Advertisement

The Government Response to the Private Sector Expansion in Poland

  • Dominik Antonowicz
  • Marek Kwiek
  • Don F. Westerheijden
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education book series (PSGHE)

Abstract

One of the trademarks of transformation of Polish higher education is its tumultuous and inconsistent path of development driven by the rapid growth of private sector higher education. Such an expansion has been often described as a ‘sudden, shocking and unplanned’ phenomenon which revolutionized the institutional landscape of higher education in Central and Eastern Europe (Levy, 2007, p. 280). Also in Poland, the rise of private higher education is perhaps one of those aspects of the Polish higher education that caused revolutionary and far-reaching changes whose significance can be hardly overestimated. It also attracts scholars’ attention (e.g. Duczmal and Jongbloed, 2007; Antonowicz, 2016; Duczmal, 2006; Kwiek, 2012). However, clearly, there is still a knowledge gap in regards to the analysis of coping with the expansion and with governmental efforts to take control over the process of galloping expansion and securing minimum quality standards in (especially private) higher education.

Keywords

High Education Private Sector High Education Institution High Education System Structural Reform 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Dominik Antonowicz and Marek Kwiek would like to gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Research Council (NCN), grant number UMO-2013/10/M/HS6/00561.

References

  1. Antonowicz, D. (2015) O nieoczekiwanych konsekwencjach procesu ekspansji szkolnictwa wyzszego, Nauka 4, 145–159.Google Scholar
  2. Antonowicz, D., Gorlewski, B. (2011) Demograficzne tsunami. Raport Instytutu Sokratesa na temat wpływu zmian demograficznych na szkolnictwo wyzsze do 2020 roku. Warsaw: Instytut Sokratesa.Google Scholar
  3. Antonowicz, D., Krawczyk-Radwan, M., & Walczak, D. (2011). Rola Marki Dyplomu W Perspektywie Niżu Demograficznego W Polsce (2010–2020). Nauka I Szkolnictwo Wyższe, 37, 87–106.Google Scholar
  4. Antonowicz, D. (2016). Digital players in an analogue world. In B. Jongbloed & H. Vossensteyn (Eds.), Access and expansion. Post-massification opportunities and barriers to further growth in higher education participation (pp.  63–82). London:Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Antonowicz, D. (2015). Między siłą globalnych procesów a lokalną tradycją: Polskie szkolnictwo wyższe w dobie przemian. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.Google Scholar
  6. Antonowicz, D., & Borowicz, R. (2006). Higher education in Poland: The meaning of the human factor. Kultura I Edukacja, 4, 14–31.Google Scholar
  7. Antonowicz, D., Gorlewski, B. (2011) Demograficzne tsunami. Raport Instytutu Sokratesa na temat wpływu zmian demograficznych na szkolnictwo wyzsze do 2020 roku. Warsaw: Instytut Sokratesa.Google Scholar
  8. Dietl, J. (2001). Uwarunkowania Dalszego Rozwoju Niepaństwowego Szkolnictwa Wyższego W Polsce. Nauka I Szkolnictwa Wyższe, 2(18), 37–59.Google Scholar
  9. Dietl, J., & Zapijaszka, Z. eds. (2001). Podniesienie Jakości Studiów Warunkiem Przetrwania I Rozwoju Na Rynku Usług Edukacji Wyższej: Materiały Konferencyjne. Łódź: Fundacja Edukacyjna Przedsiębiorczości.Google Scholar
  10. Dobbins, M. (2011). Higher education policies in central and Eastern Europe: Convergence towards a common model? Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dobbins, M. (2015). Exploring the Governance of polish public higher education: Balancing restored historical legacies with Europeanization and market pressures. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(1), 18–33. doi: 10.1080/21568235.2014.969289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duczmal, W. (2006). The rise of private higher education in Poland: Policies, markets and strategies. Enschede: CHEPS/UT.Google Scholar
  13. Duczmal, W., & Jongbloed, B. (2007). Private higher education in Poland: A case of public- private dynamics. In J. Enders & B. Jongbloed (Eds.), Public-Private dynamics in higher education. expectations, developments and outcomes (pp. 415–442). Bielefeld: Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Enders, J., & Jongbloed, B. (2007). Public-Private dynamics in higher education: Expectations, developments and outcomes. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kowalska, E. (2013). Zmiana w szkolnictwie wyższym: Studium przypadków. Kraków: Impuls.Google Scholar
  16. Kwiek, M. (2009). The two decades of privatization in polish higher education. Cost-sharing, equity, and access. In J. Knight (Eds.), Financing access and equity in higher education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Kwiek, M. (2012). Changing higher education policies: From the deistitutionalization to the reinstitutionalization of the research mission in Polish Universities. Science and Public Policy, 39(5), 641–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kwiek, M. (2013). ‘From system expansion to system contraction. Access to Higher Education in Poland’. Comparative Education Review, 57(3), 553–576.Google Scholar
  19. Kwiek, M. (2016a). From growth to decline? demand-absorbing private higher education when demand is over. In M. Shah & S. Nair (Eds.), A global perspective of private higher education (pp. 53–80). New York: Elsevier, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kwiek, M. (2016b) De-privatization in higher education: A conceptual approach, Higher Education, doi:  10.1007/s10734-016-0047-3
  21. Kwiek, M., & Maasen, P. (2012). National higher education reforms in a European context: Comparative reflections on Poland and Norway. Higher Education Research and Policy 2 Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Levy, D. C. (2007). Legitimacy and privateness: Central and Eastern European higher education in a global context. In S. Slancheva & D.C. Levy (Eds.), Private higher education in Postcommunist Europe: In search of legitimacy. (pp. 143–161). New York: Pelgrave.Google Scholar
  23. NIK. (2000). Informacja O Wynikach Kontroli Funkcjonowania Nadzoru Państwa Nad Niepaństwowymi Szkołami Wyższymi I Wyższymi Szkołami Zawodowymi, NIK, Warszawa. Warszawa: Najwższa Izba Kontroli.Google Scholar
  24. Pawłowski, K. (2004). Społeczeństwo Wiedzy - Szansa Dla Polski. Kraków: Znak.Google Scholar
  25. Pinheiro, R., & Antonowicz, D. (2015). Opening the gates or coping with the flow? Governing access to higher education in Northern and central Europe. Higher Education, 70(3), 299–313. doi: 10.1007/s10734-014-9830-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Popłonkowski, T. (1996). Autonomia Uczelni, Instytucjonalne Ograniczenia Autonomii, Kierunki Zmian. In M. Dąbrowa-Szefler & M. Pastwa (Eds.), Finansowanie I Zarządzanie Szkolnictwem Wyższym Polska-Holandia (pp. 123–133). Warszawa: UW. CBPNiSW.Google Scholar
  27. Szczepanik, C. (2000). Państwo I Uczelnie. Forum Akademickie, 7(8), 26–28.Google Scholar
  28. Szczepański, M. S. (2001). McDonald’s Na Uniwersytecie. Tygodnik Powszechny, 3, 4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of SociologyNicolaus Copernicus University in ToruńTorunPoland
  2. 2.Center for Public Policy StudiesUniversity of PoznańPoznanPoland
  3. 3.Center for Hr Education Policy StudiesUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations