Abstract
This chapter presents the conclusion of the book. It starts by summarising the emergent theory of self-protecting and the key concepts that make up the theory. The theoretical contribution of the book is highlighted as well as the significance of the book. The chapter also presents how the aims and objectives of the book were achieved before finally discussing the limitation of the book and implication for future research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), p. 169.
Boer, H., & Seydel, E. R. (1996). Protection motivation theory. In M. Conner & P. Norman, (Eds.), Predicting health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models. Buckingham: The Open University, pp. 95–120.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
de Catanzaro, D. (1991). Evolutionary limits to self-preservation. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12(1), 13–28. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(91)90010-N
Demetis, D. S. (2009). Data growth, the new order of information manipulation and consequences for the AML/ATF domains. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 12(4), 353–353.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Elliott, N., & Lazenbatt, A. (2005). How to recognise a ‘quality’ grounded theory research study. The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing: A Quarterly Publication of the Royal Australian Nursing Federation, 22(3), 48.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. (2002). Constructivist grounded theory? 3(3). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/825
Glaser, B. (2008). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23–38.
Guadagnoli, E., & Ward, P. (1998). Patient participation in decision-making. Social Science & Medicine, 47(3), 329–339. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00059-8
Hammersley, M. (2013). What’s wrong with ethnography? New York: Taylor & Francis.
Karni, E., & Schmeidler, D. (1986). Self-preservation as a foundation of rational behavior under risk. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 7(1), 71–81. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(86)90022-3
Kohlberg, L. (1973). The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. The Journal of Philosophy, 70(18), 630–646. doi:10.2307/2025030
Masciandaro, D. (1999). Money laundering: The economics of regulation. European Journal of Law and Economics, 7(3), 225–240.
Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 320(7226), 50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1117321/pdf/50.pdf
Mendelow, A. (1991). ‘Stakeholder Mapping’. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Systems, Cambridge, MA.
Murphy, E., Dingwall, R., Greatbatch, D., Parker, S., & Watson, P. (1998). Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: A review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England), 2(16), 3.
Nardo, M. (2006). Building synergies between theory and practice. Journal of Financial Crime, 13(3), 292–299.
Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of corporate moral development. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(4), 273.
Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change1. The Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 93–114.
Scholz, J. T. (1984). Voluntary compliance and regulatory enforcement. Law & Policy, 6(4), 385–404. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.1984.tb00334.x
Smith, K. V., & Godfrey, N. S. (2002). Being a good nurse and doing the right thing: A qualitative study. Nursing Ethics, 9(3), 301–312.
Sutinen, J. G., & Kuperan, K. (1999). A socio-economic theory of regulatory compliance. International Journal of Social Economics, 26(1/2/3), 174–193.
Takats, E. (2011). A theory of ‘crying wolf’: The economics of money laundering enforcement. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 27(1), 32–78.
TEDSalon. (2010). Rory Sutherland: Sweat the small stuff. London.
TEDxStanford. (2012). Baba Shiv: Sometimes it’s good to give up the driver’s seat. Stanford.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Urquhart, C. (2013). Grounded theory for qualitative research: A practical guide. Los Angeles, CA, London: SAGE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bello, A.U. (2016). Conclusion. In: Improving Anti-Money Laundering Compliance. Palgrave Studies in Risk, Crime and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43264-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43264-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43263-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43264-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)