Advertisement

Towards Ontology Guided Translation of Activity-Centric Processes to GSM

  • Julius KöpkeEmail author
  • Jianwen Su
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 256)

Abstract

There exist two major modeling paradigms for business process modeling: The predominant activity centric one and the artifact centric paradigm. Both are suitable for modeling and for executing business processes. However, process models are typically designed from different perspectives. Current translation methods operate on the syntactic level, preserving the point of view of the source process. The results of such translations are not particularly useful, understandable and insightful for stakeholders. In this paper we motivate the need for ontology-guided translations by comparing the results of a purely syntactic translation with a manual translation. We discuss shortcomings of the generated solutions and propose an ontology-based framework and sketch corresponding translation method for the generation of semantic translations, which allow to incorporate the point of view of the target modeling paradigm.

Keywords

Process translation Artifact centric BPM Guard Stage Milestone GSM Semantic process abstraction 

References

  1. 1.
    Organizing Business Knowledge: The MIT Process Handbook, vol. 1. The MIT Press, 1st edn. (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boaz, D., Heath, T., Gupta, M., et al.: The ACSI hub: A data-centric environment for service interoperation. In: BPM 2014 Demos, p. 11, Septemper 2014Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Born, M., Dörr, F., Weber, I.: User-friendly semantic annotation in business process modeling. In: Weske, M., Hacid, M.-S., Godart, C. (eds.) WISE Workshops 2007. LNCS, vol. 4832, pp. 260–271. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Damaggio, E., Hull, R., Vaculín, R.: On the equivalence of incremental and fixpoint semantics for business artifacts with guard-stage-milestone lifecycles. Inf. Syst. 38(4), 561–584 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Masellis, R., Lembo, D., Montali, M., Solomakhin, D.: Semantic enrichment of gsm-based artifact-centric models. J. Data Semant. 4(1), 3–27 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eder, J., Kerschbaumer, N., Köpke, J., et al.: View-based interorganizational workflows. In: Proceedings of CompSysTech 2011, Vienna, pp. 1–10 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eshuis, R., Norta, A., Kopp, O., Pitkanen, E.: Service outsourcing with process views. IEEE T. Serv. Comput. 8(1), 136–154 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eshuis, R., Van Gorp, P.: Synthesizing data-centric models from business process models. Computing 98, 1–29 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gemino, A., Wand, Y.: A framework for empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques. Requirements Eng. 9(4), 248–260 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Günther, C.W., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Fuzzy mining – adaptive process simplification based on multi-perspective metrics. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 328–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hinge, K., Ghose, A., Koliadis, G.: A tool for semantic effect annotation of business process models. In: IEEE EDOC CONF 2009, pp. 55–63 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hull, R., Damaggio, E., De Masellis, R., et al.: Business artifacts with guard-stage-milestone lifecycles: managing artifact interactions with conditions and events. In: Proceedings of DEBS 2011, pp. 51–62. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Köpke, J., Eder, J.: Semantic annotation of XML-schema for document transformations. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6428, pp. 219–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Köpke, J., Eder, J., Künstner, M.: Top-down design of collaborating processes. In: Proceedings of IIWAS 2014, pp. 336–345 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumaran, S., Liu, R., Wu, F.Y.: On the duality of information-centric and activity-centric models of business processes. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 32–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mafazi, S., Grossmann, G., Mayer, W., Schrefl, M., Stumptner, M.: Consistent abstraction of business processes based on constraints. JoDS 4(1), 59–78 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meyer, A., Weske, M.: Activity-centric and artifact-centric process model roundtrip. BPM Workshops, LNBIP 171, 167–181 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moody, D.L.: Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data Knowl. Eng. 55(3), 243–276 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    W3C OWL Working Group. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Document Overview. W3C Recommendation, 27 October 2009Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Popova, V., Dumas, M.: From petri nets to guard-stage-milestone models. BPM Workshops, LNBIP 132, 340–351 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Popova, V., Fahland, D., Dumas, M.: Artifact lifecycle discovery. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 24(01), 1550001 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Santiputri, M., Ghose, A.K., Dam, H.K., Wen, X.: Mining process task post-conditions. In: Johannesson, P., et al. (eds.) ER 2015. LNCS, vol. 9381, pp. 514–527. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smirnov, S., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Meronymy-based aggregation of activities in business process models. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smirnov, S., Reijers, H.A., Weske, M., et al.: Business process model abstraction: a definition, catalog, and survey. Distrib. Parallel DAT 30(1), 63–99 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUC Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Alpen-Adria UniversitätKlagenfurtAustria

Personalised recommendations