The Characteristics of Malignant Breast Tumors Imaged Using a Prototype Mechanical Imaging System as an Adjunct to Mammography

  • Magnus Dustler
  • Daniel Förnvik
  • Pontus Timberg
  • Hannie Petersson
  • Anders Tingberg
  • Sophia Zackrisson
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9699)


Breast cancer is diagnosed by a combination of modalities. Measuring the elasto-mechanical properties of suspicious lesions, by e.g. ultrasound elastography, can help differentiate malignant from benign findings. Using a prototype Mechanical Imaging (MI) system as an adjunct to mammography, the aim of this study was to characterize tumors using MI and compare the readings to those from the contralateral breast. Thirteen bilateral MI sets from women with malignant breast lesions were included in this study, drawn from a larger set of 155 women recalled from screening. The results showed that mean lesion pressure was significantly greater than the mean pressure of the corresponding breast, 7.5 ± 7.0 kPa compared to 2.5 ± 1.6 kPa (P = 0.01). There was no evidence for a difference in mean pressure or standard deviation of the MI image between symptomatic and contralateral asymptomatic breasts (P = 0.24 and 0.68). The results support that it is possible to use MI to distinguish malignant cancers from normal breast tissue. Still, further investigations of the characteristics of benign lesions are necessary to ascertain the usefulness of the system.


Mammography Mechanical imaging Elastography Screening 



The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Dr. Ingvar Andersson. We would also like to acknowledge the Unilabs staff at the Malmö Breast Centre for their contribution to the acquisition of the data. This study was supported by a grant from Stiftelsen för cancerforskning vid onkologiska kliniken vid Universitetssjukhuset MAS.


  1. 1.
    Zhi, H., Ou, B., Luo, B.M., Feng, X., Wen, Y.L., Yang, H.Y.: Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions. J. Ultrasound Med. 26, 807–815 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cespedes, I., Ophir, J., Ponnekanti, H., Maklad, N.: Elastography - elasticity imaging using ultrasound with application to muscle and breast in-vivo. Ultrason. Imaging 15, 73–88 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Itoh, A., Ueno, E., Tohno, E., Kamma, H., Takahashi, H., Shiina, T., Yamakawa, M., Matsumura, T.: Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 239, 341–350 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sinkus, R., Lorenzen, J., Schrader, D., Lorenzen, M., Dargatz, M., Holz, D.: High-resolution tensor MR elastography for breast tumour detection. Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 1649–1664 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sinkus, R., Tanter, M., Xydeas, T., Catheline, S., Bercoff, J., Fink, M.: Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography. Magn. Reson. Imaging 23, 159–165 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Engelken, F.J., Sack, I., Klatt, D., Fischer, T., Fallenberg, E.M., Bick, U., Diekmann, F.: Evaluation of tomosynthesis elastography in a breast-mimicking phantom. Eur. J. Radiol. 81, 2169–2173 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mahoney, L., Csima, A.: Efficiency of palpation in clinical detection of breast-cancer. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 127, 729–730 (1982)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mathis, K.L., Hoskin, T.L., Boughey, J.C., Crownhart, B.S., Brandt, K.R., Vachon, C.M., Grant, C.S., Degnim, A.C.: Palpable presentation of breast cancer persists in the era of screening mammography. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 210, 314–318 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krouskop, T.A., Wheeler, T.M., Kallel, F., Garra, B.S., Hall, T.: Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason. Imaging 20, 260–274 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wellman, P.S., Dalton, E.P., Krag, D., Kern, K.A., Howe, R.D.: Tactile imaging of breast masses: first clinical report. Arch. Surg. 136, 204–208 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sarvazyan, A.: Mechanical imaging: a new technology for medical diagnostics. Int. J. Med. Inform. 49, 195–216 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Egorov, V., Kearney, T., Pollak, S.B., Rohatgi, C., Sarvazyan, N., Airapetian, S., Browning, S., Sarvazyan, A.: Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions by mechanical imaging. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 118, 67–80 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fornvik, D., Andersson, I., Dustler, M., Ehrnstrom, R., Ryden, L., Tingberg, A., Zackrisson, S., Aaltonen, K.: No evidence for shedding of circulating tumor cells to the peripheral venous blood as a result of mammographic breast compression. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 141, 187–195 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dustler, M., Andersson, I., Brorson, H., Frojd, P., Mattsson, S., Tingberg, A., Zackrisson, S., Fornvik, D.: Breast compression in mammography: pressure distribution patterns. Acta Radiol. 53, 973–980 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fornvik, D., Dustler, M., Andersson, I., Brorson, H., Timberg, P., Zackrisson, S., Tingberg, A.: Pressure distribution in mammography: compression of breasts with malignant tumor masses. In: SPIE Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging, vol. 8668 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Magnus Dustler
    • 1
  • Daniel Förnvik
    • 1
  • Pontus Timberg
    • 1
  • Hannie Petersson
    • 1
  • Anders Tingberg
    • 1
  • Sophia Zackrisson
    • 2
  1. 1.Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of MedicineLund University, Skåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
  2. 2.Department of Imaging and Functional MedicineSkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations