Hunter-Gatherers and Fishing Rights in Alaska and Siberia: Contemporary Governmentality, Subsistence, and Sustainable Enterprises

Chapter

Abstract

This paper examines processes by which Alaskan and Siberian indigenous peoples have been rendered as political subjects, “traditional” hunters-gathers, and sustainable enterprise owners amid their respective colonial and post-colonial industrial economies. The comparison is instructive because, despite being part of diametrically opposed (Soviet versus USA) national political organizations, policies and the exercise of biopower towards indigenous peoples have proceeded along similar lines. In the post-colonial era, these lines have converged around neoliberal and social development policies which support indigenous “self-determination” through minimal subsistence rights and the creation of ethnic enterprises and partnerships with non-indigenous capitalist corporations. On both sides of the North Pacific, however, this transition has come about without formal recognition of the well-developed systems of aboriginal marine tenure and fishing rights, as has been the case in other indigenous-state Treaty regimes (e.g., Canada and New Zealand). The lack of such protections, we argue, has led to poor management of coastal zones as social-ecological systems, making sustainable indigenous livelihoods and small enterprises based on marine resources difficult to develop or maintain. We examine, in particular, the relationship of Sakhalin and Southeast Alaska indigenous hunter-fishers as strong, independent peoples whose salmon fishing rights were usurped and their corporate groups reorganized to fit notions of modern industrial and neoliberal social-economic organization. Further, we argue for more synergistic policies between indigenous subsistence and commercial economies to reduce ‘black market’ transactions and conserve valuable fishing knowledge, skills, and cultural practices which are vital to heritage, livelihoods, and wellbeing.

References

  1. ADF&G. (2015). CSIS (Community subsistence information system). Anchorage, Alaska: Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Subsistence.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ames, K. M. (2003). The Northwest Coast. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 12(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold, D. F. (2009). The fishermen’s frontier: People and salmon in Southeast Alaska. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred ecology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Betts, M. F., & Wolfe, R. J. (1992). Commercialization of fisheries and the subsistence economies of the Alaska Tlingit. Society & Natural Resources, 5(3), 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colombi, B. J., & Brooks, J. F. (Eds.). (2012). Keystone nations: Indigenous peoples and salmon across the North Pacific. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
  8. Donahoe, B. (2014). Naming, claiming, proving? The burden of the proof issue for Russia’s indigenous peoples. In J. Eckert, B. Donahoe, C. Strümpell, & Z. Ö. Biner (Eds.), Law against the state: Ethnographic forays into law’s transformations (pp. 44–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Emmons, G. T., & De Laguna, F. (1991). The Tlingit Indians (Vol. 70). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fall, J. A. (2012). Subsistence in Alaska: A year 2010 update. Anchorage, Alaska: Division of Subsistence, Alaska Department of Fish and Game.Google Scholar
  11. Fall, J., & Walker, R. J. (1993). Subsistence harvests in six Kodiak Island Borough communities. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Subsistence, Technical Paper No. 193, Juneau, AK.Google Scholar
  12. Fondahl, G. A. (1997). Freezing the frontier: Territories of traditional nature use in Northern Russia. Progress in Planning, 47(4), 307–319.Google Scholar
  13. Fondahl, G. A. (1998). Gaining ground? Evenkis, land and reform in Southeastern Siberia. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, Vol. I: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  15. Funk, D., & Zenko, A. (2008). Nivkh, interviews conducted and summarized by D. Funk and A. Zenko. In L. Sillanpää (Ed.), Awakening Siberia. From marginalization to self-determination: The small indigenous nations of Northern Russia on the eve of the millennium (pp. 416–439). Acta Politica No. 33. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  16. Garibaldi, A., & Turner, N. (2004). Cultural keystone species: Implications for ecological conservation and restoration. Ecology and Society, 9(3), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gerkey, D. (2011). Abandoning fish: The vulnerability of salmon as a cultural resource in a post-Soviet commons. Anthropology of Work Review, 32(2), 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilberthorpe, E., & Hilson, G. (Eds.). (2014). Natural resource extraction and indigenous livelihoods: Development challenges in an era of globalization. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Grant, B. (1996). In the Soviet house of culture: A century of perestroikas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hancock, N. (2002). Is trade traditional? Theorizing economic histories and futures in the New Kamchatka. In E. Kasten (Ed.), People and the land: Pathways to reform in post-Soviet Siberia (pp. 225–243). Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haycox, S. W. (2002). Alaska: An American colony. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  23. Holen, D. (2013). Fishing for community and culture: The value of fisheries in rural Alaska. Polar Record, 50(4), 403–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holen, D. (2015). The entangled lives of salmon and people: Fishery dependent communities in rural Alaska. Manuscript in the author’s possession. Anchorage, AK.Google Scholar
  25. Langdon, S. J. (1980). Transfer Patterns in Alaskan Limited Entry Fisheries. Final report for the Limited Entry Study Group of the Alaska State Legislature. January 17, 1980.Google Scholar
  26. Langdon, S. J. (1989). From communal property to common property to limited entry: Historical ironies in the management of Southeast Alaska salmon. In J. Cordell (Ed.), A sea of small boats (pp. 304–332). Cambridge, MA: Cultural Survival Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Langdon, S. J. (2008). The community quota program in the Gulf of Alaska: A vehicle for Alaska native village sustainability. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 68, 155–194.Google Scholar
  28. Langdon, S. J. (2015a). Foregone harvests and neoliberal policies: Creating opportunities for rural, small-scale, community-based fisheries in southern Alaskan coastal villages. Marine Policy, 61, 347–355.Google Scholar
  29. Langdon, S. J. (2015b). Food transactions involving money among hunters and gatherers. Paper presented at the XI Conference of Hunting and Gathering Societies (CHAGS), Vienna, Austria. 9 September.Google Scholar
  30. Mamontova, N. (2012). Traditsionnaya ekonomika nivkhov Sakhalina: mezhdu ustoychivostyu i razvitiem (Traditional economy of the Sakhalin Nivkh: Between sustainability and development). Ethnographicheskoe obozrenie, 1, 133–150.Google Scholar
  31. Mamontova, N. (2015). Korennye narody Sakhalina i neftedobyvayushchie kompanii (The indigenous peoples of Sakhalin and oil companies). In D. A. Funk (Ed.), Kultura i resursy: Opyt ethnologisheskogo obsledovaniya sovremennogo polozheniya narodov Severa Sakhalina (pp. 108–158). Moscow: Demos.Google Scholar
  32. Messhtyb, N. (2009). Aspects of the livelihoods of the peoples of the Lower Amur under current market conditions. In H. Beach, D. Funk, & L. Sillanpää (Eds.), Post-Soviet transformations: Politics of ethnicity and resource use in Russia (pp. 33–48). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
  33. Metcalfe, P. (2014). A dangerous idea: The Alaska Native Brotherhood and the struggle for indigenous rights. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mitchell, D. C. (1997). Sold American: The story of Alaska natives and their land, 1867–1959: The army to statehood. Hanover: Dartmouth Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  35. Murashko, O. (2006). Zemelnye prava korennykh malochislennykh narodov (land use rights of the indigenous small-numbered peoples). In O. Murashko (Ed.), Ethnologicheskaya ekspertiza v Rossii i mezhdunarodnye standarty otsenki vozdeystviya proektov na korennye narody (pp. 9–11). Moscow: Assotsiatsiya korennyh malochislennyh narodov Severa, Sibiri i Dalnego Vostoka.Google Scholar
  36. Nuttall, M., Berkes, F., Forbes, B., Kofinas, G., Vlassova, T., & Wenzel, G. (2005). Hunting, herding, fishing and gathering: Indigenous peoples and renewable resource use in the Arctic. In C. Symon, L. Arris, & B. Heal (Eds.), Arctic climate impact assessment—Scientific report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ostrom, E., & Walker, J. (Eds.). (2003). Trust and reciprocity: Interdisciplinary lessons for experimental research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Pika, A. (1999). Neotraditionalism in the Russian North: Indigenous peoples and the legacy of perestroika. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  39. Povinelli, E. A. (2002). The cunning of recognition: Indigenous alterities and the making of Australian multiculturalism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Robbins, P. (2011). Political ecology: A critical introduction. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  41. Roon, T. (2006). Globalization of Sakhalin’s oil industry: Partnership or conflict? A reflection on the Etnologicheskaia Ekspertiza. Sibirica, 2(5), 95–114.Google Scholar
  42. Roon, T. (2010). The Uilta of Sakhalin: A historical and ethnographic study of the traditional economy and material culture of the 18th—20th centuries. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk: Sakhalin Regional Museum.Google Scholar
  43. Rutland, P. (2010). The presence of absence: Ethnicity policy in Russia. In J. Newton & W. Thompson (Eds.), Institutions, ideas and leadership in Russian politics (pp. 116–136). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sasaki, S. (1998). The trade activity of the peoples of the Lower Amur basin in the 18th and 19th centuries. Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology, 22(4), 683–686.Google Scholar
  45. Schroeder, R. F., & Kookesh, M. A. (1990). Subsistence harvest and use of fish and wildlife resources and the effects of forest management in Hoonah, Alaska. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Subsistence, Technical Paper No.173. Juneau, AK.Google Scholar
  46. Scott, J. C. (2009). The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Slezkine, Y. (1994). Arctic mirrors: Russia and the small peoples of the North. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Smolyak, A. (1975). Ethnicheskie protsessy u narodov Nizhnego Amura i Sakhalina. Seredina XIX—nachalo XX v. (Ethnic processes among the native peoples of the Lower Amur and Sakhalin in the middle of the 19th—in the early 20th century). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
  49. Social Indicators. (2012). Social and health indicators of the indigenous peoples of Northern Sakhalin (the data received from the Administration of the Poronaysk District in 2013).Google Scholar
  50. Sokolovskiy, S. V. (2008). Korennye narody: mezhdu integratsiey i sohraneniem kultur (Indigenous peoples: Between integration and cultural preservation). In E. I. Filippova (Ed.), Ethnicheskie kategorii i statistika: Debaty v Rossii i Frantsii (pp. 49–70). Moscow: FGNU “Rosinformagroteh”.Google Scholar
  51. SHASR (State Historical Archive of the Sakhalin Region), fund 1198, inventory list 1, case 188: Correspondence concerning the provision of assistance to the indigenous peoples of the North (1994).Google Scholar
  52. Suttles, W., & Sturtevant, W. C. (Eds.). (1990). Handbook of North American Indians (Vol. 7). Northwest Coast: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  53. Thornton, T. F. (2008). Being and place among the Tlingit. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  54. Thornton, T. F. (2015a). Place as education’s source. In S. Kan (Ed.), Sharing our knowledge: The Tlingit and their coastal neighbors (pp. 364–379). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  55. Thornton, T. F. (2015b). Alaska native corporations since ANCSA. Indigenous-state relations and biocultural health. Draft report. National Science Foundation, Arctic Social Sciences Project #075431.MS in author’s possession. Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  56. Thornton, T. F., Schroeder, R. F., & Bosworth, R. G. (1990). Use of sockeye salmon at Sitkoh Bay, Alaska. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Subsistence, Technical Paper No. 174. Juneau, AK.Google Scholar
  57. Vakhtin, N. B. (1998). Indigenous people of the Russian far North: Land rights and the environment. Polar Geography, 22(2), 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van Vactor, N. (2015). Opinion: Bring Alaska commercial fishing permits home. The Arctic Sounder. June 12: http://www.thearcticsounder.com/article/1524bring_alaska_commercial_fishing_permits_home. Accessed 15 Nov 2015.
  59. Victor-Howe, A.-M. (1992). Subsistence harvests and trade of Pacific herring spawn on Macrocystis kelp in Hydaburg, Alaska. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Subsistence, Technical Paper No. 225. Juneau, Alaska.Google Scholar
  60. Wheeler, P., & Thornton, T. F. (2005). Subsistence research in Alaska: A thirty year retrospective. Alaska Journal of Anthropology, 3(1), 69–103.Google Scholar
  61. Wilson, E. (2002). Est’ zakon, est’ i svoi zakony: Legal and moral entitlements to the fish resources of Nysky Bay, North-Eastern Sakhalin. In E. Kasten (Ed.), People and the land: Pathways to reform in post-Soviet Siberia (pp. 149–168). Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.Google Scholar
  62. Wolfe, R. J. (2015). Money and subsistence: Untangling relationships in Alaska. Paper presented at the XI Conference of Hunting and Gathering Societies (CHAGS), Vienna, Austria. 9 September.Google Scholar
  63. Wolfe, R. J., Scott C. L., Simeone, W. E., Utermohle, C. J., & Pete, M. C. (2009). The ‘super–household’ in Alaska Native subsistence economies. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Subsistence, Anchorage. Report on file. (National Science Foundation, ARC 0352611).Google Scholar
  64. Ziker, J. (2002). Peoples of the tundra: Northern Siberians in the post-communist transition. Long Grove: Waveland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the EnvironmentUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations