Advertisement

Conceptualizing Resource Integration to Advance Service Innovation

  • Maria Colurcio
  • Angela Caridà
  • Bo Edvardsson
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter provides a literature review of the resource integration (RI) phenomenon through a bibliometric analysis including 1250 ISI listed journal articles. The main contribution of the study is an overview and analysis of how RI has been portrayed in marketing and management research and the six most important RI dimensions or themes. Furthermore, the analysis highlights two main research areas and approaches on RI: the traditional school of good-dominant logic (GD logic) and the recent school of service-dominant logic (SD logic).

Keywords

Service Ecosystem Open Innovation Supply Chain Management Strategic Management Service Innovation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arthur, B. W. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ballantyne, D., Frow, P., Varey, R. J., & Payne, A. (2011). Value propositions as communication practice: Taking a wider view. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benavides-Velasco, C. A., Quintana-García, C., & Guzmán-Parra, V. F. (2013). Trends in family business research. Small Business Economics, 40(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharya, S., & Basu, P. K. (1998). Mapping a research area at the micro level using co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 43(3), 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (2011). Co-opetition. New York: Random House LLC.Google Scholar
  7. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research-the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). The era of open innovation. Managing Innovation and Change, 127(3), 34–41.Google Scholar
  10. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, H. M. (1982). Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edvardsson, B., Kleinaltenkamp, M., Tronvoll, B., McHugh, P., & Windahl, C. (2014). Institutional logics matter when coordinating resource integration. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edvardsson, B., Skålén, P., & Tronvoll, B. (2012). Service systems as a foundation for resource integration and value co-creation. Review of Marketing Research, 9(2), 79–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edvardsson, B., & Tronvoll, B. (2013). A new conceptualization of service innovation grounded in SD logic and service systems. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 5(1), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gidhagen, M., Persson Ridell, O., & Sörhammar, D. (2011). The orchestrating firm: Value creation in the video game industry. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 21(4), 392–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haase, M., & Kleinaltenkamp, M. (2011). Property rights design and market process: Implications for market theory, marketing theory, and SD Logic. Journal of Macromarketing, 31(2), 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hakanen, T., & Jaakkola, E. (2012). Cocreating customer focused solutions within business networks: A service perspective. Journal of Service Management, 23(4), 593–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamel, G., Doz, Y., & Prahalad, C. (1989). Collaborate with your competitors. Harvard Business Review, 67(1), 133–139.Google Scholar
  20. He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133.Google Scholar
  21. Hibbert, S., Winklhofer, H., & Temerak, M. S. (2012). Customers as resource integrators: Toward a model of customer learning. Journal of Service Research, 15(3), 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Högström, C., & Tronvoll, B. (2012). The enactment of socially embedded service systems: Fear and resourcing in the London Borough of Sutton. European Management Journal, 30(5), 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaakkola, E., & Alexander, M. (2014). The role of customer engagement behavior in value co-creation: A service system perspective. Journal of Service Research, 17(3), 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaakkola, E., & Hakanen, T. (2013). Value co-creation in solution networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(1), 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kleinaltenkamp, M., Brodie, R., Frow, P., & Hughes, T. (2012). Resource integration. Marketing Theory, 12(2), 201–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Korkman, O., Storbacka, K., & Harald, B. (2010). Practices as markets: Value co-creation in e-invoicing. Australasian Marketing Journal, 18(4), 236–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lempinen, H., & Rajala, R. (2014). Exploring multi-actor value creation in IT service processes. Journal of Information Technology, 29(2), 170–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Löbler, H. (2013). Service-dominant networks: An evolution from the service-dominant logic perspective. Journal of Service Management, 24(4), 420–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Löbler, H., & Lusch, R. F. (2014). Signs and practices as resources in IT-related service innovation. Service Science, 6(3), 190–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 155–175.Google Scholar
  31. Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2012). The forum on markets and marketing (FMM): Advancing service-dominant logic. Marketing Theory, 12(2), 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lusch, R. F., & Webster, F. E. (2011). A stakeholder-unifying, cocreation philosophy for marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 31(2), 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Vargo, S. L., Dagger, T. S., Sweeney, J. C., & van Kasteren, Y. (2012). Health care customer value cocreation practice styles. Journal of Service Research, 15(4), 370–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mele, C., Russo-Spena, T., & Colurcio, M. (2010). Co-creating value innovation through resource integration. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(1), 60–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moeller, S. (2008). Customer integration - a key to an implementation perspective of service provision. Journal of Service Research, 11(2), 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Muñoz-Leiva, F., Viedma-del-Jesús, M. I., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & López-Herrera, A. G. (2012). An application of co-word analysis and bibliometric maps for detecting the most highlighting themes in the consumer behaviour research from a longitudinal perspective. Quality & Quantity, 46(4), 1077–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ngo, L. V., & O’Cass, A. (2009). Creating value offerings via operant resource-based capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(1), 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paredes, M. R., Barrutia, J. M., & Echebarria, C. (2014). Resources for value co-creation in e-commerce: A review. Electronic Commerce Research, 14(2), 111–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pels, J., Möller, K., & Saren, M. (2009). Do we really understand business marketing? Getting beyond the RM and BM matrimony. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24(5/6), 322–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Persson, O. D., Danell, R., & Wiborg Schneider, J. (2009). How to use bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In F. Åström, R. Danell, B. Larsen, & J. Schneider (Eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday (pp. 9–24). Leuven: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.Google Scholar
  41. Peters, L. (2012). The role of the knowledgeable customer in business network learning, value creation, and innovation. Review of Marketing Research, 9, 127–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peters, L. D., Gassenheimer, J. B., & Johnston, W. J. (2009). Marketing and the structuration of organizational learning. Marketing Theory, 9(3), 341–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peters, L. D., Löbler, H., Brodie, R. J., Breidbach, C. F., Hollebeek, L. D., Smith, S. D., et al. (2014). Theorizing about resource integration through service-dominant logic. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pinto, M., Pulgarín, A., & Escalona, M. I. (2014). Viewing information literacy concepts: A comparison of two branches of knowledge. Scientometrics, 98, 2311–2329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Plé, L., & Chumpitaz Cáceres, R. (2010). Not always co-creation: Introducing interactional co-destruction of value in service-dominant logic. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(6), 430–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co‐creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sakata, I., Sasaki, H., Akiyama, M., Sawatani, Y., Shibata, N., & Kajikawa, Y. (2013). Bibliometric analysis of service innovation research: Identifying knowledge domain and global network of knowledge. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(6), 1085–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Skålén, P., Gummerus, J., von Koskull, C., & Magnusson, P. R. (2015). Exploring value propositions and service innovation: A service-dominant logic study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(2), 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith, A. M. (2013). The value co-destruction process: A customer resource perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 47(11/12), 1889–1909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Trott, P., & Hartmann, D. (2009). Why open innovation is old wine in new bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 715–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Truong, Y., Simmons, G., & Palmer, M. (2012). Reciprocal value propositions in practice: Constraints in digital markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Turiera, T., & Cross, S. (2013). Co-business: 50 examples of business collaboration. Infonomia.Google Scholar
  54. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). Bibliometric mapping of the computational intelligence field. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 15(5), 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & van den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405–2416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vargo, S. L. (2008). Customer integration and value creation: Paradigmatic traps and perspectives. Journal of Service Research, 11(2), 211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It’s all B2B… beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. White, S. W., & Badinelli, R. D. (2012). A model for efficiency-based resource integration in services. European Journal of Operational Research, 217(2), 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhu, W., & Guan, J. (2013). A bibliometric study of service innovation research: Based on complex network analysis. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1195–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zimmermann, E. W. (1951). World resources and industries. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Legal, Historical, Economic and Social SciencesUniversity Magna Græcia of CatanzaroCatanzaroItaly
  2. 2.CTFKarlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden

Personalised recommendations