Co-creating an Online TimeBank for Inclusive Research
Participatory and inclusive approaches to research have become more common as researchers recognize the benefits of enabling the meaningful involvement of representative community users in the development of accessible technologies. One of the major challenges in this context is how the involvement of community members can be appropriately supported in project-related activities: payment for time and contributions is a particularly difficult and longstanding issue. This paper discusses the inclusive development of an online Timebank involving community members with intellectual disabilities. The TimeBank is conceived as a tool that enables people to contribute their different expertise on the basis of time, rather than monetary reward. The development process of the TimeBank is described as well as the challenges faced by the research team. There is much potential in the Timebank idea, although considerable further research is needed to establish an accessible, usable, credible and trustworthy resource.
KeywordsParticipatory research User involvement Intellectual disabilities Equity Inclusion
This project was funded by the WebScience Stimulus Fund at the University of Southampton, UK.
- 4.Bleumers, L., All, A., Mariën, I., Schurmans, D., Van Looy, J., Jacobs, A., Willaert, K., de Grove, F.: State of play of digital games for empowerment and inclusion: a review of the literature and empirical cases. In: EUR 25652 Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union (2012). doi: 10.2791/36295
- 5.Bretherton, J., Pleace, N.: An Evaluation of the Broadway Skills Exchange Time Bank. Centre for Housing Policy, University of York (2014)Google Scholar
- 6.Cahn, E.: No More Throw-Away People: The Co-production Imperative. Essential Books, Washington, D.C. (2000)Google Scholar
- 7.Coleman, R., Clarkson, J., Dong, H., Cassim, J.: Design for Inclusivity: A Practical Guide to Accessible, Innovative and User-Centred Design. Gower Publishing Limited, Hampshire, UK (2012)Google Scholar
- 9.Druin, A.: The role of children in the design of new technology. Behav. Inf. Technol. 21(1), 1–25 (2002)Google Scholar
- 11.Hooper, C., Nind, M., Parsons, S.J., Power, A., Collis, A.: Building a social machine: co-designing a TimeBank for inclusive research. In: WebSci 2015, Oxford, UK, 28 June–01 July 2015. doi: 10.1145/2786451.2786472
- 12.Lewis, A., Parsons, S., Robertson, C., Feiler, A., Tarlton, B., Watson, D., Marvin, C.: The role and working of reference, or advisory, groups involving disabled people: reviewing the experiences and implications of three contrasting research projects. Br. J. Spec. Educ. 35(2), 78–84 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Nind, M.: What is Inclusive Research?. Bloomsbury Academic, London (2014)Google Scholar
- 16.Nind, M., Armstrong, A., Cansdale, M., Collis, A., Hooper, C., Parsons, S., Power, A.: TimeBanking: Towards a co-produced solution for power and money issues in inclusive research. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. (in press). doi: 10.1080/13645579.2016.1179469
- 17.Parsons, S., Cobb, S.: Who chooses what I need? Child voice and userinvolvement in the development of learning technologies for children with autism. In: EPSRC Observatory for Responsible Innovation in ICT. http://observatory-rri.info/?q=obs-doc/report/case-study/473 (2013). Accessed 22 Jan 2016
- 20.Walmsley, J., Johnson, K.: Past, Present, and Futures. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London (2003)Google Scholar