Advertisement

The Right to Silence in Denmark

  • Fenella M. W. Billing
Chapter

Abstract

The question of whether it is fair to gather confession evidence or evidence of silence in one legal system for use at trial in another commences with an examination of how the balance between effectiveness of law enforcement and fairness to the suspect or accused is maintained from the national perspective. This chapter, therefore, examines the domestic laws of Denmark that limit and protect the right to silence and the right against self-incrimination. This examination demonstrates how there is continuity between the investigative and trial phases in Danish criminal proceedings when viewed as a whole. Thus, this chapter forms part the basis for an overall comparative analysis, which explores the extent to which the national continuity of law becomes disjointed when evidence is transferred across borders. It is also the starting point to a later consideration of the influence of international human rights frameworks, such as the ICCPR and the ECHR, on national law and thereby on the transnational evidence gathering process-due to a lack of or the building of ‘trust’ between cooperating states.

References

  1. Bjørn O (2006) Retssikkerhedsloven og skatteforvaltningsretten. Karnov Group Online. SR.2006.130Google Scholar
  2. Blume P (2010) Juridisk Metodelære, 5th edn. DJØF Forlag, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  3. Brøbech B (2003) Ulovligt tilvejebragte beviser i straffeprocessen. DJØF Forlag, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen JP, Albæk Jensen J, Hansen Jensen M (2012) Dansk Statsret. DJØF Forlag, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  5. Christoffersen J (2015) Menneskerettens proportionalitetsprincip. Karnov Group Online. U.2015B.115Google Scholar
  6. Craig P, De Búrca G (2015) EU law: text, cases and materials, 6th edn. OUP, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dam P (2013) Advokater oplever fejl i politiets afhøringer. Available via Berlingske. http://www.b.dk/nationalt/advokater-oplever-fejl-i-politiets-afhoeringer. Accessed 15 Jan 2014
  8. Elo Rytter J (2013) Individets grundlæggende rettigheder. Karnov Group, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  9. Emmerson B, Ashworth A, Macdonald A (eds) (2012) Human rights and criminal justice, 3rd edn. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldtmann B, Knop Reventlow S (2013) Denmark. In: Ligeti K (ed) Towards a prosecutor for the European Union, vol 1, A comparative analysis. Hart, OregonGoogle Scholar
  11. Frost JL (1968) Anmedelse om bogen: Tysk Strafferets Indtrængen Karnov Group Online. U.1968B.130Google Scholar
  12. Gammeltoft-Hansen H (1989) Strafferetspleje II. DJØF Forlag, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  13. Garde P (2003) Birgitte Brøbech: ulovligt tilvejebragte beviser i straffeprocessen, Jurist og Økonomforbundets Forlag. Karnov Group Online. FM 2003.166Google Scholar
  14. Gomard B, Møller J, Talevski O, Thønnings P (2013) Kommenteret Retsplejelov Bruxelles I-forordning: Bind III, 9th edn. DJØF Forlag, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  15. Greve V, Cornils K (2011) Studies in Danish criminal law. DJØF Publishing, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  16. Henricson I (2012) Politiret, 5th edn. DJØF Forlag, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  17. Inkorporeringsudvalget (The incorporation committee) (1991) Den europæiske menneskerettighedskonventionen og dansk ret. Betænkning 1220-1991 (The European Convention on Human Rights and Danish Law Report 1220). Ministry of Justice, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  18. Inkorporeringsudvalget (The incorporation committee) (2001) Inkorporering af menneskerettighedskonventioner i dansk lovgivning, Betænkning 1407-2001 (Incorporation of human rights conventions in Danish Law, Report 1407-2001), Ministry of Justice, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  19. Inkorporeringsudvalget (The incorporation committee) (2014) Betænkning om inkorporering mv. inden for menneskeretsområdet. Betænkning 1546-2014 (Report on incorporation and other matters in the area of human rights 1546). Ministry of Justice, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  20. Jochimsen J (2001) Dokumentation af forklaringer i straffesager. Karnov Group Online. TfK2001.197Google Scholar
  21. Jochimsen J (2003) Anonyme Vidner og Hemmelige Agenter. Forlaget Thomson, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  22. Justitsministeriet (Denmark) (2010) Spørgsmål og Svar nr 1562 fra Folketingets Retsudvalg (Alm. Del). Available via Folketinget. http://www.ft.dk/samling/20091/almdel/reu/spm/1562/svar/748715/906995/index.htm. Accessed 15 Jan 2014
  23. Knudsen ML (1996) Passivitet som bevis i straffesager. Justitia (1)Google Scholar
  24. Lindencrone Petersen L, Werlauff E (2014) Dansk Retspleje, 6th edn. Karnov Group, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  25. Olesen A (2013) Løsladt og gældsat. DJØF Forlag, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  26. Rørdam T (1996) Bekæmpelse af den organiserede kriminalitet. Paper presented with Bay Larsen L, Thiesen H at Gruppdiskussion Bekämpandet av den organiserade brottsligheten – 34th Nordiske Juristmøde, Stockholm, 21–23 August 1996Google Scholar
  27. Rørdam P (2001) Mangler ved bevisets tilvejebringelse. Available via Karnov. U.2001B.337Google Scholar
  28. Rørdam T (2012) Forsvareren. Karnov Group, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  29. SKAT (2007) Tvangsindgreb og retssikkerhedsloven, SKM2007.91.SKAT. http://skat.dk/SKAT.aspx?oID = 1613857. Accessed 15 Jan 2014
  30. SKAT (2013) Den juridiske vejledning 2013-1 af 2013-01-24, A.C. Kontrol og straf. Available via Karnov Group online. Accessed 15 Jun 2013. Now available in version: 2.4 – 31.07.15. http://skat.dk/SKAT.aspx?oId = 1919749&chk = 211047. Accessed 15 Oct 2015
  31. Smith E (2013) Straffeprocess, 7th edn. Forlaget Thomson, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith E, Jochimsen J, Kistrup M, Poulsen JL (2008) Straffeprocessen, 2nd edn. Forlaget Thomsen, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  33. Strafferetsudvalget (1971) Betænkning om Efterforskning i Straffesager m.v. Betænkning nr. 622 af 1971 (Report no. 622 of 1971 on Investigation in Criminal Cases etc.). http://www.statensnet.dk/betaenkninger/0601-0800/0622-1971/0622-1971_pdf/searchable_622-1971.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2016
  34. Toftegaard Nielsen G (2004) Centrale straffeprocessuelle principper. Karnov Group Online U.2004B.77Google Scholar
  35. Toftegaard Nielsen G (2011) Straffesagens Gang. DJØF Forlag, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  36. Vedsted-Hansen (2004) Inkorporering af menneskerettighedskonventioner – realitet og symbol. In: Toftegaard Nielsen G, Vedsted-Hansen J, Haagen Jensen C (eds) Festskrift om Menneskerettigheder til Carl Aage Nørgaard. DJØF Forlag, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fenella M. W. Billing
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LawAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations