Integrating Energy Optimization and Production Scheduling in Energy-Intensive Industries

  • Lennart Merkert
  • Iiro HarjunkoskiEmail author


The share of volatile renewable energy generation is rapidly increasing in many countries around the world. As in electric power grids the supply always needs to equal the demand, the increasing volatility of energy supply imposes a major challenge to the stability of power grids. Demand response actions offer a very cost-efficient way to cope with this challenge. Especially energy-intensive industries such as metals, cement or pulp and paper offer a high potential to adjust their energy consumption towards the power grid in the form of large controllable loads. In this chapter we look into how this potential could be used without affecting the production volume. Advanced scheduling algorithms allow to efficiently plan the production at industrial sites. Enabling such scheduling algorithms for energy-aware production planning as well as the integration of scheduling and energy optimization solutions allows to leverage a high potential for shifting energy consumption from times with low to times with high renewable energy generation. In addition, this approach allows plant owners to significantly reduce their energy cost.


Energy Management Electricity Price Production Schedule Master Problem Primal Decomposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ait-Ali, A. (2015). Integration of production scheduling and energy management. Master’s thesis, KTH Stockholm.
  2. Baboli, P. T., Moghaddam, M. P., & Eghbal, M. (2011). Present status and future trends in enabling demand response programs. IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 1–6.Google Scholar
  3. Baldea, M., & Harjunkoski, I. (2014). Integrated production scheduling and process control: A systematic review. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 71, 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benders, J. F. (1962). Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems. Numerische Mathematik, 4, 238–252.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Castro, P. M., Harjunkoski, I., & Grossmann, I. E. (2011). Optimal scheduling of continuous plants with energy constraints. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 35, 372–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castro, P., Sun, L., & Harjunkoski, I. (2013). Resource-task network formulations for industrial demand side management of a steel plant. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(36), 13046–13058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charles River Associates. (2005). Primer on demand-side management with an emphasis on price-responsive programs. Prepared for The World Bank.Google Scholar
  8. Chu, Y., & You, F. (2012). Integration of scheduling and control with online closed-loop implementation: fast computational strategy and large-scale global optimization algorithm. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 47, 248–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conti, J., & Holtberg, P. (2011). International energy outlook 2011. US Energy Information Administration.Google Scholar
  10. Engell, S., & Harjunkoski, I. (2012). Optimal operation: scheduling, advanced control and their integration. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 47, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. European Union. (2011). Energy 2020. A strategy for competitive sustainable and secure energy.Google Scholar
  12. Fernández, I., Renedo, C. J., Pérez, S. F., Ortiz, A., & Ma˜nana, M. (2012). A review: energy recovery inbatch processes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(4), 2260–2277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Floudas, C. A., & Lin, X. (2004). Continuous-time versus discrete-time approaches for scheduling of chemical processes: a review. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 28, 2109–2129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gahm, C., Denz, F., Dirr, M., & Tuma, A. (2016). Energy-efficient scheduling in manufacturing companies: A review and research framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(3), 744–757.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Georgiadis, M. C., & Papageorgiou, L. G. (2001). Optimal scheduling of heat-integrated multipurpose plants under fouling conditions. Applied Thermal Engineering, 21(16), 1675–1697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hadera, H., Harjunkoski, I., Sand, G., Grossmann, I. E., & Engell, S. (2015). Optimization of steel production scheduling with complex time-sensitive electricity cost. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 76, 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halim, I., & Srinivasan, R. (2009). Sequential methodology for scheduling of heat-integrated batch plants. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 48(18), 8551–8565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harjunkoski, I., Maravelias, C. T., Bongers, P., Castro, P. M., Engell, S., Grossmann, I. E., et al. (2014). Scope for industrial applications of production scheduling models and solution methods. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 62, 161–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holmberg, K. (1992). Linear mean value cross decomposition: A generalization of the Kornai-Liptak method. European Journal of Operational Research, 62, 55–73.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Holmberg, K. (1994). A convergence proof for linear mean value cross decomposition. ZOR—Methods and Models of Operations Research, 39, 157–186.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Holmberg, K., & Kiwiel, K. C. (2006). Mean value cross decomposition for nonlinear convex problems. Optimization Methods and Software, 21(3), 401–417.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Kondili, E., Pantelides, C. C., & Sargent, W. H. (1993). A general algorithm for short-term scheduling of batch operations—IMILP formulation. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Merkert, L., Harjunkoski, I., Isaksson, A., Säynevirta, S., Saarela, A., & Sand, G. (2015). Scheduling and energy—industrial challenges and opportunities. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 72, 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Olsen, D., Goli, S., & McKane, A. (2012). Examining synergies between energy management and demand response: A case study at two California industrial facilities. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  25. Pantelides, C. C. (1994). Unified frameworks for optimal process planning and scheduling. IN Foundations of computer-aided process operations (pp. 253–274). New York: CACHE Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Pinedo, M., & Chao, X. (1999). Operations scheduling with applications in manufacturing and services. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-289779-1.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Ribas, I., Leisten, R., & Framiñan, J. M. (2010). Review and classification of hybrid flowshop scheduling problems from a production system and a solutions procedure perspective. Computers and Operations Research, 37(8), 1439–1454.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Roy, V. T. J. (1983). Cross decomposition for mixed integer programming. Mathematical Programming, 25, 46–63.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Seid, E. R., & Majozi, T. (2014). Optimization of energy and water use in multipurpose batch plants using an improved mathematical formulation. Chemical Engineering Science, 111, 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Todd, D. (2011). Alcoa—dynamic demand response DOE workshop—10/25–10/26. In Presented at 2011 Department of Energy Load Participation in Ancillary Services Workshop, Washington, D.C. October 2011.
  31. Wolfe, P., & Dantzig, G. B. (1960). Decomposition principle for linear programs. Operations Research, 101–111.Google Scholar
  32. Zhuge, J., & Ierapetritou, M. G. (2012). Integration of scheduling and control with closed loop implementation. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 51(25), 8550–8565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ABB AG Corporate ResearchLadenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations