Advertisement

Comparing Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) across Countries

Chapter
First Online:
  • 2.8k Downloads
Part of the Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (TVET, volume 23)

Abstract

The core idea of RPL (Recognition of Prior Learning) is to promote, to make visible and to make full use of the entire scope of learning results and (work) experience gained by an individual over the lifespan and irrespective of where, when and how the learning took place. This contribution aims at reviewing, comparing and contrasting policies and practices of prior learning, its assessment and recognition across ten countries including Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain and Switzerland. It starts with the emergence of RPL in the light of lifelong learning and a clarification of concepts and terms. It then turns on national RPL conditions and traditions in all ten countries with a particular focus on RPL procedures and assessment methods. The contribution ends with critically discussing main findings and developing recommendations for future research. Prior learning is an umbrella term for any kind of learning outcomes gained in various learning settings. Recognition of prior learning (RPL) refers to the process of identifying, assessing and recognising any learning results that were acquired by individuals in different learning contexts outside formal education and training systems. Its core idea is to promote, to make visible and to make full use of the entire scope of learning results and (work) experience gained by an individual over the lifespan and irrespective of where, when and how the learning took place.

Whereas many European countries make a distinction between formal, nonformal or informal learning and its outcomes, this is not the case with most of the non-European countries where the term ‘prior learning’ is more common.

What they have in common is a growing interest in making the results of learning processes transparent and usable for labour markets or for educational access.

Against this background, this contribution aims at reviewing, comparing and contrasting policies and practices of prior learning, its assessment and recognition across ten countries including Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain and Switzerland. It starts with the emergence of RPL in the light of lifelong learning and a clarification of concepts and terms. It then turns on national RPL conditions and traditions in all ten countries with a particular focus on RPL procedures and assessment methods. The contribution ends with critically discussing main findings and developing recommendations for future research.

Keywords

Learning Outcome Lifelong Learning Training System Informal Learning Formal Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The author gratefully acknowledges the helpful, constructive and thoughtful comments of the editors and especially Judith Harris on an earlier version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Allais, S. M., Raffe, D., Strathdee, R., Wheelahan, L., & Young, M. (2009). Learning from the first qualifications frameworks. Employment Working Paper No. 45, Geneva.Google Scholar
  2. Bartram, D. (2005). The great eight competencies: A criterion-centric approach to validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1185–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becket, D., & Hager, P. (2002). Life, work and learning: Practice in postmodernity. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. BIBB–Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung. (2013). Datenreport zum Berufsbildungsbericht 2013. Bonn.Google Scholar
  5. BMBF–Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. (2014). Bericht zum Anerkennungsgesetz 2014. Berlin.Google Scholar
  6. Bohlinger, S. (2008a). Competences as the core element of the European qualifications Framework. European Journal of Vocational Training, 42/43(3/1), 96–118.Google Scholar
  7. Bohlinger, S. (2008b). Kompetenzentwicklung für Europa. Opladen: Budrich.Google Scholar
  8. Bohlinger, S. (2013). Applying ECVET principles. Final report on ECVET application in the context of recognising informal and non-formal learning. Osnabrück/Berlin/Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  9. Bohlinger, S., & Münchhausen, G. (2011). Recognition and validation of prior learning. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
  10. Bowman, K., Clayton, B., Bateman, A., Knight, B., Thomson, P., Hargreaves, J., Blom, K., & Enders, M. (2003). Recognition of prior learning in the vocational education and training sector. Adelaide: NCVER.Google Scholar
  11. Brandstetter, G., & Luomi-Messerer, K. (2010). European inventory on validation of nonformal and informal learning 2010. Country report: Austria. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  12. Canadian Council on Learning. (2009). Taking account: A report on the number of PLAR assessments conducted by public post-secondary institutions in Canada. Ottawa.Google Scholar
  13. Charraud, A.-M. (2010). European inventory on validation of nonformal and informal learning 2010. Country Report: France. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  14. Colardyn, D. (1996). La gestion des compétences. Perspectives internationales. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  15. Colardyn, D., & Bjørnåvold, J. (2004). Validation of formal, non-formal and informal learning: Policy and practices in EU member states. European Journal of Education, 39(1), 70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Colley, H., Hodkinson, P., & Malcom, J. (2003). Informality and formality in learning: A report for the Learning and Skills Research Centre. Leeds.Google Scholar
  17. Conrad, D. (2014). RPL in higher education: Past, present and potential. In J. Harris, C. Wihak, & J. Van Kleef (Eds.), Handbook of the recognition of prior learning (pp. 315–336). Research into practice. Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  18. Conrad, D. (2008). Revisiting the recognition of prior learning (RPL): A reflective inquiry into RPL practice in Canada. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 34(2), 89–110.Google Scholar
  19. Coughlan, D. (2010). European inventory on validation of nonformal and informal learning 2010. Country report: Ireland. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  20. Council of the European Union. (2012). Recommendation on the validation of non-formal and informal learning. 2012/C 398/01. Official Journal of the European Union, C398 of 22.12.2012, 1.Google Scholar
  21. de Terssac, G. (1996). Savoirs, compétences et travail. In J. M. Barbier (Ed.), Savoirs théoriques et savoirs d’action (pp. 223–248). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  22. Duvekot, R. (2010). European inventory on validation of nonformal and informal learning 2010 Country report: Netherlands. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  23. Dyson, C., & Keating, J. (2005). Recognition of prior learning. ILO working paper No. 21, Geneva.Google Scholar
  24. Engeström, Y. (1984). Students’ conceptions and textbook presentations of the movement of the moon: A study in the manufacture of misconceptions. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet.Google Scholar
  25. Engeström, Y. (1991). Non scolae sed vitae discimus: Toward overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. Learning and Instruction, 1(3), 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning, implicit learning and tacit knowledge. In F. Coffield (Ed.), The necessity of informal learning (pp. 12–31). Bristol: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. European Commission. (2001). Communiqué making a European area of lifelong learning a reality. COM(2001) 678 final. Brussels.Google Scholar
  28. European Commission, Cedefop, ICF International. (2014). European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning 2014. Final synthesis report. http://libserver.cedefop.europa.eu/vetelib/2014/87244.pdf
  29. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2008). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning. PE-CONS (2008)3662/07, Brussels.Google Scholar
  30. Expert Group on Future Skills Needs. (2011). Developing recognition of prior learning (RPL). The role of RPL in the context of the national skills strategy upskilling objectives Dublin. http://www.skillsireland.ie/media/egfsn110411-developing_recognition_of_prior_learning.pdf
  31. FSEA & SVEB. (2014). Jahresbericht 2013. Zürich: Schweizer Verband für Weiterbildung.Google Scholar
  32. Gagné, R. M. (1973). The conditions of learning (2nd ed.). New York: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  33. Harris, J., Breier, M., & Wihak, C. (2011). Researching the recognition of prior learning: International perspectives. Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  34. Harris, J., Wihak, C., & Van Kleef, J. (2014). Handbook of the recognition of prior learning. Research into practice. Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  35. Heyns, J. P. (2004). Recognition of prior learning (RPL): In search of a valid and sustainable mechanism for South Africa. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.Google Scholar
  36. Kenniscentrum EVC. (2014). Toekomstbestendige inrichting van een systeem voor validering. Implementatieplan. BP ‘s-Hertogenbosch.Google Scholar
  37. Klimmer, S., Holzer, C., Schlögl, P., & Neubauer, B. (2009). Berufsreifeprüfung. Aktualisierung von Vorbereitungsangeboten, TeilnehmerInnen- und AbsolventInnenzahlen. Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Unterricht, Kunst und Kultur (BMUKK). Wien: Ibw & öibf.Google Scholar
  38. Lafont, P., & Pariat, M. (2012). Review of the recognition of prior learning in member states in Europe. Paris: Working Paper of the University of Paris Est Creteil.Google Scholar
  39. Méhaut, P., & Lecourt, A.-J. (2007). The accreditation of prior learning experience in France: A good start, to be continued. Marseille: Discussion paper of the Institute of Labour Economics and Industrial Sociology.Google Scholar
  40. Nussbaum, M. (1995). Human capabilities, female human beings. In M. Nussbaum & J. Glover (Eds.), A study of human capabilities (pp. 61–104). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pertrulli, E., & di Francesco, G. (2010). European inventory on validation of nonformal and informal learning 2010. Country Report: Italy. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  42. Pires, A. L. O. (2005). Recognition and validation of experimental learning. Sísifo. Educational Sciences Journal, 2, 5–20.Google Scholar
  43. Prism Economics and Analysis. (2004). Prior learning assessment and recognition: apprenticeship and trade certification in the pipe trades. Toronto.Google Scholar
  44. Salini, D., Petrini, B., & Voit, J. (2012). Inventaire des pratiques de validation des acquis de l’expérience (VAE) en Suisse. Rapport pour la direction du processus de monitorage suisse de l’éducation et de l’office fédéral de la formation professionnelle et de la technologie (OFFT). Lugano: Swiss Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (SFIVET).Google Scholar
  45. SAQA − South African Qualifications Authority. (2002). The recognition of prior learning in the context of the South African National Qualifications Framework. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.Google Scholar
  46. Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1973). Cognitive consequences of formal and informal education. Science, 182(4112), 553–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Singh, M. (2005). Recognition, validation and certification of informal and non-formal learning. Synthesis report (Draft). Paris: Unesco.Google Scholar
  49. Singh, M., & Duvekot, R. (2013). Linking recognition practices and national qualifications frameworks. Hamburg: Unesco Institute for Lifelong Learning.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, L., & Clayton, B. (2011). Student insights and perspectives on the validation of learning outcomes. In S. Bohlinger & G. Münchhausen (Eds.), Recognition and validation of prior learning (pp. 443–460). Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
  51. Souto-Otero, M. (2009). Making-up people’s minds: How can VET be made more attractive and relevant to economic needs? Peer review on “Towards a new vocational training system more adjusted to the new competencies and skills requirements of the labour market”. Spain, 25–26 May 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=10776&langId=en. Accessed 05 Dec 2014.
  52. Souto-Otero, M. (2010). Validation of non-formal and informal learning in Europe: Between vocationalism and social change? In G. Elliot, F. Chahid, & S. Issler (Eds.), Education and social change (pp. 251–262). London: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
  53. Statistics Canada. (2014): Registered Apprenticeship Information System (RAIS). Ontario. www.statcan.gc.ca. Accessed 03 Dec 2014.
  54. Theisen, G., & Adams, D. (1990). International comparative education. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  55. Travers, N., & Harris, J. (2014). Trends and issues in the professional development of RPL practitioners. In J. Harris, C. Wihak, & J. Van Kleef (Eds.), Handbook of the recognition of prior learning. Research into practice (pp. 233–258). Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  56. UNESCO. (2012). UNESCO guidelines for the recognition, validation and accreditation of the outcomes of non-formal and informal learning. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.Google Scholar
  57. Ure, O. B. (2007). Lifelong learning in Norway. A deflating policy balloon or an act of piecemeal implementation? Oslo: Fafo.Google Scholar
  58. Van Kleef, J. (2014). Life after PLAR – The post-assessment success of candidates. In J. Harris, C. Wihak, & J. Van Kleef (Eds.), Handbook of the recognition of prior learning. Research into practice (pp. 356–383). Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  59. VOX–Norwegian Agency for Lifelong Learning. (2010). Recognition of prior learning used as the basis for exemption in higher education. Oslo.http://www.vox.no/no/global-meny/English/Accreditation/Reports-and-resources/Google Scholar
  60. Watson, K. (1996). Comparative education. In P. Gordon (Ed.), A guide to educational research (pp. 360–397). London/Portland: Woburn Press.Google Scholar
  61. Werquin, P. (2014). Labour markets and national qualifications frameworks: A policy perspective. In J. Harris, C. Wihak, & J. Van Kleef (Eds.), Handbook of the recognition of prior learning. Research into practice (pp. 86–111). NIACE: Leicester.Google Scholar
  62. Wihak, C. (2006). State of the field review: Prior Learning Assessment and Recognition (PLAR). A report commissioned by the Canadian Council on Learning (CCL). Ottawa: CCL.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dresden University of TechnologyDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options