Tactile Apparent Movement as a Modality for Lower Limb Haptic Feedback

  • Daniel K. Y. Chen
  • Junkai Xu
  • Peter B. Shull
  • Thor F. Besier
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9775)

Abstract

Wearable haptic technology has been shown to be effective for motion training and rehabilitation. However, one challenge is providing multiple intuitive tactile feedback during walking and hence new feedback methods need to be explored. Experiments were conducted to explore the use of tactile apparent movement on the lower extremity and its feasibility as a feedback modality. Optimal stimulus duration and inter-stimulus onset interval (ISOI) combinations were determined. We obtained the optimal mean ISOIs at six different stimulus durations (from 100–200 ms) and then measured the subjects’ left and right perception accuracy and response times when those stimuli were presented in a randomized trial during standing and walking. This study shows that apparent movement can be an effective feedback modality during walking achieving accuracies of ~100 % and low response times of <1010 ms, given the optimal stimulus.

Keywords

Tactile apparent movement Lower limb haptic feedback Phi illusion Gait retraining 

References

  1. 1.
    Kapur, P., Jensen, M., Buxbaum, L.J., Jax, S., Kuchenbecker, K.J.: Spatially distributed tactile feedback for kinesthetic motion guidance, pp. 519–526 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bark, K., Wheeler, J.W., Premakumar, S., Cutkosky, M.R.: Comparison of skin stretch and vibrotactile stimulation for feedback of proprioceptive information, pp. 71–78 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dachille IX, F., Qin, H., Kaufman, A.: A novel haptics-based interface and sculpting system for physics-based geometric design. Comput. Aided Des. 33, 403–420 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fregly, B.J., Reinbolt, J.A., Rooney, K.L., Mitchell, K.H., Chmielewski, T.L.: Design of patient-specific gait modifications for knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54, 1687–1695 (2007). doi:10.1109/TBME.2007.891934 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, D., Anderson, I., Walker, C., Besier, T.: Lower extremity lateral skin stretch perception for haptic feedback. IEEE Trans. Haptics 9(1), 62–68 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lurie, K.L., Shull, P.B., Nesbitt, K.F., Cutkosky, M.R.: Informing haptic feedback design for gait retraining. In: 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC), pp. 19–24 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sherrick, C.E., Rogers, R.: Apparent haptic movement. Percept. Psychophysics 1, 175–180 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burtt, H.E.: Tactual illusions of movement. J. Exp. Psychol. 2, 371 (1917)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kirman, J.H.: Tactile apparent movement: the effects of interstimulus onset interval and stimulus duration. Percept. Psychophysics 15, 1–6 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kirman, J.H.: Tactile apparent movement: the effects of number of stimulators. J. Exp. Psychol. 103, 1175 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murata, A., Kemori, S., Moriwaka, M., Hayami, T.: Proposal of automotive 8-directional warning system that makes use of tactile apparent movement. In: Duffy, V.G. (ed.) HCII 2013 and DHM 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8025, pp. 98–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Israr, A., Poupyrev, I.: Tactile brush: drawing on skin with a tactile grid display, pp. 2019–2028 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huisman, G., Darriba Frederiks, A., Van Dijk, B., Hevlen, D., Krose, B.: The TaSST: tactile sleeve for social touch, pp. 211–216 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ueda, S., Uchida, M., Nozawa, A., Ide, H.: A tactile display used phantom sensation with apparent movement together. IEEJ Trans. Fundam. Mater. 127, 277–284 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van Erp, J.B., Van Veen, H.: A multi-purpose tactile vest for astronauts in the international space station, pp. 405–408 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Craig, J.C.: Tactile pattern perception and its perturbations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 238–246 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel K. Y. Chen
    • 1
  • Junkai Xu
    • 2
  • Peter B. Shull
    • 2
  • Thor F. Besier
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Auckland Bioengineering Institute (*Biomimetics Lab)University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Department of Engineering ScienceUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations