A Novel Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Scheme Design Using Dual View Mammograms

  • Wenqing Sun
  • Tzu-Liang (Bill) Tseng
  • Bin Zheng
  • Jiangying Zhang
  • Wei Qian
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9699)

Abstract

Computer aided diagnosis (CADx) schemes based on dual view mammograms are able to provide extra information compared to single view schemes. To explore an efficient and effective way for combining the information from different views, a new breast cancer risk analysis scheme was developed and tested in this study. 120 pairs of dual view mammograms from 120 women were used in this study. Three different groups of texture features and density features were extracted from both MLO view and CC view mammograms. The asymmetry score that measures the asymmetry levels of these two view mammograms was considered in our proposed scheme. 91 computational features on each view and 3 asymmetry measurements were computed and used for the proposed scheme. Three classifiers were used in our proposed scheme, one for each of the dual view mammograms, and the third one combined dual view scores with asymmetry measurements. The highest area under the curve (AUC) we obtained was 0.753 ± 0.039.

Keywords

Breast cancer Dual-view mammogram Risk analysis Asymmetry measurements 

References

  1. 1.
    Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z., Jemal, A.: Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J. Clin. 64(1), 9–29 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wolfe, J.N.: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol. 126(6), 1130–1137 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gail, M.H., Brinton, L.A., Byar, D.P., et al.: Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 81(24), 1879–1886 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Claus, E.B., Risch, N., Thompson, W.D.: Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 48(2), 232–242 (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parmigiani, G., Berry, D.A., Aquilar, O.: Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62(1), 145–148 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jonker, M.A., Jacobi, C.E., Hoogendoorn, W.E., Nagelkerke, N.J., de Bock, G.H., van Houwelingen, J.C.: Modeling familial clustered breast cancer using published data. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 12(12), 1479–1485 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS® Atlas). American College of Radiology, Reston, VA (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berg, W.A., Campassi, C., Langenberg, P., et al.: Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 174(6), 1769–1777 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sun, W., Zheng, B., Lure, F., Wu, T., Zhang, J., Wang, B.Y., Qian, W.: Prediction of near-term risk of developing breast cancer using computerized features from bilateral mammograms. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 38(5), 348–357 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun, W., Tseng, T.L.B., Qian, W., Zhang, J., Saltzstein, E.C., Zheng, B., Zhou, S.: Using multiscale texture and density features for near-term breast cancer risk analysis. Med. Phy. 42(6), 2853–2862 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kopans, D.B.: Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk 1. Radiology 246(2), 348–353 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Unser, M.: Sum and difference histograms for texture classification. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1, 118–125 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tice, J.A., O’Meara, E.S., Weaver, D.L., Vachon, C., Ballard-Barbash, R., Kerlikowske, K.: Benign breast disease, mammographic breast density, and the risk of breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 105(14), 1043–1049 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu, D.H., Kurani, A.S., Furst, J.D., Raicu, D.S.: Run-length encoding for volumetric texture. Heart 27, 25 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Qian, W., Sun, W., Zheng, B.: Improving the efficacy of mammography screening: the potential and challenge of developing new computer-aided detection approaches. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 12(5), 497–499 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenqing Sun
    • 1
  • Tzu-Liang (Bill) Tseng
    • 1
  • Bin Zheng
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jiangying Zhang
    • 4
  • Wei Qian
    • 3
    • 1
  1. 1.College of EngineeringUniversity of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA
  2. 2.College of EngineeringUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  3. 3.Sino-Dutch Biomedical and Information Engineering SchoolNortheastern UniversityShenyangChina
  4. 4.College of Biological SciencesUniversity of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA

Personalised recommendations