Advertisement

The Qualitative Characteristics of Combining Evidence with Discounting

  • Alexander Lepskiy
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 456)

Abstract

The qualitative characteristics of the combining evidence with the help of Dempster’s rule with discounting is studied in this paper in the framework of Dempster-Shafer theory. The discount coefficient (discounting rate) characterizes the reliability of information source. The conflict between evidence and change of ignorance after applying combining rule are considered in this paper as important characteristics of quality of combining. The quantity of ignorance is estimated with the help of linear imprecision index. The set of crisp and fuzzy discounting rates for which the value of ignorance after combining does not increases is described.

Keywords

Belief functions Discount method Imprecise index 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The financial support from the Government of the Russian Federation within the framework of the implementation o f the 5–100 Programme Roadmap of the National Research University Higher School of Economics is acknowledged. This work was supported by the grant 14-07-00189 of RFBR (Russian Foundation for Basic Research).

References

  1. 1.
    Adamo JM (1980) Fuzzy decision trees. Fuzzy Sets Syst 4:207–219MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bronevich A, Lepskiy A (2015) Imprecision indices: axiomatic, properties and applications. Int J Gen Syst 44(7–8):812–832MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bronevich A, Rozenberg I (2015) The choice of generalized dempstershafer rules for aggregating belief functions. Int J Approximate Reasoning 56-A:122–136Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dempster AP (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann Math Stat 38(2):325–339MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dubois D, Prade H (1985) A note on measures of specificity for fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 10:279–283MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dubois D, Prade H (1986) A set-theoretic view of belief functions logical operations and approximation by fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 12(3):193–226MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lepskiy A (2013) About relation between the measure of conflict and decreasing of ignorance in theory of evidence. In: Proceedings of the 8th conference of the European society for fuzzy logic and technology. Atlantis Press, Amsterdam, pp 355–362Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lepskiy A (2014) General schemes of combining rules and the quality characteristics of combining. In: BELIEF 2014, LNAI 8764. Springer, pp 29–38Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pichon F, Denoeux T (2009) Interpretation and computation of alpha-junctions for combining belief functions. In: 6th international symposium on imprecise probability: theories and applications (ISIPTA ’09), Durham, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sentz K, Ferson S (2002) Combination of evidence in dempster-shafer theory. In: Report SAND 2002-0835, Sandia Nat LaborGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, PrincetonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smets Ph (1995) The canonical decomposition of weighted belief. In: International joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp 1896–1901Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations