Advertisement

Using Marker-Based Motion Capture to Develop a Head Bobbing Robotic Lizard

  • Anna FrohnwieserEmail author
  • Alexander P. Willmott
  • John C. Murray
  • Thomas W. Pike
  • Anna WilkinsonEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9825)

Abstract

Robotic animals are regularly used in behavioral experiments, typically in experimental interactions with individuals of the species they were modelled on. In order to do so successfully, these robots need to be designed carefully, taking into consideration the specific perceptual system of the model species. We used marker-based motion capture to measure head bobbing in a widely popular lizard species, bearded dragons, and found that head bobbing is highly stereotypic yet differs subtly when displayed towards males and females. These results were then used for the construction of a robotic lizard, with the aim to use it in behavioral and cognitive studies, focusing on social cognition. This is the first study to use motion capture of head bobbing in lizards to inform the design of a robotic animal.

Keywords

Motion capture Robotic lizard Bearded dragon Head bobbing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Franky Mulloy, Joe Moore, Anthony Gorman and Sophie Moszuti for their help with data recording; Suzie Li Wan Po, Meredith Tise, Annali Beese, Matthew Walker and Manuel Jara for their involvement with creating the models and robot; and Dawn Simpson, Emma Huntbach and Hannah Thompson for animal care; and three anonymous reviewers for valuable input.

References

  1. 1.
    Frohnwieser, A., Murray, J., Pike, T., Wilkinson, A.: Using robots to understand animal cognition. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 105, 14–22 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fleishman, L.J., Endler, J.A.: Some comments on visual perception and the use of video playback in animal behavior studies. Acta Ethol. 3, 15–27 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brattstrom, B.H.: Social and thermoregulatory behavior of the bearded dragon Amphibolurus barbatus. Copeia 1971(3), 484–497 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kis, A., Huber, L., Wilkinson, A.: Social learning by imitation in a reptile (Pogona vitticeps). Anim. Cogn. 8(1), 325–331 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abson, K., Palmer, I.: Motion capture: capturing interaction between human and animal. Vis. Comput. 31, 341–353 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moro, F.L., Spröwitz, A., Tuleu, A., Vespignani, M., Tsagarakis, N.G., Ijspeert, A.J., Caldwell, D.G.: Horse-like walking, trotting, and galloping derived from kinematic motion primitives (kMPs) and their application to walk/trot transitions in a compliant quadruped robot. Biol. Cybern. 107, 309–320 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hutchinson, J.: Outdoor Motion capture helps analyse kangaroo posture and hopping mechanisms (2010). http://www.vicon.com. Accessed 1 Mar 2016
  8. 8.
    Kim, C., Shin, H., Lee, H.: Trotting gait analysis of a lizard using motion capture. In: 2013 13th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2013), pp. 1247–1251 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim, C., Shin, H., Jeong, T.: Motion analysis of lizard locomotion using motion capture. In: 2012 12th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, pp. 2143–2147 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, H., Shin, H., Lee, H.: Trotting gait generation based on the lizard biometric data. Trans. Korean Inst. Electr. Eng. 62(10), 1436–1443 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jenssen, T.A.: Display modifiers of Anolis Opalinus (Lacertilia: Iguanidae). Herpetologica 35(1), 21–30 (1979)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lovern, M.B., Jenssen, T.A.: Form emergence and fixation of head bobbing displays in the green anole lizard (Anolis carolinensis): a reptilian model of signal ontogeny. J. Comp. Psychol. 117(2), 133–141 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martins, E.P., Ord, T.J., Davenport, S.W.: Combining motions into complex displays: playbacks with a robotic lizard. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58, 351–360 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Macedonia, J.M., Stamps, J.A.: Species recognition in Anolis grahami (Sauria: Iguanidae): evidence from responses to video playbacks of conspecific and heterospecific displays. Ethology 98, 246–264 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Macedonia, J.M., Clark, D.L., Riley, R.G., Kemp, D.J.: Species recognition of color and motion signals in Anolis grahami: evidence from responses to lizard robots. Behav. Ecol. 24, 846–852 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Partan, S.R., Otovic, P., Price, V.L., Brown, S.E.: Assessing display variability in wild brown Anoles Anolis sagrei using a mechanical lizard model. Curr. Zool. 57, 140–152 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith, C.B., Martins, E.P.: Display plasticity in response to a robotic lizard: signal matching or song sharing in lizards? Ethology 112, 955–962 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ord, T.J., Stamps, J.A.: Alert signals enhance animal communication in “noisy" environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105(48), 18830–18835 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bels, V.L.: Analysis of the display-action-pattern of Anolis clorocyanus (Sauria: Iguanidae). Copeia 1986(4), 963–970 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sellers, W.I., Hirasaki, E.: Markerless 3D motion capture for animal locomotion studies. Biol. Open. 3, 656–668 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Life SciencesUniversity of LincolnLincolnUK
  2. 2.School of Sport and Exercise ScienceUniversity of LincolnLincolnUK
  3. 3.School of Computer ScienceUniversity of LincolnLincolnUK

Personalised recommendations