SBVR to OWL 2 Mapping in the Domain of Legal Rules

  • Firas Al Khalil
  • Marcello Ceci
  • Kosala Yapa
  • Leona O’Brien
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9718)

Abstract

The Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (SBVR) is a specification created by the Object Management Group (OMG) to provide a way to semantically describe business concepts and specify business rules. However, reasoning with SBVR is still an open subject, and current efforts to provide reasoning are done through the Web Ontology Language (OWL), by providing a mapping between SBVR and OWL. In this paper we focus on the problem of mapping SBVR vocabulary and rulebook to OWL 2, but unlike previous mappings described in the literature, we provide a novel and unorthodox mapping that allows to describe legal rules which have their own intricate anatomy.

Keywords

SBVR OWL Rule Legal 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is mainly supported by Enterprise Ireland (EI) and the Irish Development Authority (IDA) under the Government of Ireland Technology Centre Programme.

References

  1. 1.
    Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (SBVR) Version 1.2, April 2013. http://www.omg.org/spec/SBVR/1.2/PDF
  2. 2.
    Abi-Lahoud, E., Butler, T., Chapin, D., Hall, J.: Interpreting regulations with SBVR. In: Joint Proceedings of the 7th International Rule Challenge, the Special Track on Human Language Technology and the 3rd RuleML Doctoral Consortium, Seattle, USA, July 11–13, 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abi-Lahoud, E., O’Brien, L., Butler, T.: On the road to regulatory ontologies. In: Casanovas, P., Pagallo, U., Palmirani, M., Sartor, G. (eds.) AICOL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8929, pp. 188–201. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Araszkiewicz, M.: Towards systematic research on statutory interpretation in AI and law. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2013: The Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference, December 11–13, 2013, pp. 15–24. University of Bologna, Italy (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ceravolo, P., Fugazza, C., Leida, M.: Modeling semantics of business rules. In: Digital EcoSystems and Technologies Conference, 2007, DEST 2007, pp. 171–176. Inaugural IEEE-IES (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Demuth, B., Liebau, H.-B.: An approach for bridging the gap between business rules and the semantic web. In: Paschke, A., Biletskiy, Y. (eds.) RuleML 2007. LNCS, vol. 4824, pp. 119–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Espinoza, A., Abi-Lahoud, E., Butler, T.: Ontology-driven financial regulatory change management: an iterative development process. In: 2nd Semantic Web and Linked Open Data workshop (SW-LOD), Enc 2014. 5th, November, Oaxaca, México (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gordon, T.F., Governatori, G., Rotolo, A.: Rules and norms: requirements for rule interchange languages in the legal domain. In: Governatori, G., Hall, J., Paschke, A. (eds.) RuleML 2009. LNCS, vol. 5858, pp. 282–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Horridge, M., Drummond, N., Goodwin, J., Rector, A.L., Stevens, R., Wang, H.: The manchester OWL syntax. In: Proceedings of the OWLED 2006 Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions, Athens, Georgia, USA, November 10–11, 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karpovic, J., Krisciuniene, G., Ablonskis, L., Nemuraite, L.: The comprehensive mapping of semantics of business vocabulary and business rules (SBVR) to OWL 2 ontologies. ITC 43(3), 289–302 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karpovic, J., Nemuraite, L.: Transforming SBVR business semantics into Web ontology language OWL2: main concepts. In: Information Technologies’ 2011: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Information and Software Technologies, IT 2011, Kaunas, Lithuania, pp. 231–238 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kendall, E., Linehan, M.H.: Mapping SBVR to OWL2. Technical report, IBM Research Report, RC25363 (WAT1303-040) (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reynares, E., Caliusco, M.L., Galli, M.R.: An automatable approach for SBVR to OWL 2 mappings. In: XVI Ibero-American Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 201–214 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reynares, E., Caliusco, M.L., Galli, M.R.: SBVR to OWL 2 mappings: an automatable and structural-rooted approach. CLEI Electron. J. 17(3) (2014). ISSN 0717-5000Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reynares, E., Caliusco, M.L., Galli, M.R.: A set of ontology design patterns for reengineering SBVR statements into OWL/SWRL ontologies. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(5), 2680–2690 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    W3C OWL Working Group: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview, 2nd edn. (2012). https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/
  17. 17.
    Wagner, G., Giurca, A., Lukichev, S.: A general markup framework for integrity and derivation rules. In: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Firas Al Khalil
    • 1
  • Marcello Ceci
    • 1
  • Kosala Yapa
    • 1
  • Leona O’Brien
    • 1
  1. 1.Governance, Risk, and Compliance Technology CenterUniversity College CorkCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations