The foreskin is usually still fused with the glans at birth. As childhood progresses, they gradually separate. There are different reports and a lot of debates about the age at which the foreskin can be retracted safely as there is no consensus about the time of complete separation between the glans and the inner prepuce. The other problem is the inability of many physicians to distinguish between physiological phimosis, pathological phimosis and paraphimosis, and their misdiagnosis that leads to unnecessary parents’ anxiety and over-referrals to urologists for circumcision or consultation. Of these cases referred to a urology clinic, in one study, it was detected that only 8–14.4 % had a “true” phimosis which necessitate surgical intervention.
KeywordsPhysiological phimosis Pathological phimosis Preputial stenosis and paraphimosis
- 1.TKumar P, Deb M, Das K. Preputial adhesions–a misunderstood entity.Indian. J Pediatr. 2009;76(8):829–32.Google Scholar
- 2.McGregor TB, Pike JG, Leonard MP. Phimosis—a diagnostic dilemma? Can. J Urol. 2005;12(2):2598–602.Google Scholar
- 5.Sneppen I, Thorup J. Foreskin morbidity in uncircumcised males. Pediatrics. 2016;137(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4340.
- 8.He Y, Zhou XH. Balloon dilation treatment of phimosis in boys. Report of 512 cases. Chin Med J (Engl). 1991;104(6):491–3.Google Scholar