A Novel Approach for Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke Patients
Abstract
This paper presents a novel neuro-rehabilitation system for recovery of arm and hand motor functions involved in reaching and grasping. The system provides arm weight support and robotic assistance of the hand closing/opening within specific exercises in virtual reality. A user interface allows the clinicians to perform an easy parametrization of the virtual scenario, customizing the exercises and the robotic assistance to the needs of the patient and encouraging training of the hand with proper recruitment of the residual motor functions. Feasibility of the proposed rehabilitation system was evaluated through an experimental rehabilitation session, conducted by clinicians with 4 healthy participants and 2 stroke patients. All subjects were able to perform the proposed exercises with parameters adapted to their specific motor capabilities. All patients were able to use the proposed system and to accomplishing the rehabilitation tasks following the suggestion of the clinicians. The effectiveness of the proposed neuro-rehabilitation will be evaluated in an imminent prolonged clinical study involving more stroke patients.
Keywords
Robotic rehabilitation Stroke Virtual reality Exoskeleton Neurorheabilitation Haptic feedbackNotes
Acknowledgements
This work has been partially funded from the EU Horizon2020 project n. 644839 CENTAURO and by the WEARHAP project funded by EU within the 7th framework program.
References
- 1.World Medical Association: World medical association declaration of helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310(20), 2191–2194 (2013)Google Scholar
- 2.Barreca, S., Wolf, S.L., Fasoli, S., Bohannon, R.: Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: a critical review. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair 17(4), 220–226 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Barsotti, M., Leonardis, D., Loconsole, C., Solazzi, M., Sotgiu, E., Procopio, C., Chisari, C., Bergamasco, M., Frisoli, A.: A full upper limb robotic exoskeleton for reaching and grasping rehabilitation triggered by mi-bci. In: IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), pp. 49–54. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
- 4.Chen, G., Zhang, S.: Fully-compliant statically-balanced mechanisms without prestressing assembly: concepts and case studies. Mech. Sci. 2, 169–174 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Comani, S., Velluto, L., Schinaia, L., Cerroni, G., Serio, A., Buzzelli, S., Sorbi, S., Guarnieri, B.: Monitoring neuro-motor recovery from stroke with high-resolution eeg, robotics and virtual reality: a proof of concept. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 23(6), 1106–1116 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Dipietro, L., Krebs, H.I., Fasoli, S.E., Volpe, B.T., Stein, J., Bever, C., Hogan, N.: Changing motor synergies in chronic stroke. J. Neurophysiol. 98, 757–768 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Frisoli, A., Procopio, C., Chisari, C., Creatini, I., Bonfiglio, L., Bergamasco, M., Rossi, B., Carboncini, M.: Positive effects of robotic exoskeleton training of upper limb reaching movements after stroke. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. (2012)Google Scholar
- 8.Hesse, S., Mehrholz, J., Werner, C.: Robot-assisted upper and lower limb rehabilitation after stroke. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT-KOLN- 105(18), 330 (2008)Google Scholar
- 9.Krabben, T., Molier, B.I., Houwink, A., Rietman, J.S., Buurke, J.H., Prange, G.B.: Circle drawing as evaluative movement task in stroke rehabilitation: an explorative study. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 8(1), 1–11 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Lenzo, B., Fontana, M., Marcheschi, S., Salsedo, F., Frisoli, A., Bergamasco, M.: Trackhold: a novel passive arm-support device. J. Mech. Robot. 8(2) (2015). http://www.wearable-robotics.com
- 11.Leonardis, D., Barsotti, M., Loconsole, C., Solazzi, M., Troncossi, M., Mazzotti, C., Castelli, V., Procopio, C., Lamola, G., Chisari, C., Bergamasco, M., Frisoli, A.: An emg-controlled robotic hand exoskeleton for bilateral rehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Haptics 8(2), 140–151 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Mehrholz, J., Platz, T., Kugler, J., Pohl, M.: Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. Stroke 40(5), e392–e393 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Montagner, A., Frisoli, A., Borelli, L., Procopio, C., Bergamasco, M., Carboncini, M., Rossi, B.: A pilot clinical study on robotic assisted rehabilitation in vr with an arm exoskeleton device. In: Virtual Rehabilitation 2007, pp. 57–64 (2007)Google Scholar
- 14.Muellbacher, W., Richards, C., Ziemann, U., Wittenberg, G., Weltz, D., Boroojerdi, B., Cohen, L., Hallett, M.: Improving hand function in chronic stroke. Arch. Neurol. 59(8), 1278–1282 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Nykanen, K.: The effectiveness of robot-aided upper limb therapy in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of randomized controlled studies. Master’s thesis, University of Jyvskyl, Institute of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy (2010)Google Scholar
- 16.Oliveira, L.F., Simpson, D.M., Nadal, J.: Calculation of area of stabilometric signals using principal component analysis. Physiol. Meas. 17(4), 305 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Whitall, J., Waller, S.M., Silver, K.H.C., Macko, R.F.: Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 31(10), 2390–2395 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar