Multiple Seeds Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Mining Boolean Association Rules

  • Mir Md. Jahangir KabirEmail author
  • Shuxiang Xu
  • Byeong Ho Kang
  • Zongyuan Zhao
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9794)


Most of the association rule mining algorithms use a single seed for initializing a population without paying attention to the effectiveness of an initial population in an evolutionary learning. Recently, researchers show that an initial population has significant effects on producing good solutions over several generations of a genetic algorithm. There are two significant challenges raised by single seed based genetic algorithms for real world applications: (1) solutions of a genetic algorithm are varied, since different seeds generate different initial populations, (2) it is a hard process to define an effective seed for a specific application. To avoid these problems, in this paper we propose a new multiple seeds based genetic algorithm (MSGA) which generates multiple seeds from different domains of a solution space to discover high quality rules from a large data set. This approach introduces m-domain model and m-seeds selection process through which the whole solution space is subdivided into m-number of same size domains and from each domain it selects a seed. By using these seeds, this method generates an effective initial population to perform an evolutionary learning of the fitness value of each rule. As a result, this method obtains strong searching efficiency at the beginning of the evolution and achieves fast convergence along with the evolution. MSGA is tested with different mutation and crossover operators for mining interesting Boolean association rules from different real world data sets and compared the results with different single seeds based genetic algorithms.


Multiple seeds based genetic algorithm Boolean association rules Initial population Conditional probability Evolutionary learning 


  1. 1.
    Mukhopadhyay, A., Maulik, U., Bandyopadhyay, S., Coello, C.A.C.: A survey of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for data mining: Part I. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18(1), 4–19 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hipp, J., Güntzer, U., Nakhaeizadeh, G.: Algorithms for association rule mining—a general survey and comparison. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 2(1), 58–64 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    del Jesus, M.J., Gámez, J.A., González, P., Puerta, J.M.: On the discovery of association rules by means of evolutionary algorithms. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 1(5), 397–415 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borgelt, C.: Efficient implementations of apriori and eclat. In: IEEE ICDM Workshop on Frequent Item Set Mining Implementations, pp. 280–296 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zaki, M.J.: Scalable algorithms for association mining. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 12(3), 372–390 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qodmanan, H.R., Nasiri, M., Minaei-Bidgoli, B.: Multi objective association rule mining with genetic algorithm without specifying minimum support and minimum confidence. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(1), 288–298 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yan, X., Zhang, C., Zhang, S.: Genetic algorithm-based strategy for identifying association rules without specifying actual minimum support. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(2), 3066–3076 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kabir, M.M.J., Xu, S., Kang, B.H., Zhao, Z.: Comparative analysis of genetic based approach and apriori algorithm for mining maximal frequent item sets. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 39–45 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin, D., Rosete, A., Alcala-Fdez, J., Herrera, F.: A new multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for mining a reduced set of interesting positive and negative quantitative association rules. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18(1), 54–69 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kabir, M.M.J., Xu, S., Kang, B.H., Zhao, Z.: A new evolutionary algorithm for extracting a reduced set of interesting association rules. In: Arik, S., Huang, T., Lai, W.K., Liu, Q. (eds.) ICONIP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9490, pp. 133–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-26535-3_16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shenoy, P., Srinivasa, K., Venugopal, K., Patnaik, L.: Dynamic association rule mining using genetic algorithms. Intell. Data Anal. 9(5), 439–453 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maaranen, H., Miettinen, K., Penttinen, A.: On initial populations of a genetic algorithm for continuous optimization problems. J. Glob. Optim. 37(3), 405–436 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maaranen, H., Miettinen, K., Mäkelä, M.M.: Quasi-random initial population for genetic algorithms. Comput. Math. Appl. 47(12), 1885–1895 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chang, P.C., Huang, W.H., Ting, C.J.: Dynamic diversity control in genetic algorithm for mining unsearched solution space in TSP problems. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(3), 1863–1878 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mir Md. Jahangir Kabir
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shuxiang Xu
    • 1
  • Byeong Ho Kang
    • 1
  • Zongyuan Zhao
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Engineering and ICTUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations