. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and regulatory governance: Towards inclusive development? New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  77. Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E., & Tuyttens, F. A. (2007). Segmentation based on consumers’ perceived importance and attitude toward farm animal welfare. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 15(3), 91–107.Google Scholar
  78. Visser, W. (2011). The age of responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the new DNA of business. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  79. Weis, T. (2013). The Ecological Hoofprint. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK
  2. 2.Coventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations