Advances in Energy Systems Engineering pp 601-620 | Cite as

# Integrating Energy Optimization and Production Scheduling in Energy-Intensive Industries

## Abstract

The share of volatile renewable energy generation is rapidly increasing in many countries around the world. As in electric power grids the supply always needs to equal the demand, the increasing volatility of energy supply imposes a major challenge to the stability of power grids. Demand response actions offer a very cost-efficient way to cope with this challenge. Especially energy-intensive industries such as metals, cement or pulp and paper offer a high potential to adjust their energy consumption towards the power grid in the form of large controllable loads. In this chapter we look into how this potential could be used without affecting the production volume. Advanced scheduling algorithms allow to efficiently plan the production at industrial sites. Enabling such scheduling algorithms for energy-aware production planning as well as the integration of scheduling and energy optimization solutions allows to leverage a high potential for shifting energy consumption from times with low to times with high renewable energy generation. In addition, this approach allows plant owners to significantly reduce their energy cost.

## Keywords

Energy Management Electricity Price Production Schedule Master Problem Primal Decomposition## References

- Ait-Ali, A. (2015). Integration of production scheduling and energy management. Master’s thesis, KTH Stockholm. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-160136.
- Baboli, P. T., Moghaddam, M. P., & Eghbal, M. (2011). Present status and future trends in enabling demand response programs.
*IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting,*1–6.Google Scholar - Baldea, M., & Harjunkoski, I. (2014). Integrated production scheduling and process control: A systematic review.
*Computers and Chemical Engineering,**71*, 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Benders, J. F. (1962). Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems.
*Numerische Mathematik,**4*, 238–252.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - Castro, P. M., Harjunkoski, I., & Grossmann, I. E. (2011). Optimal scheduling of continuous plants with energy constraints.
*Computers and Chemical Engineering,**35*, 372–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Castro, P., Sun, L., & Harjunkoski, I. (2013). Resource-task network formulations for industrial demand side management of a steel plant.
*Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research,**52*(36), 13046–13058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Charles River Associates. (2005). Primer on demand-side management with an emphasis on price-responsive programs. Prepared for The World Bank.Google Scholar
- Chu, Y., & You, F. (2012). Integration of scheduling and control with online closed-loop implementation: fast computational strategy and large-scale global optimization algorithm.
*Computers and Chemical Engineering,**47*, 248–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Conti, J., & Holtberg, P. (2011). International energy outlook 2011. US Energy Information Administration.Google Scholar
- Engell, S., & Harjunkoski, I. (2012). Optimal operation: scheduling, advanced control and their integration.
*Computers and Chemical Engineering,**47*, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - European Union. (2011). Energy 2020. A strategy for competitive sustainable and secure energy.Google Scholar
- Fernández, I., Renedo, C. J., Pérez, S. F., Ortiz, A., & Ma˜nana, M. (2012). A review: energy recovery inbatch processes.
*Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,**16*(4), 2260–2277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Floudas, C. A., & Lin, X. (2004). Continuous-time versus discrete-time approaches for scheduling of chemical processes: a review.
*Computers and Chemical Engineering,**28*, 2109–2129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gahm, C., Denz, F., Dirr, M., & Tuma, A. (2016). Energy-efficient scheduling in manufacturing companies: A review and research framework.
*European Journal of Operational Research,**248*(3), 744–757.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - Georgiadis, M. C., & Papageorgiou, L. G. (2001). Optimal scheduling of heat-integrated multipurpose plants under fouling conditions.
*Applied Thermal Engineering,**21*(16), 1675–1697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hadera, H., Harjunkoski, I., Sand, G., Grossmann, I. E., & Engell, S. (2015). Optimization of steel production scheduling with complex time-sensitive electricity cost.
*Computers and Chemical Engineering,**76*, 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Halim, I., & Srinivasan, R. (2009). Sequential methodology for scheduling of heat-integrated batch plants.
*Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research,**48*(18), 8551–8565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Harjunkoski, I., Maravelias, C. T., Bongers, P., Castro, P. M., Engell, S., Grossmann, I. E., et al. (2014). Scope for industrial applications of production scheduling models and solution methods.
*Computers and Chemical Engineering,**62*, 161–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Holmberg, K. (1992). Linear mean value cross decomposition: A generalization of the Kornai-Liptak method.
*European Journal of Operational Research,**62*, 55–73.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - Holmberg, K. (1994). A convergence proof for linear mean value cross decomposition.
*ZOR—Methods and Models of Operations Research,**39*, 157–186.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar - Holmberg, K., & Kiwiel, K. C. (2006). Mean value cross decomposition for nonlinear convex problems.
*Optimization Methods and Software,**21*(3), 401–417.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - Kondili, E., Pantelides, C. C., & Sargent, W. H. (1993). A general algorithm for short-term scheduling of batch operations—IMILP formulation.
*Computers and Chemical Engineering,**2*, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Merkert, L., Harjunkoski, I., Isaksson, A., Säynevirta, S., Saarela, A., & Sand, G. (2015). Scheduling and energy—industrial challenges and opportunities.
*Computers and Chemical Engineering,**72*, 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Olsen, D., Goli, S., & McKane, A. (2012). Examining synergies between energy management and demand response: A case study at two California industrial facilities. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.Google Scholar
- Pantelides, C. C. (1994). Unified frameworks for optimal process planning and scheduling. IN
*Foundations of computer-aided process operations*(pp. 253–274). New York: CACHE Publications.Google Scholar - Pinedo, M., & Chao, X. (1999).
*Operations scheduling with applications in manufacturing and services*. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-289779-1.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - Ribas, I., Leisten, R., & Framiñan, J. M. (2010). Review and classification of hybrid flowshop scheduling problems from a production system and a solutions procedure perspective.
*Computers and Operations Research,**37*(8), 1439–1454.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - Roy, V. T. J. (1983). Cross decomposition for mixed integer programming.
*Mathematical Programming,**25*, 46–63.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - Seid, E. R., & Majozi, T. (2014). Optimization of energy and water use in multipurpose batch plants using an improved mathematical formulation.
*Chemical Engineering Science,**111*, 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Todd, D. (2011). Alcoa—dynamic demand response DOE workshop—10/25–10/26. In
*Presented at 2011 Department of Energy Load Participation in Ancillary Services Workshop*, Washington, D.C. October 2011. https://www1.eere.energy.gov/analysis/pdfs/alcoa_dewayne_todd.pdf. - Wolfe, P., & Dantzig, G. B. (1960). Decomposition principle for linear programs.
*Operations Research,*101–111.Google Scholar - Zhuge, J., & Ierapetritou, M. G. (2012). Integration of scheduling and control with closed loop implementation.
*Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research,**51*(25), 8550–8565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar