Abstract
In the field of futurology, sometimes referred to as future studies, the goal is to study possible, probable, and preferable futures, and seek a systematic understanding of past and present in order to determine the likelihood of future events and trends [1]. As fascinating as futurology sounds, it is not astonishing that there is a constant debate as to whether futurology is art or science since there are essential differences between both. Scientific studies rely on objective observation, experimentation, and peer review, with the overarching goal to increase human understanding of the universe, whereas art expresses knowledge, skills, and abilities often in the form of subjective representation [1]. Although art and science are in fundamental character very dissimilar, futurology often combines both worlds [2].
Keywords
Virtuality Machine Augmented Reality Incremental Innovation Disruptive Innovation Deutsche MarkReferences
- 1.Ford, A.: Singularity panel. In: Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies (2013)Google Scholar
- 2.Merrill, M.: Futurology: The Art of Science of Predicting Scientifically the Future. American Classical College Press (1979)Google Scholar
- 3.Watts, A.: Great moments in failed predictions. https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/01/19/great-moments-in-failed-predictions/ (2013)
- 4.Greenwald, J.: Arthur C. Clarke on Life. WIRED (2004)Google Scholar
- 5.Goldstein, E.: Sensation and Perception. Cengage Learning (2009)Google Scholar
- 6.OculusVR. Oculus Rift. http://www.oculusvr.com (2013)
- 7.Valve Corp. HTC Vive. https://www.htcvive.com (2015)
- 8.Microsoft. Microsoft HoloLens. https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-hololens/en-us (2016)
- 9.Milgram, P., Kishino, F.: A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. In: IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, Special issue on Networked Reality (1994)Google Scholar
- 10.Milgram, P., Drascic, D., Grodski, J., Restogi, A., Zhai, S., Zhou, C.: Merging real and virtual worlds. In: Proceedings of IMAGINA’95 (1995)Google Scholar
- 11.Delaney, B.: Sex, Drugs and Tessellation: The Truth About Virtual Reality, as Revealed in the Pages of CyberEdge Journal. CyberEdge Information Services (2014)Google Scholar
- 12.Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D.J., DeFanti, T.A., Kenyon, R.V., Hart, J.C.: The CAVE, audio visual experience automatic virtual environment. Commun. ACM 35(6), 64–72 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Buxton, W.: The Long Nose of Innovation. VIEWPOINT (2008)Google Scholar
- 14.Assink, M.: Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: a conceptual model. Eur. J. Innov. Manage. 9(2), 215–233 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Myers, B.: A brief history of human computer interaction technology. ACM Interact. 5(2), 44–54 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Levy, S.: Insanely Great: The Life and Times of Macintosh, the Computer that Changed Everything. Penguin Books (2000)Google Scholar
- 17.Stocker, C.: Aus die maus – ein nachrufGoogle Scholar
- 18.Johnson, E.: Touch display—a novel input/output device for computers. Electron. Lett. 1(8), 219–220 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Mehta, N.: A flexible machine interface. Master’s thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Toronto (1982)Google Scholar
- 20.Krueger, M., Gionfriddo, T., Hinrichsen, K.: Videoplace—an artificial reality. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 35–40 (1985)Google Scholar
- 21.Sutherland, I.: A head-mounted three dimensional display. Proc. AFIPS Fall Joint Comput. Conf. 33, 757–764 (1968)Google Scholar
- 22.Leibach, H.: Should you buy the hype? an inside look at the virtual reality landscape. http://singularityhub.com/2015/08/02/ (2015)