Fossils, Smartphones, Geodiversity, Internet, and Outdoor Activities: A Technological Geoeducational Bundle



Today, more people live in urban areas than in rural ones. Hence, there is a strong case for using urban geodiversity, rocks, fossils, landforms, etc., in outdoor geological educational and geoawareness activities. On the other hand, the present-day world is deeply influenced by technology. Smartphones, GPS-capable devices, tablet computers, and Internet access are widely available technologies to an increasingly large portion of the world’s population. Therefore, why not combine the two facts expressed above – mostly urban population with access to technology – and use them in outdoor geoeducational and geoawareness activities in urban areas and also in natural environments? In this work, a series of activities and experiments in geoeducation and geoawareness actions using commonly available technology, set both in urban and natural environments, will be presented and briefly discussed. These activities have been used in middle school, high school, and university teaching and in science popularization activities mainly fostered by undergraduate and graduate students and teachers of the Department of Geology of the University of Lisbon: GPS-assisted geological trails, QR codes for urban fossils, geotagged geodiversity photos, etc. Used collectively they constitute a technological geoeducational bundle, contributing to the attractiveness and the success of outdoor geological activities. This process is an interactive one, because, on the one hand, new technologies are being used in geoeducation, but, on the other hand, the usage they were originally designed for is being modified and adapted in novel ways as a result of the know-how ensued from their educational use.


Geodiversity Fossils Urban geology Technology Smartphones Internet Outdoor activities 


  1. Antunes, M. T. (1976). Dinossáurios Eocretácicos de Lagosteiros. Ciências da Terra, 1, 1–35.Google Scholar
  2. Bottino, B., Fiães, M. da S., & Serra, R. (2014). Geodiversidade urbana: Aplicações pedagógicas na divulgação das Geociências. Relatório da Unidade Curricular “Projecto”, Departamento de Geologia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa. 57 pp. (Unpublished report.)Google Scholar
  3. Burek, C., & Stilwell, R. (2007). Geodiversity trail: Walking through the past on the University’s Chester campus (29 pp.). Chester: University of Chester Press.Google Scholar
  4. Colardyn, D., & Bjornavold, J. (2004). Validation of formal, non-formal and informal learning. European Journal of Education, 39(1), 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Downward, S., Livingstone, D., Lynch, K., & Mount, N. (2008). Podcasts and locations. In G. Salmon & P. Edirisingha (Eds.), Podcasting for learning in universities (pp. 57–69). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Doyle, P., & Bennett, M. R. (1998). Earth heritage conservation: Past, present and future agendas. In M. R. Bennett & P. Doyle (Eds.), Issues in environmental geology: A British perspective (pp. 41–67). London: Geological Society.Google Scholar
  7. Edgley, C. (Ed.). (2013). The drama of social life. A dramaturgical handbook (p. 388). Dorchester: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  8. Ericsson Mobility Report. (2015). 70 percent of world’s population using smartphones by 2020. Press release, June 3, 2015. Available at [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  9. Esparza-Lozano, D. (2014). El diseño del suelo: el papel del pavimento en la creación de la imagen de la ciudad (416 pp.). PhD thesis, Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
  10. Gray, M. (2004). Geodiversity, valuing and conserving abiotic nature (434 pp.). Chichester: Willey.Google Scholar
  11. Larwood, J. G., & Durham, E. (2005). Involving people in geodiversity (16 pp.). Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee.Google Scholar
  12. Lee, J.-K., Lee, I.-S., & Kwon, Y.-J. (2011). Scan & learn! Use of quick response codes & smartphones in a biology field study. The American Biology Teacher, 73(8), 485–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lockley, M. G., & dos Santos, V. F. (1993). A preliminary report on sauropod trackways from the Avelino site, Sesimbra Region, Upper Jurassic, Portugal. Gaia, 6, 38–42.Google Scholar
  14. MacFadyen, C., & McMillan, A. (2002). The links between our natural and built heritage: How we can use urban landscape and geological resources to aid understanding and appreciation of the wider landscape. In Natural and cultural landscapes: The geological foundation (pp. 245–248). Dublin: Royal Irish Academy.Google Scholar
  15. Matherson, L., Wright, V., Inman, C., & Wilson, E. (2008). Get up, Get out with geocaching: Engaging technology for the social studies classroom. Social Studies Research and Practice, 3(3), 80–85.Google Scholar
  16. Mayoral, E., Santos, A., Silva, C.M. da., & Cachão, M. (2009a). “Satellite Geology” (Geología por Satélite - GPS): Autonomous field geological and palaeontological learning activities in Huelva (Southern Spain). In Proceedings EDULEARN09 conference, Barcelona (pp. 1396–1407).Google Scholar
  17. Mayoral, E., Santos, A., Silva, C.M. da., & Cachão, M. (2009b). GPS – Geología por Satélite, Itinerarios de descubierta paleontological. 01_Lepe, Los Barrancos. Website available at [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  18. Mayoral, E., Santos, A., Silva, C.M. da., & Cachão, M. (2009c). GPS – Geología por Satélite, Itinerarios de descubierta paleontological. 01_Lepe, Los Barrancos. Field questionnaire available at [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  19. Mayoral, E., Santos, A., & Silva, C. M. da. (2011). Fósiles en la ciudad_1: Paleontología urbana en la ciudad de Huelva. Website available at [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  20. Mayoral, E., Parra, M., Santos, A., & Silva, C. M. da (2012). Paleontología urbana en Andalucía: una alternativa en tiempos de crisis. Naturaleza Aragonesa, 29, 11–15.Google Scholar
  21. Mayoral, E., Santos, A., & Silva, C. M. da. (2013). Fósiles en la ciudad_2: Paleontología urbana en la ciudad de Huelva. Website available at [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  22. Parra, M.C., Santos, A., Mayoral, E. & Silva, C.M. da. (2012). Experiencias de aprovechamiento educativo y turístico de recursos geológicos en las ciudades de Huelva, Sevilla y Córdoba (Andalucía, España). Comunicaciones del XVII Simposio sobre Enseñanza de la Geología. Publicaciones Universidade de Huelva, Huelva, 64–70.Google Scholar
  23. Population Reference Bureau. (2014). World population data sheet, 2014. Population Reference Bureau, Washington. Available at [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  24. Prosser, C. D., & Larwood, J. G. (1994). Urban site conservation – An area to build on? In D. O’Halloran, C. Green, M. Harley, M. Stanley, & J. Knill (Eds.), Geological and landscape conservation (pp. 347–355). London: Geological Society.Google Scholar
  25. QR Chiado. (2015). Reprogramming the city: Unlocking the potential of existing urban assets. Available at [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  26. Rodrigues, L. A., & Agostinho, M. (2016). Lagos. Guia de Geologia e Paleontologia Urbana (123 pp.). Lagos: Centro de Ciência Viva de Lagos.Google Scholar
  27. Santos, V. F. (2008). Pegadas de dinossáurios de Portugal. Museu Nacional de História Natural (123 pp.). Lisbon: Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar
  28. Santos, V. F., Lockley, M. G., Moratalla, J., & Galopim de Carvalho, A. M. (1992). The longest dinosaur trackway in the world? Interpretations of cretaceous footprints from Carenque, near Lisbon, Portugal. Gaia, 5, 18–27.Google Scholar
  29. Santos, V. F., Silva, C. M. da, & Rodrigues, L. A. (2008). Dinosaur track sites from Portugal: Scientific and cultural significance. Oryctos, 324–334.Google Scholar
  30. Shin, D.-H., Jung, J., & Chang, B.-H. (2012). The psychology behind QR codes: User experience perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1417–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Silva, C.M. da. (2007). Fósseis na cidade, Paleontologia e Geologia urbanas em Almada. Website available at [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  32. Silva, C. M. da. (2008). Darwin, a Geologia e o paradoxo da biodiversidade. Al-Madan, II sér., 16: 8–11. Available at
  33. Silva, C. M. da. (2009a). Fósseis ao Virar da Esquina: Um percurso pela Paleontologia e pela geodiversidade urbana de Lisboa. Paleolusitana, 1, 459–463. Available at
  34. Silva, C. M. da. (2009b). Fósseis: na sala de aula e fora dela. Proceedings XXIX Curso de Actualização de Professores em Geociências. Escola Superior de Educação de Lisboa, Lisbon, pp. 77–80. Unpublished report available at [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  35. Silva, C.M. da. (2010). A Geologia e a Imagem. In Pombo Martins, O.M. & di Marco, S. (eds.), As Imagens com que a Ciência se Faz. Centro de Filosofia das Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa (CFCUL) e Editora Fim de Século, Lisbon, pp. 195–221.Google Scholar
  36. Silva, C. M. da. (2011a). “Fósseis ao Virar da Esquina”: Percurso urbano de interpretação paleontológica. Website available at [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  37. Silva, C. M. da. (2011b). “Fósseis ao Virar da Esquina”: Percurso urbano de interpretação paleontológica. Leaflet available at (p. 2); (p. 1) [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  38. Silva, C. M. da. (2013). Geodiversidade no Campus da FCUL, Introdução. Website available at [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  39. Silva, C. M. da. (2014). Geodiversidade no Campus da FCUL. Microguia de campo: fósseis de crinóides. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1945.8721. Leaflet available at [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  40. Silva, C. M. da, & Cachão, M. (1998). Paleontologia Urbana: Percursos citadinos de interpretação e educação (paleo)ambiental. Comunicações do Instituto Geológico e Mineiro, 84(2), H33–H35.Google Scholar
  41. Silva, C. M. da, & Cachão, M. (2007). GPS – Geologia Por Satélite. 4_Lá no alto há pegadas de dinossáurios. Website available at [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  42. Tenreiro-Vieira, C. (2004). Produção e avaliação de actividades de aprendizagem de ciências para promover o pensamento crítico dos alunos. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 33/6 ((
  43. The Geological Society of America. (2013). How to submit an EarthCache. Guidelines for Submittal. Available at [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  44. United Nations. (2014). World Urbanization Prospects. The 2014 Revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York, ST/ESA/SER.A/352. Available at [cited 29 Feb 2016].
  45. Ventura, C., Pires, A. R., Ribeiro, M., & Silva, C. M. da. (2010). Paleontologia, Geodiversidade urbana e geoconservação: O exemplo da cidade de Almada (Portugal). Publicaciones del Seminario de Paleontología de Zaragoza (SEPAZ), 9, 43–46.Google Scholar
  46. Vitale, J. L., McCabe, M., Tedesco, S., & Wideman-Johnston, T. (2012). Cache me if you can: Reflections on geocaching from junior/intermediate teacher candidates. International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education, 1(1), 2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Welsh, K., & France, D. (2012). Smartphones and fieldwork. Geography, 97(1), 47–51.Google Scholar
  48. Welsh, K., France, D., Whalley, W. B., & Park, J. R. (2012). Geotagging photographs in student fieldwork. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(3), 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zecha, S., & Hilger, L. (2015). EarthCaches: An opportunity for learning geoscience; a pilot study for glaciomorphologically themed EarthCaches. Journal for Geographic Information Science, 1, 324–334.Google Scholar
  50. Zinko, Y. (1994). Development and management of geological and geomorphological conservation features within the urban areas of the western Ukraine. In D. O’Halloran, C. Green, M. Harley, M. Stanley, & J. Knill (Eds.), Geological and landscape conservation (pp. 231–235). London: Geological Society.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Geologia e Instituto Dom Luiz de geociências, Faculdade de CiênciasUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations