Advertisement

Empirical Puzzles on Effective Teachers: U.S. Research

Chapter
Part of the Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment book series (MEMA)

Abstract

This chapter addresses the knowledge base on selection and evaluation of effective teachers using recent empirical literature from the United States. It finds that the traditional criteria of teacher licensing, educational credentials, and teaching experience show extremely weak relationships to gains (value-added) in student achievement. Combining classroom observations and measures of teacher value-added seem to hold promise in identifying productive teachers among those already employed, but lack applicability in the initial selection of teachers. Differences among teacher training programs in teacher effectiveness are surprisingly small relative to variance within programs. Issues of how to select teachers and how to reward them for their contributions to student and school productivity remain contested without solid evidence to resolve them.

Keywords

Student Achievement Prospective Teacher Teacher Preparation Teacher Experience Teacher Preparation Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Educational Research Association. (2015). AERA statement on use of Value-Added Models (VAM) for the evaluation of educators and educator preparation programs. Educational Researcher, 10(10), 1–5.Google Scholar
  2. American Statistical Association. (2014). ASA statement on using value-added models for educational assessment. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/policy/pdfs/ASA_VAM_Statement.pdf
  3. Atteberry, A., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2015). Do first impressions matter? Predicting early career teacher effectiveness. AERA Open1(4), DOI:  10.1177/2332858415607834
  4. Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1(2), 176–216.Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416–440.Google Scholar
  6. Bridges, E. M. (1992). The incompetent teacher: Managerial responses. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  7. Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2013). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679.Google Scholar
  8. Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J.L. (2007). How & why do teacher credentials matter for student achievement? Economics of Education Review, 26(6), 673–682.Google Scholar
  9. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.) (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B., & Thoreson, A. (2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 57–77.Google Scholar
  11. Digman, J. (1990). Personality structure of the five factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.Google Scholar
  12. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., L, & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal intervention. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.Google Scholar
  13. Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 129–145.Google Scholar
  14. Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (2001). Evaluating the evidence of teacher certification: A rejoinder. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 79–86.Google Scholar
  15. Goldhaber, D., Liddle, S., & Theobald, R. (2013). The gateway to the profession: Assessing teacher preparation programs based on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 34, 29–44.Google Scholar
  16. Goldhaber, D., Walch, J., & Gabele, B. (2014). Does the model matter? Exploring the relationship between different student achievement-based teacher assessments. Statistics and Public Policy, 1(1), 28–39.Google Scholar
  17. Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205.Google Scholar
  18. Grossman, P., Cohen, J., Ronfeldt, M., & Brown, L. (2014). The test matters: The relationship between classroom observation score and teacher value added on multiple types of assessment. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 293–303.Google Scholar
  19. Guarino, C., Reckase, M., & Wooldridge, J. (2015). Can value-added measures of teacher performance be trusted? Education Finance and Policy, 10(1), 117–156.Google Scholar
  20. Haertel, E. H. (2013). Reliability and validity of inferences about teachers based on student test scores [PDF document]. William H. Angoff Memorial Lecture Series, Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from http://www.nnstoy.org/download/vam-and-student-growth-models/VAM%20Angoff%20lecture%20ETS.pdf
  21. Hanushek, E. A. (1971). Teacher characteristics and gains in student achievement: Estimation using micro data. American Economic Review, 61(2), 280–288.Google Scholar
  22. Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141–164.Google Scholar
  23. Hanushek E.A., Kain J.F., O’Brien D.M., & Rivkin SG. (2005). The market for teacher quality. NBERWork. Pap. 11154.Google Scholar
  24. Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2006). Teacher Quality. In E. A. Hanushek & F. Welch, (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education, Vol 2 (pp 1051–1078). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  25. Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2010). Generalization about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100(2), 267–271.Google Scholar
  26. Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality, & student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 798–812.Google Scholar
  27. Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2014). Skills, productivity and evaluation of teacher performance. Economics of Education Review, 40, 183–204.Google Scholar
  28. Harris, D. N., Ingle, W. K., & Rutledge, S. A. (2014). How teacher evaluation methods matter for accountability: A comparative analysis of teacher effectiveness ratings by principal & teacher value-added measures, American Educational Research Journal, 51(1), 73–112.Google Scholar
  29. Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Economics, 19(4), 451–464.Google Scholar
  30. Inkeles, A. (1966). The socialization of competence. Harvard Educational Review, 36(3), 265–283.Google Scholar
  31. Jackson, K. (2012). Non-cognitive ability, test scores, and teacher quality: evidence from 9th grade teachers in North Carolina (NBER working paper no 18624). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research website http://www.nber.org/papers/w18624
  32. Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2008). Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education. Journal of Labor Economics, 26(1), 101–136.Google Scholar
  33. Jacob, B. A., Lefgren, L., & Sims, D. P. (2008). The persistence of teacher-induced learning. Journal of Human Resources, 45(4), 915–943.Google Scholar
  34. Jacob, B., Rockoff, J. E., Taylor, E. S., Lindy, B., & Rosen, R. (2016). Teacher applicant hiring and teacher performance: Evidence from DC public schools (NBER Working Paper Number 22054) Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research website http://www.nber.org/papers/w22054
  35. Kane, T. J., Rockoff, J.E., & Staiger, D. O. (2008). “What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 615–631.Google Scholar
  36. Kinsler, J. (2012). Beyond levels & growth: Estimating teacher value-added and its persistence. Journal of Human Resources, 47(3), 722–763.Google Scholar
  37. Koedel, C., & Betts, J. R. (2007). Re-examining the role of teacher quality in the educational production function (Working Paper No 0708). Retrieved from Department of Economics, University of Missouri website http://economics.missouri.edu/working-papers/2007/wp0708_koedel.pdf
  38. Levin, H. M. (2012). More than just test scores. Prospects, 42(3), 269–284.Google Scholar
  39. Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students’ evaluation of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1187–1197.Google Scholar
  40. McCaffrey, D. F., Sass, T. R., Lockwood, J. R. & Mihaly, K. (2009). “The intertemporal variability of teacher effectiveness estimates. Education Finance & Policy, 4(4), 572–606.Google Scholar
  41. McKenzie, P., Santiago, P., Sliwka, P. & Hiroyuki, H. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  42. Papay, J. (2011). Different tests different answers: The stability of teacher value-added estimates across different outcome measures. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 163–193.Google Scholar
  43. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.Google Scholar
  44. Rockoff, J. E., Jacob, B. A., Kane, T. J., & Staiger D. O. (2011). Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one? Educational Finance & Policy, 6(1), 43–74.Google Scholar
  45. Rothstein, J. (2009). Student sorting and bias in value-added estimation: Selection on observables and unobservables. Educational Finance & Policy, 4(4), 537–571.Google Scholar
  46. Rothstein, J. (2010). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 175–214.Google Scholar
  47. Spence, M. A. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355–374.Google Scholar
  48. Staiger, D. O., & Rockoff, J. E. (2010). Search for effective teachers with imperfect information. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 97–117.Google Scholar
  49. Wayne, A. J., & Young, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73, 89–122.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew York CityUSA

Personalised recommendations