Towards a Software Engineering Approach for Cloud and IoT Services in Healthcare

  • Lisardo Prieto-Gonzalez
  • Gerrit Tamm
  • Vladimir Stantchev
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9789)


In this work a tailored approach for requirements engineering for risk management solutions is presented. The approach focuses on cross-disciplinary risk paradigms in inpatient healthcare and aims to provide a novel methodology that accounts for specific viewpoints of relevant expert groups. The presented results demonstrate the feasibility and usefulness of the approach in the context of the current evaluation within the German market.


Requirements engineering Risk management Software engineering Healthcare 



This publication is based on the research project “OpSIT” which received financial funding from the ministry of education, science, research and technology (BMBF) under the funding sign 16SV6048 within the programme “IKT 2020 - Forschung für Innovationen”. The authors are responsible for the content.


  1. 1.
    Avancha, S., Baxi, A., Kotz, D.: Privacy in mobile technology for personal healthcare. ACM Comput. Surv. 45, 3:1–3:54 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blumenthal, D.: Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. New Engl. J. Med. 360, 1477–1479 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ammenwerth, E., Schnell-Inderst, P., Machan, C., Siebert, U.: The effect of electronic prescribing on medication errors and adverse drug events: a systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 15, 585–600 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Black, A.D., Car, J., Pagliari, C., Anandan, C., Cresswell, K., Bokun, T., McKinstry, B., Procter, R., Majeed, A., Sheikh, A.: The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med. 8, e1000387 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stantchev, V., Franke, M.R., Discher, A.: Project portfolio management systems: business services and web services. In: Fourth International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services, ICIW 2009, pp. 171–176. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krallmann, H., Schröpfer, C., Stantchev, V., Offermann, P.: Enabling autonomous self-optimisation in service-oriented systems. In: Mahr, B., Huanye, S. (eds.) Autonomous Systems–Self-organization, Management, and Control, pp. 127–134. Springer, Netherlands (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stantchev, V., Malek, M.: Translucent replication for service level assurance. In: Zhang, L.-J., Paul, R., Dong, J. (eds.) High Assurance Services Computing, pp. 1–18. Springer, USA (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stantchev, V.: Effects of replication on web service performance in WebSphere. International Computer Science, Institute Berkeley, California (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stantchev, V., Hoang, T.D., Schulz, T., Ratchinski, I.: Optimizing clinical processes with position-sensing. IT Prof. 10, 2–31 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dzombeta, S., Stantchev, V., Colomo-Palacios, R., Brandis, K., Haufe, K.: Governance of cloud computing services for the life sciences. IT Prof. 16, 30–37 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik: Schutz Kritischer Infrastrukturen: Risikoanalyse Krankenhaus-IT - Leitfaden - Risikoanalyse_Krankenhaus-IT_Langfassung.pdf (2014).
  12. 12.
    Lei, J., Guan, P., Gao, K., Lu, X., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Meng, Q., Zhang, J., Sittig, D.F., Zheng, K.: Characteristics of health IT outage and suggested risk management strategies: an analysis of historical incident reports in China. Int. J. Med. Inf. 83, 122–130 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Menachemi, N., Brooks, R.G., Schwalenstocker, E., Simpson, L.: Use of health information technology by children’s hospitals in the United States. Pediatrics 123(Suppl 2), S80–S84 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    CMMI Product Team: CMMI for Development, version 1.2. (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rational Corporation: Rational Unified process: best practices for software development teams. Rational Software Corporation White Paper (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shuja, A.K., Krebs, J.: IBM Rational Unified Process Reference and Certification Guide: Solution Designer (RUP). Pearson Education (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lory, G., Director, G., Carter, J., MSFmentor, U., Rief, J.M., West, T.: Microsoft Solutions Framework version 3.0 overview, June 2003Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Benington, H.D.: Production of large computer programs. In: ICSE, pp. 299–310 (1987)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Takeuchi, H., Nonaka, I.: The new new product development game. Harv. Bus. Rev. 64, 137–146 (1986)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lightsey, B.: Systems engineering fundamentals. DTIC Document (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mazza, C., Fairclough, J., De Pablo, D., Stevens, R., Melton, B., Scheffer, A.: Software Engineering Standards. Prentice-Hall, London (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grady, R.B.: Practical Software Metrics for Project Management and Process Improvement. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River (1992)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Chapman, R.J.: Simple Tools and Techniques for Enterprise Risk Management. Wiley, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dickson, G.: Principles of risk management. Qual. Health Care 4, 75–79 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Krystek, U.: Handbuch Krisen- und Restrukturierungsmanagement: generelle Konzepte, Spezialprobleme. Kohlhammer Verlag, Praxisberichte. W (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smith, M.: The paradox of the risk society state (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morlock, L., Malitz, F.: Do hospital risk management programs make a difference?: relationships between risk management program activities and hospital malpractice claims experience. Law Contemp. Probl. 54, 1–22 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Joint Commission: Annual Report - Improving America’s Hospitals 2013 (2014)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Singh, M.P.: Norms as a basis for governing sociotechnical systems. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 5, 21:1–21:23 (2014)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Project Management Institute: Practice Standard for Project Risk Management. Project Management Institute (2009)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Glasberg, R., Hartmann, M., Draheim, M., Tamm, G., Hessel, F.: Risks and crises for healthcare providers: the impact of cloud computing. Sci. World J. 2014, e524659 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stantchev, V., Colomo-Palacios, R., Niedermayer, M.: Cloud computing based systems for healthcare. Sci. World J. 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gelfand, M.J., Higgins, M., Nishii, L.H., Raver, J.L., Dominguez, A., Murakami, F., Yamaguchi, S., Toyama, M.: Culture and egocentric perceptions of fairness in conflict and negotiation. J. Appl. Psychol. 87, 833 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisardo Prieto-Gonzalez
    • 1
  • Gerrit Tamm
    • 1
  • Vladimir Stantchev
    • 1
  1. 1.SRH Hochschule BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations