Advertisement

Learning Through Videos: Are Disabled Students Using Good Note-Taking Strategies?

  • Abi James
  • E. A. Draffan
  • Mike Wald
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9758)

Abstract

The importance of note-taking in face to face teaching and learning situations is well understood in terms of successful outcomes for the majority of students. Outcomes from interactions with online learning and the use of videos as a way of revising has been less well researched, in particular with disabled students. This paper aims to introduce the notion that not all disabled students who could use technology to support note taking necessarily find it effective although they prefer to listen and watch videos. A small survey provides an indication that students may not necessarily be making the best use of their technologies or have access to alternative ways of viewing online learning materials. Where there are options to view videos using lecture capture systems; time constraints and the quality of the videos prove to be further barriers, rather than providing a successful outcome. Despite the possibility of multi-modal/multichannel approaches there also remains very little research on the subject in particular when using more recent Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). There are, however, indications that with the increased use of transcriptions and graphical tools, these options could offer good note-taking strategies as part of a more inclusive approach for all students.

Keywords

Videos Note taking Graphical tools Disabled students Dyslexia 

References

  1. 1.
    Kiewra, K.A.: Investigating notetaking and review: a depth of processing alternative. Educ. Psychol. 20(1), 23–32 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyle, J.R.: Note-taking and secondary students with learning disabilities: challenges and solutions. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract. 27(2), 90–101 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hanafin, J., Shevlin, M., Kenny, M., McNeela, E.: Including young people with disabilities: assessment challenges in higher education. High. Educ. 54, 435–448 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Hara, S.: Improving Your Study Skills: Study Smart, Study Less. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Piolat, A., Olive, T., Kellogg, R.T.: Cognitive effort during note taking. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 19(3), 291–312 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kiewra, K.A., Benton, S.L.: The effects of higher-order review questions with feedback on achievement among learners who take notes or receive the instructor’s notes. Hum. Learn. J. Pract. Res. Appl. 4, 225–231 (1985)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peverly, S.T., Ramaswamy, V., Brown, C., Sumowski, J., Alidoost, M., Garner, J.: What predicts skill in lecture note taking? J. Educ. Psychol. 99(1), 167 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kiewra, K.A., Benton, S.L.: The relationship between information-processing ability and notetaking. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 13(1), 33–44 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fisher, J.L., Harris, M.B.: Effect of note taking and review on recall. J. Educ. Psychol. 65(3), 321 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bui, D.C., Myerson, J., Hale, S.: Note-taking with computers: exploring alternative strategies for improved recall. J. Educ. Psychol. 105(2), 299 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bui, D.C., Myerson, J.: The role of working memory abilities in lecture note-taking. Learn. Individ. Differ. 33, 12–22 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mueller, P.A., Oppenheimer, D.M.: The pen is mightier than the keyboard advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychol. Sci. 25(6), 1159–1168 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnson, L., Adams, S., Cummins, M.: NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher, Education edn. The New Media Consortium, Austin (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Auer, S., Khalili, A., Tarasowa, D.: Crowd-sourced Open Courseware Authoring with Slide Wiki. org iJET 8(1): 62–63 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guo, P.J., Kim, J., Rubin, R.: How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale Conference, pp. 41–50. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Draffan, E.A., James, A., Wald, M., Dickens, K.: MOOCs - the web science experience. In: Proceedings of the W3C Accessible e-Learning Symposium, December 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taplin, R.H., Kerr, R., Brown, A.M.: Opportunity costs associated with the provision of student services: a case study of web-based lecture technology. High. Educ. 68(1), 15–28 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leadbeater, W., Shuttleworth, T., Couperthwaite, J., Nightingale, K.P.: Evaluating the use and impact of lecture recording in undergraduates: evidence for distinct approaches by different groups of students. Comput. Educ. 61, 185–192 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vajoczki, S., Watt, S., Fenton, N., Tarkowski, J., Voros, G., Vine, M.M.: Lecture capture: an effective tool for universal instructional design? Can. J. High. Educ. 44(2), 1–29 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Burgstahler, S.: Opening doors or slamming them shut? online learning practices and students with disabilities. Soc. Incl. 3(6) (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dunn, K.G.: The challenges of launching a MOOC and reusing that material in a blended campus class. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leadbeater, W., Anderson, V., Onens, S., Nightingale, K.P.: Supplementary lecture recording. A stepping stone to inclusion? In: Presentation to the ADSHE Conference, June 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Department for Business, Innovation and Skill: Disabled Students Allowances (DSAs) (2016). https://www.gov.uk/disabled-students-allowances-dsas/overview. Accessed Jan 2016
  24. 24.
    Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ. Psychol. 38(1), 43–52 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wald, M.: Synote: accessible and assistive technology enhancing learning for all students. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6180, pp. 177–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WAIS, ECSUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations