Advertisement

A Review on Artificial Intelligence Based Parameter Forecasting for Soil-Water Content

  • Ferhat Özçep
  • Eray Yıldırım
  • Okan Tezel
  • Metin Aşçı
  • Savaş Karabulut
  • Tazegül Özçep
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9729)

Abstract

The purpose of this study, by using an artificial intelligent approaches, is to compare a correlation between geophysical and geotechnical parameters. The input variables for this system are the electrical resistivity reading, the water content laboratory measurements. The output variable is water content of soils. In this study, our data sets are clustered into 120 training sets and 28 testing sets for constructing the fuzzy system and validating the ability of system prediction, respectively. Relationships between soil water content and electrical parameters were obtained by curvilinear models. The ranges of our samples are changed between 1 - 50 ohm.m (for resistivity) and 20 - 60 (%, for water content). An artificial intelligent system (artificial neural networks, Fuzzy logic applications, Mamdani and Sugeno approaches) are based on some comparisons about correlation between electrical resistivity and soil-water content, for Istanbul and Golcuk Soils in Turkey.

Keywords

Fuzzy logic applications AI Mamdani and Sugeno approaches Geophysical and geotechnical data 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Liu, N.: Soil and Site Characterization Using Electromagnetic Waves, Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Raisov, O.Z.: Relationship of electrical resistivity and temperature for sod-serozemic solonchak. Vestnik MGU. Biology, Soil Science. N 3. Moscow University Press, Moscow (1973). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ananyan, A.A.: Permafrost studies, vol. 1. Academy of Science of USSR Press, Moscow (1961). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abidin, M.H.Z., Saad, R., Ahmad, F., Wijeyesekera, D.C., Yahya, A.S.: Soil moisture content and density prediction using laboratory resistivity experiment. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 5, 731–735 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pozdnyakova, L.A.: Electrical Properties of Soils. Ph.D.Thesis, University of Wyomins, USA (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ozcep, F., Tezel, O., Asci, M.: Correlation between electrical resistivity and soil-water content: Istanbul and Golcuk. International Journal of Physical Sciences 4(6), 362–365 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ball, R.J., Allen, G.J., Carter, M.A., Wilson, A.A., Ince, C., El-Turki, A.: The application of electrical resistance measurements to water transport in lime–masonry systems. Applied, Physics A 106(3), 669–677 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jang, J., Sun, C., Mizutani, E.: Neuro-fuzzy and Soft Computing. Prentice Hall (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Osman, O., Albora, A.M., Ucan, O.N.: Forward Modeling with Forced Neural Networks for Gravity Anomaly Profıle. Mathematical Geology 39(6), 593–605 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Islam, T., Chik, Z.: Improved near surface soil characterizations using a multilayer soil resistivity model. Geoderma 209, 136–142 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hazreek, Z.A., Aziman, M., Azhar, A.T.S., Chitral, W.D., Fauziah, A.M., Rosli, A.S.: The behaviour of laboratory soil electrical resistivity value under basic soil properties influences. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 23(1), p. 012002. IOP Publishing (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Islam, S., Chik, Z., Mustafa, M.M., Sanusi, H.: Model with artificial neural network to predict the relationship between the soil resistivity and dry density of compacted soil. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology 25(2), 351–357 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abidin, Z., Hazreek, M., Azhar, A.T.S.: The behaviour of laboratory soil electrical resistivity value under basic soil properties influences. Earth and Environmental Science 25(1) (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Charniak, E., McDermott, D.: Introduction to artificial intelligence. Addison (1985)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown, M.P., Poulton, M.M.: Locating buried objects for environmental site investigations using neural networks. JEEG 1, 179–188 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Takagi, T., Sugeno, M.: Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 15, 116–132 (1985)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Albora, A.M., Özmen, A., Ucan, O.N.: Residual separation of magnetic fields using a cellular neural network approach. Pure and Applied Geophysics 158(9–10), 1797–1818 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Albora, A.M., Ucan, O.N., Ozmen, A., Ozkan, T.: Separation of Bouguer anomaly map using cellular neural network. Journal of Applied Geophysics 46(2), 129–142 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Albora, A.M., Uçan, O., Aydogan, D.: Tectonic modeling of Konya-Beysehir Region (Turkey) using cellular neural networks. Annals of Geophysics 50(5) (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ozcep, F., Yildirim, E., Tezel, O., Asci, M., Karabulut, S.: Correlation between electrical resistivity and soil-water content based artificial intelligent techniques. International Journal of Physical Sciences 5(1), 047–056 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bian, H., Liu, S., Cai, G., Tian, L.: Artificial neural network model for predicting soil electrical resistivity. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 29(5), 1751–1759 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chik, Z., Islam, T.: Near surface soil characterizations through soil apparent resistivity: a case study. In: 2013 IEEE 7th International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems (IDAACS), vol. 1, pp. 57–60. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ferhat Özçep
    • 1
  • Eray Yıldırım
    • 2
  • Okan Tezel
    • 1
  • Metin Aşçı
    • 3
  • Savaş Karabulut
    • 1
  • Tazegül Özçep
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Geophysical Engineeringİstanbul ÜniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Geophysical EngineeringSakarya UniversitySakaryaTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Geophysical EngineeringKocaeli UniversityKocaeliTurkey
  4. 4.Sirinevler Mehmet Sen OkuluMinistry of National EducationIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations