Advertisement

Combining Low-Level Features of Offline Questionnaires for Handwriting Identification

  • Dirk Siegmund
  • Tina Ebert
  • Naser Damer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9730)

Abstract

When using anonymous offline questionnaires for reviewing services or products it is often not guaranteed that a reviewer does this only once as intended. In this paper an applied combination of different features of handwritten characteristics and its fusion is presented to expose such manipulations. The presented approach covers the aspects of alignment normalization, segmentation, feature extraction, classification and fusion. Nine features from handwritten text, numbers and checkboxes are extracted and used to recognize hand-writer duplicates. The proposed method has been tested on a novel database containing pages of handwritten text produced by 1,734 writers. Furthermore we show that the unified biometric decision using a weighted sum combination rule can significantly improve writer identification performance even on low level features.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdl, B., Mohammed, K., Hashim, S.Z.M.: Handwriting identication: a direction review. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Signal and Image Processing Applications (ICSIPA), pp. 459–463. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arora, H., Lee, S., Srihari, S.N., Cha, S.H.: Individuality of handwriting. J. Forensic Sci. 47(4), 1–17 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., Van Gool, L.: Surf: speeded up robust features. In: Leonardis, A., Bischof, H., Pinz, A. (eds.) ECCV 2006, Part I. LNCS, vol. 3951, pp. 404–417. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bozinovic, R.M., Srihari, S.N.: O-line cursive script word recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11(1), 68–83 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cermeno, E., Mallor, S., Siguenza, J.A.: Offline handwriting segmentation for writer identication. In: 2014 International Symposium on Biometrics and Security Technologies (ISBAST), pp. 13–17. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Damer, N., Opel, A., Nouak, A.: Biometric source weighting in multibiometric fusion: towards a generalized and robust solution. In: 22nd European Signal Processing Conference, EUSIPCO 2014, Lisbon, Portugal, 1–5 September 2014, pp. 1382–1386 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jain, R., Doermann, D.: Combining local features for offline writer identification. In: 2014 14th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR), pp. 583–588. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kleber, F., Fiel, S., Diem, M., Sablatnig, R.: Cvl-database: An off-line database for writer retrieval, writer identication and word spotting. In: 2013 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), pp. 560–564. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Likforman-Sulem, L., Hanimyan, A., Faure, C.: A hough based algorithm for extracting text lines in handwritten documents. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 1995, vol. 2, pp. 774–777. IEEE (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Louloudis, G., Gatos, B., Stamatopoulos, N., Papandreou, A.: Icdar 2013 competition on writer identication. In: 2013 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), pp. 1397–1401, August 2013Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marti, U.V., Bunke, H.: The iam-database: an english sentence database for offline handwriting recognition. Int. J. Doc. Anal. Recogn. 5(1), 39–46 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marti, U.V., Messerli, R., Bunke, H.: Writer identication using text line based features. In: Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 2001, pp. 101–105. IEEE (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schomaker, L., Bulacu, M.: Automatic writer identication using connected-component contours and edge-based features of uppercase western script. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26(6), 787–798 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siddiqi, I., Vincent, N.: Text independent writer recognition using redundant writing patterns with contour-based orientation and curvature features. Pattern Recogn. 43(11), 3853–3865 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suen, C.Y., Nadal, C., Legault, R., Mai, T.A., Lam, L.: Computer recognition of unconstrained handwritten numerals. Proc. IEEE 80(7), 1162–1180 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, D., Huang, Z., Lu, Y.: Text-independent writer recognition using modied texture and microstructure features. In: 2014 International Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing (PIC), pp. 75–78. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wilkinson, R.A., Geist, J., Janet, S., Grother, P., Burges, C.J., Creecy, R., Hammond, B., Hull, J.J., Larsen, N., Vogl, T.P., et al.: Therst census optical character recognition system conference, vol. 184. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology (1992)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu, X., Tang, Y., Bu, W.: Offline text-independent writer identication based on scale invariant feature transform. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 9(3), 526–536 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Zeeuw, F.: Slant correction using histograms. Undergraduate thesis (2006). http://www.ai.rug.nl/axel/teaching/bachelorprojects/zeeuw_slantcorrection.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Research (IGD)DarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations