Advertisement

Open Surgery for Incontinence

  • Tom P. V. M. de Jong
  • Aart J. Klijn
Chapter
Part of the Urodynamics, Neurourology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions book series (UNPFD)

Abstract

Children with a neurogenic bladder have a denervated, paralyzed sphincter and pelvic floor in approximately 40% of cases. They need surgery to become dry and CIC to empty the bladder after surgery. Children with an overactive pelvic floor are dry on CIC but may need bladder surgery in case the bladder develops hostile pressures for the upper tract. Techniques of bladder neck surgery, slings, bladder augmentation techniques and catheterisable stomas will be described

Notes

Acknowledgment

We thank Mrs. Ingrid Visser for drawing the pictures in this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Grimsby GM, Menon V, Schlomer BJ, Baker LA, Adams R, Gargollo PC, et al. Long-term outcomes of bladder neck reconstruction without augmentation cystoplasty in children. J Urol. 2016;195(1):155–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferrer FA, Tadros YE, Gearhart J. Modified Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck reconstruction: new concepts about old ideas. Urology. 2001;58:791.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belman AB, Kaplan GW. Experience with the Kropp anti-incontinence procedure. J Urol. 1989;141:1160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salle JL, McLorie GA, Bagli DJ, Khoury AE. Urethral lengthening with anterior bladder wall flap (Pippi Salle procedure): modifications and extended indications of the technique. J Urol. 1997;158:585.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones JA, Mitchell ME, Rink RC. Improved results using a modification of the Young-Dees-Leadbetter bladder neck repair. Br J Urol. 1993;71:555.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chrzan R, Dik P, Klijn AJ, Kuijper CF, van den Heijkant MM, de Jong TP. Vesicoscopic bladder neck procedure in children: what we have learned from the first series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23:803.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elder JS. Periurethral and puboprostatic sling repair for incontinence in patients with myelodysplasia. J Urol. 1990;144:434.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chrzan R, Dik P, Klijn AJ, de Jong TP. Sling suspension of the bladder neck for pediatric urinary incontinence. J Pediatr Urol. 2009;5:82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Groen LA, Spinoit AF, Hoebeke P, Van LE, De TB, Everaert K. The AdVance male sling as a minimally invasive treatment for intrinsic sphincter deficiency in patients with neurogenic bladder sphincter dysfunction: a pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31:1284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garcia FA, Vagni R, Garcia AJ, Flores M, Sentagne L, Badiola F. Urethral mini-sling for the treatment of neurogenic sphincteric incompetence in pediatric and young adult patients. Arch Esp Urol. 2013;66:295.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barbalias G, Liatsikos E, Barbalias D. Use of slings made of indigenous and allogenic material (Goretex) in type III urinary incontinence and comparison between them. Eur Urol. 1997;31:394.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lottmann H, Traxer O, Aigrain Y, Melin Y. Posterior approach to the bladder for implantation of the 800 AMS artificial sphincter in children and adolescents: techniques and results in eight patients. Ann Urol (Paris). 1999;33:357.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dik P, van Gool JD, de Jong TP. Urinary continence and erectile function after bladder neck sling suspension in male patients with spinal dysraphism. BJU Int. 1999;83:971.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dik P, Klijn AJ, van Gool JD, de Jong TP. Transvaginal sling suspension of bladder neck in female patients with neurogenic sphincter incontinence. J Urol. 2003;170:580.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burch JC. Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper’s ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocele, and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961;81:281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    de Kort LM, Vijverberg MA, de Jong TP. Colposuspension in girls: clinical and urodynamic aspects. J Pediatr Urol. 2005;1:69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rawashdeh YF, Austin P, Siggaard C, Bauer SB, Franco I, de Jong TP, et al. International Children’s Continence Society’s recommendations for therapeutic intervention in congenital neuropathic bladder and bowel dysfunction in children. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31:615.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Veenboer PW, Nadorp S, de Jong TP, Dik P, van Asbeck FW, Bosch JL, et al. Enterocystoplasty vs detrusorectomy: outcome in the adult with spina bifida. J Urol. 2013;189:1066.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chrzan R, Dik P, Klijn AJ, Kuijper CF, de Jong TP. Detrusorectomy reduces the need for augmentation and use of antimuscarinics in children with neuropathic bladders. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9:193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Djordjevic ML, Vukadinovic V, Stojanovic B, Bizic M, Radojicic Z, Djordjevic D, et al. Objective long-term evaluation after bladder autoaugmentation with rectus muscle backing. J Urol. 2015;193:1824.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gurocak S, De Gier RP, Feitz W. Bladder augmentation without integration of intact bowel segments: critical review and future perspectives. J Urol. 2007;177:839.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hansen EL, Hvistendahl GM, Rawashdeh YF, Olsen LH. Promising long-term outcome of bladder autoaugmentation in children with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. J Urol. 2013;190:1869.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johal NS, Hamid R, Aslam Z, Carr B, Cuckow PM, Duffy PG. Ureterocystoplasty: long-term functional results. J Urol. 2008;179:2373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reinberg Y, Allen RC Jr, Vaughn M, McKenna PH. Nephrectomy combined with lower abdominal extraperitoneal ureteral bladder augmentation in the treatment of children with the vesicoureteral reflux dysplasia syndrome. J Urol. 1995;153:177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tekgul S, Oge O, Bal K, Erkan I, Bakkaloglu M. Ureterocystoplasty: an alternative reconstructive procedure to enterocystoplasty in suitable cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:577.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kajbafzadeh AM, Farrokhi-Khajeh-Pasha Y, Ostovaneh MR, Nezami BG, Hojjat A. Teapot ureterocystoplasty and ureteral Mitrofanoff channel for bilateral megaureters: technical points and surgical results of neurogenic bladder. J Urol. 2010;183:1168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mitrofanoff P. Trans-appendicular continent cystostomy in the management of the neurogenic bladder. Chir Pediatr. 1980;21:297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Makkas M. Zur behandlung der Blasenektopie. Umwandlung des ausgeschalteten Coecum zur Blase und der Appendix zur Urethra. Zentralbl Chir. 1910;37:1073.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lemelle JL, Simo AK, Schmitt M. Comparative study of the Yang-Monti channel and appendix for continent diversion in the Mitrofanoff and Malone principles. J Urol. 2004;172:1907.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    de Jong TP, Kuijper CF, Chrzan R, Dik P, Klijn AJ, Vijverberg MA. Efficacy and safety of urethral de-obstruction in boys with overactive bladder complaints. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9:1072.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hoebeke P, Van LE, Raes A, van Gool JD, Vande WJ. Anomalies of the external urethral meatus in girls with non-neurogenic bladder sphincter dysfunction. BJU Int. 1999;83:294.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Klijn AJ, Bochove-Overgaauw D, Winkler-Seinstra PL, Dik P, de Jong TP. Urethral meatus deformities in girls as a factor in dysfunctional voiding. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31:1161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pediatric UrologyUniversity Children’s Hospitals UMC Utrecht and AMC AmsterdamUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations