Demographics and Market Segmentation: China and India
China and India are the two most populous countries in the world but have followed different demographic courses. Both countries have experienced substantial expansion of their markets for a range of commodities. However, dissimilar household composition and socioeconomic paths have affected household preferences in the two countries. The paper reviews macro demographic trends that have led to different demographic structures with significant implications for productivity and household purchasing power and discretionary spending in the two countries. It then conducts an examination of household expenditures based on household surveys undertaken in 2005 and assesses similarities and disparities in household preferences for broad categories of goods and services in rural and urban areas, and also for households with varying levels of income. This provides a basis for hypothesis building concerned with market growth for progressive commodities, in view of current demographic structures in the two countries and projected fertility and population growth.
KeywordsIncome Household expenditures Discretionary spending Demographic trends
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). Household expenditure survey – Summary of results – 2003–04. Catalogue No. 6530.0. Canberra.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics (BOL). (2007). Consumer Expenditures in 2005. Report 998, February 2007. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor.Google Scholar
- Cullen, T. (2007, March). PPP versus the market: Which weight matters? Finance & Development, 44(1).Google Scholar
- Jaffrelot, C., & van der Veer, P. (Eds.). (2008). Patterns of middle class consumption in India and China. Sage Publications: New Delhi.Google Scholar
- Kravis, I. B., Heston, A., & Summers, R. (1982). World product and income: International comparisons of real gross product. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Kumar, T. K., Mallick, S., & Holla, J. (2009, April). Estimating consumption deprivation in India using survey data: State-level rural-urban analysis before and during reform period. Journal of Development Studies, 45(4), 441–470.Google Scholar
- Lancaster, G., Maitra, P., & Ray, R. (2008, June). Household expenditure patterns and gender bias: Evidence from selected Indian states. Oxford Development Studies, 36(2), 133–157.Google Scholar
- McEwan, W., Fang, X., Zhang, C., & Burkholder, R. (2006). Inside the mind of the Chinese consumer. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 68–76.Google Scholar
- National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2005). Statistical yearbook of China. Beijing: Statistical Publishing House of China.Google Scholar
- National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO). (2006). Level and pattern of consumer expenditure, 2004–05. Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.Google Scholar
- National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO). (2007a). Household consumption of various goods and services in India, 2004–05, Vol. I: Major states and all-India. Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.Google Scholar
- National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO). (2007b). Household consumption of various goods and services in India, 2004–05, Vol. II: Minor states and Union Territories. Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.Google Scholar
- Ray, R. (2001). Analysis of a time series of household expenditure surveys for India. Review of Economics and Statistics, 62(9), 595–602.Google Scholar
- Statistics Bureau (SB). (2006). Family income and expenditure survey 2005. Tokyo: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. www.stat.go.jp/english/data. Accessed 19 June 2008.
- Subramanian, S. V., Nandy S., Kelly M., Gordon D., & Davey Smith G. (2004, April 3). Patterns and distribution of tobacco consumption in India: cross sectional multilevel evidence from the 1998–9 national family health survey. BMJ, 328(7443), 801–806. doi: 10.1136/bmj.7443.81.
- United Nations (UN). (2007). World population prospects – The 2006 revision. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
- World Bank (WB). (2008). 2005 international comparison program – Tables of final results. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar